The performance of gelling fibre wound dressings under clinically relevant robotic laboratory tests.
exudate absorption and retention
material sorptivity
primary and secondary dressing pairs
structural strength and durability
testing standards
Journal
International wound journal
ISSN: 1742-481X
Titre abrégé: Int Wound J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101230907
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Sep 2022
Historique:
revised:
09
01
2022
received:
13
11
2021
accepted:
13
01
2022
pubmed:
11
2
2022
medline:
20
9
2022
entrez:
10
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The effectiveness of wound dressing performance in exudate management is commonly gauged in simple, non-realistic laboratory setups, typically, where dressing specimens are submersed in vessels containing aqueous solutions, rather than by means of clinically relevant test configurations. Specifically, two key fluid-structure interaction concepts: sorptivity-the ability of wound dressings to transfer exudate, including viscous fluids, away from the wound bed by capillary action and durability-the capacity of dressings to maintain their structural integrity over time and particularly, at removal events, have not been properly addressed in existing test protocols. The present article reviews our recent published research concerning the development of clinically relevant testing methods for wound dressings, focussing on the clinical relevance of the tests as well as on the standardisation and automation of laboratory measurements of dressing performance. A second objective of this work was to compile the experimental results characterising the performance of gelling fibre dressings, which were acquired using advanced testing methods, to demonstrate differences across products that apparently belong to the same "gelling fibre" family but differ remarkably in materials, structure and composition and, thereby, in performance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35142062
doi: 10.1111/iwj.13761
pmc: PMC9478960
doi:
Substances chimiques
Gels
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3-21Subventions
Organisme : Mölnlycke Health Care
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc (3M) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Int Wound J. 2021 Apr;18(2):194-208
pubmed: 33236856
Br J Dermatol. 2022 Aug;187(2):141-148
pubmed: 34549421
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Jun 01;29(3):433-439
pubmed: 28398589
Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:7616471
pubmed: 27990437
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Jun 26;6(6):190112
pubmed: 31312483
J Wound Care. 2016 Aug;25(8):452-62
pubmed: 27523657
J Wound Care. 2017 Apr 2;26(4):159-165
pubmed: 28379098
J Biomech Eng. 2007 Dec;129(6):924-30
pubmed: 18067398
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2022 Jun 1;35(6):326-334
pubmed: 35293376
Theranostics. 2014 Apr 30;4(7):721-35
pubmed: 24883122
Int Wound J. 2022 Feb;19(2):305-315
pubmed: 34132486
J Wound Care. 2020 Feb 1;29(Sup2c):S10-S16
pubmed: 32058838
Pharmaceutics. 2021 Oct 12;13(10):
pubmed: 34683959
Br J Nurs. 2016 Jan 28-Feb 10;25(2):102-9
pubmed: 27119542
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2007 Mar-Apr;34(2):153-7
pubmed: 17413830
J Wound Care. 2017 Jun 2;26(6):346-348
pubmed: 28598757
Wound Repair Regen. 2019 Jul;27(4):360-365
pubmed: 30920083
Br J Community Nurs. 2003;8(9 Suppl):suppl 4-9
pubmed: 14685963
Int Wound J. 2022 Sep;19 Suppl 1:3-21
pubmed: 35142062
Wound Repair Regen. 2020 Mar;28(2):242-265
pubmed: 31677314
J Wound Care. 2021 Jul 2;30(7):522-531
pubmed: 34256597
Br J Nurs. 2017 Nov 8;26(Sup20):S18-S24
pubmed: 29120684
J Wound Care. 2017 Jun 1;26(Sup6a):S1-S32
pubmed: 28594320
J Wound Care. 2020 Nov 2;29(11):622-623
pubmed: 33175619
Nurs Stand. 2019 Jan 25;34(2):77-82
pubmed: 31468844
Biomaterials. 1983 Oct;4(4):317-20
pubmed: 6640060
J Wound Care. 2016 Aug;25(8):428-37
pubmed: 27523654
Biomaterials. 1991 Apr;12(3):281-6
pubmed: 1854896
J Biomed Mater Res. 1994 Oct;28(10):1165-73
pubmed: 7530252
J Environ Sci Health B. 2016;51(4):222-9
pubmed: 26766747
Decubitus. 1991 Aug;4(3):47-8, 50, 52 passim
pubmed: 1872977
J Healthc Qual. 2021 May-Jun 01;43(3):137-144
pubmed: 33955955
Eplasty. 2014 Apr 02;14:e15
pubmed: 24741386
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2021 May;10(5):281-292
pubmed: 33733885
Surgeon. 2022 Aug;20(4):e144-e148
pubmed: 34373210
Int Wound J. 2019 Jun;16(3):634-640
pubmed: 30693644
Biosens Bioelectron. 2013 Mar 15;41:30-42
pubmed: 23058663
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2012 Mar;11(3-4):461-73
pubmed: 21744269
Med Eng Phys. 2019 Oct;72:13-18
pubmed: 31554571
Br Med J. 1976 Jun 12;1(6023):1444-5
pubmed: 953533
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jan 22;57(2):
pubmed: 33499251
Int Wound J. 2022 Mar;19(3):692-704
pubmed: 34382331
J Comp Eff Res. 2021 Apr;10(6):481-493
pubmed: 33605157
Br J Nurs. 1999 May 27-Jun 9;8(10):676-7, 680
pubmed: 10624199
Br J Community Nurs. 2003;8(11 Suppl):4-13
pubmed: 15115218
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 22;10(12):e045253
pubmed: 33371051
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2020 Nov/Dec;47(6):559-568
pubmed: 33201141
Diabet Med. 2001 Apr;18(4):320-4
pubmed: 11437864
Br J Nurs. 2020 Mar 12;29(5):S36-S38
pubmed: 32167820
Am J Surg. 1994 Jan;167(1A):2S-6S
pubmed: 8109679
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2013 Sep;2(7):348-356
pubmed: 24587972
Nat Methods. 2012 Jul;9(7):671-5
pubmed: 22930834
J Tissue Viability. 2021 Nov;30(4):478-483
pubmed: 34389188
J Pain. 2006 Apr;7(4):290-9
pubmed: 16618473
Wound Repair Regen. 2001 Nov-Dec;9(6):513-21
pubmed: 11896994
J Foot Ankle Res. 2020 Mar 24;13(1):16
pubmed: 32209136
Int Wound J. 2021 Oct;18(5):670-680
pubmed: 33605541
Int Wound J. 2020 Dec;17(6):1595-1606
pubmed: 32618418
J Wound Care. 2021 Sep 2;30(9):738-750
pubmed: 34554841
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Apr;131:104261
pubmed: 33611128