Culture-dependent and universal constructs and promoting factors for the process of personal recovery in users of mental health services: qualitative findings from Japan.
Culture
Japan
Mental illness
Personal recovery
Qualitative research
Journal
BMC psychiatry
ISSN: 1471-244X
Titre abrégé: BMC Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968559
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 02 2022
10 02 2022
Historique:
received:
20
02
2021
accepted:
28
01
2022
entrez:
11
2
2022
pubmed:
12
2
2022
medline:
12
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The conceptualization of personal recovery began in Europe and North America and has spread worldwide. However, the concept of personal recovery in addition to recovery-promoting factors may be influenced by culture. We explored how users of mental health services in Japan perceive their own personal recovery and the factors that promote it. We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus group interviews with individuals using mental health services. The interview data were analysed using thematic analysis with a grouped framework analysis approach. We used a coding framework based on the existing CHIME framework (connectedness, hope and optimism about the future, identity, meaning in life, and empowerment). Data were obtained from 30 users of mental health services (mean age: 40.4 years; 46.7% women; 50.0% with schizophrenia). "Compassion for others" was newly extracted in "Connectedness", and "Rebuilding/redefining identity not being as shaped by social norms" was newly extracted in "Identity" as personal recovery. "Positive experiences in childhood" (including positive parenting support from neighbours) was newly extracted as a recovery-promoting factor. Our unique findings on the rebuilding identity/defining identity free from conformity to social norms due to interactions with familiar people, including peers, may be culture dependent. This study raises overarching questions regarding how socio-cultural values influence the development of identity and personal values and how they are in turn reflected in personal recovery.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The conceptualization of personal recovery began in Europe and North America and has spread worldwide. However, the concept of personal recovery in addition to recovery-promoting factors may be influenced by culture. We explored how users of mental health services in Japan perceive their own personal recovery and the factors that promote it.
METHODS
We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus group interviews with individuals using mental health services. The interview data were analysed using thematic analysis with a grouped framework analysis approach. We used a coding framework based on the existing CHIME framework (connectedness, hope and optimism about the future, identity, meaning in life, and empowerment).
RESULTS
Data were obtained from 30 users of mental health services (mean age: 40.4 years; 46.7% women; 50.0% with schizophrenia). "Compassion for others" was newly extracted in "Connectedness", and "Rebuilding/redefining identity not being as shaped by social norms" was newly extracted in "Identity" as personal recovery. "Positive experiences in childhood" (including positive parenting support from neighbours) was newly extracted as a recovery-promoting factor.
CONCLUSIONS
Our unique findings on the rebuilding identity/defining identity free from conformity to social norms due to interactions with familiar people, including peers, may be culture dependent. This study raises overarching questions regarding how socio-cultural values influence the development of identity and personal values and how they are in turn reflected in personal recovery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35144562
doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03750-4
pii: 10.1186/s12888-022-03750-4
pmc: PMC8832737
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
105Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Front Psychol. 2014 Mar 05;5:135
pubmed: 24634663
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 29;19(1):102
pubmed: 30922292
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Sep;267:48-55
pubmed: 29883860
J Ment Health. 2013 Dec;22(6):563-9
pubmed: 24205790
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2012 Dec;21(4):353-64
pubmed: 22794507
Psychiatry. 2014 Spring;77(1):41-56
pubmed: 24575912
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Nov 7;17(1):360
pubmed: 29115928
J Ment Health. 2020 Sep 11;:1-17
pubmed: 32915681
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Jun;34(6):741-54
pubmed: 18359927
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;64(8):707-714
pubmed: 30411663
Lancet Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;4(4):268-270
pubmed: 28347425
J Affect Disord. 2021 Sep 1;292:375-385
pubmed: 34139411
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
Nord J Psychiatry. 2017 Oct;71(7):529-535
pubmed: 28696806
Science. 2011 May 27;332(6033):1100-4
pubmed: 21617077
Int J Eat Disord. 2020 Aug;53(8):1188-1203
pubmed: 32181532
Res Nurs Health. 2013 Aug;36(4):400-11
pubmed: 23744628
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(2):228-37
pubmed: 18394035
Community Ment Health J. 2018 Aug;54(6):793-804
pubmed: 29188393
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 9;20(1):12
pubmed: 31918708
J Ment Health. 2011 Aug;20(4):392-411
pubmed: 21770786
JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Nov 1;173(11):e193007
pubmed: 31498386
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Oct;64(10):974-80
pubmed: 23820592
World Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;13(1):12-20
pubmed: 24497237
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Nov;47(11):1827-35
pubmed: 22322983
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2019 Jun;42(2):169-181
pubmed: 30843721
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Sep;1(9):630-639
pubmed: 31024134
NPJ Schizophr. 2017 Mar 29;3:14
pubmed: 28560260
Int Psychogeriatr. 2007 Feb;19(1):77-88
pubmed: 16970832
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2015 Nov;61(7):660-7
pubmed: 25770201
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 13;11:24
pubmed: 32116841
Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;199(6):445-52
pubmed: 22130746
J Ment Health. 2017 Jun;26(3):291-304
pubmed: 27649767
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007 Feb;61(1):112-9
pubmed: 17239048
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 28;9(6):e029342
pubmed: 31256037
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7725):7
pubmed: 30283119