Can Endovascular Treatment of Fusiform Intracranial Aneurysms Restore the Healthy Hemodynamic Environment?-A Virtual Pilot Study.
blood flow patterns
endovascular treatment
fusiform intracranial aneurysm
hemodynamic simulation
virtual stent deployment
Journal
Frontiers in neurology
ISSN: 1664-2295
Titre abrégé: Front Neurol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101546899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
06
09
2021
accepted:
08
12
2021
entrez:
10
2
2022
pubmed:
11
2
2022
medline:
11
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Numerous studies assess intracranial aneurysm rupture risk based on morphological and hemodynamic parameter analysis in addition to clinical information such as aneurysm localization, age, and sex. However, intracranial aneurysms mostly occur with a saccular shape located either lateral to the parent artery or at a bifurcation. In contrast, fusiform intracranial aneurysms (FIAs), i.e., aneurysms with a non-saccular, dilated form, occur in approximately 3-13% of all cases and therefore have not yet been as thoroughly studied. To improve the understanding of FIA hemodynamics, this pilot study contains morphological analyses and image-based blood flow simulations in three patient-specific cases. For a precise and realistic comparison to the pre-pathological state, each dilation was manually removed and the time-dependent blood flow simulations were repeated. Additionally, a validated fast virtual stenting approach was applied to evaluate the effect of virtual endovascular flow-diverter deployment focusing on relevant hemodynamic quantities. For two of the three patients, post-interventional information was available and included in the analysis. The results of this numerical pilot study indicate that complex flow structures, i.e., helical flow phenomena and the presence of high oscillating flow features, predominantly occur in FIAs with morphologically differing appearances. Due to the investigation of the individual healthy states, the original flow environment could be restored which serves as a reference for the virtual treatment target. It was shown that the realistic deployment led to a considerable stabilization of the individual hemodynamics in all cases. Furthermore, a quantification of the stent-induced therapy effect became feasible for the treating physician. The results of the morphological and hemodynamic analyses in this pilot study show that virtual stenting can be used in FIAs to quantify the effect of the planned endovascular treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35140672
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.771694
pmc: PMC8818669
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
771694Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Saalfeld, Stahl, Korte, Miller Marsh, Preim, Beuing, Cherednychenko, Behme and Berg.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
DB is a Proctor/Advisor: Phenox, Balt, Acandis, Thromb X, Perflow, Kaneka, Penumbra, outside of the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1982 Jan;45(1):29-36
pubmed: 7062068
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Oct;35(10):1849-57
pubmed: 24029393
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Jul;35(7):1254-62
pubmed: 23598838
Stroke. 2008 Nov;39(11):2997-3002
pubmed: 18688012
J Biomech. 2015 Nov 5;48(14):3846-52
pubmed: 26472308
Surg Neurol Int. 2018 Sep 20;9:189
pubmed: 30294493
J Neurosurg. 2012 Oct;117(4):774-80
pubmed: 22920960
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Feb;32(2):264-70
pubmed: 21051508
J Neurointerv Surg. 2021 Dec;13(12):1180-1186
pubmed: 33632878
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 13;7(1):5331
pubmed: 28706287
Vasc Surg. 1967 Sep;1(3):171-8
pubmed: 5299951
World Neurosurg. 2017 Feb;98:868.e5-868.e10
pubmed: 28017758
Biomed Eng Online. 2019 Jul 24;18(1):82
pubmed: 31340820
J Biomech Eng. 2014 Apr;136(4):
pubmed: 24292415
Stroke. 2013 Jul;44(7):2046-54
pubmed: 23798560
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Jun;11(6):614-617
pubmed: 30670624
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 Jul 1;47(1):E15
pubmed: 31261119
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018 Nov;13(11):1781-1793
pubmed: 30159832
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2008 Sep;44(3):116-23
pubmed: 19096660
J Neurosurg. 2018 May 4;130(3):923-935
pubmed: 29726768
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2018 Jan;13(1):83-93
pubmed: 28733907
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2020 Dec 14;13:1756286420966159
pubmed: 33403004
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2008 Nov;46(11):1097-112
pubmed: 19002516
J Neurosurg. 2003 Aug;99(2):228-40
pubmed: 12924694
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2019 Oct;14(10):1805-1813
pubmed: 31363984
J Neurosurg. 2005 Feb;102(2):355-62
pubmed: 15739566
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1958 Jul;17(3):409-23
pubmed: 13564252
BMC Neurol. 2016 Nov 18;16(1):231
pubmed: 27863464
J Neurosurg. 2005 Jan;102(1):72-9
pubmed: 15658099
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 03;9(12):e113762
pubmed: 25470724
World Neurosurg. 2019 Feb;122:e577-e583
pubmed: 31108073
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Mar;11(3):275-282
pubmed: 30061369
J Neurosurg. 2004 Jul;101(1):82-7
pubmed: 15255255