Impact on Quality of Life of Seton Placing in Perianal Crohn's Disease.

Often, in perineal Crohn's disease (CD), a seton is placed to guarantee a constant drainage and prevent septic complication while biologic therapy is ongoing. This study aimed to assess the long-term quality of life after surgery for perineal CD in relation to seton placing. Data of 65 consecutive patients with CD and non-CD operated on from 2014 to 2019 for perianal fistula or abscess were retrieved. Forty-three had CD and 14 of them had a seton placed during surgery and they kept it on while they had anti-TNF-alpha therapy. Patients were interviewed with the Cleveland Global Quality of Life (CGQL) and SF-12 quality of life questionnaires. Disease activity was defined as Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) and Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI). Comparisons between groups were carried out with the nonparametric tests, and multiple regression models were used to assess predictors of quality of life. The total CGQL score and SF-12 mental component score (MCS) were significantly higher (and thus better) in the seton group than in patients treated without seton. On the contrary, SF-12 physical component score (PCS) was not different between the two groups. HBI was significantly better in patients in the seton group. At multivariate analysis, seton placement and HBI were confirmed to be independent predictors of long-term SF-12 MCS whereas only HBI confirmed to be a predictor of total CGQL score. Seton placing during anti-TNF-alpha therapy is independently associated with a better MCS. Unexpectedly, this device, instead of to cause psychological distress, seems to assure patients during their biologic therapy providing psychological benefit beyond the mere medical effect.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Angriman, Tomassi, Ruffolo, Bordignon, Saadeh, Gruppo, Pucciarelli, Bardini and Scarpa.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The handling editor declared a past co-authorship with several of the authors IA, SP, and MS.