Willingness of French General Practitioners to Prescribe mHealth Apps and Devices: Quantitative Study.
connected health and wellness devices
general practitioners
health applications
mHealth
mobile phone
patients
prescription
quantitative study
Journal
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
ISSN: 2291-5222
Titre abrégé: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101624439
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 02 2022
11 02 2022
Historique:
received:
03
03
2021
accepted:
27
08
2021
revised:
25
06
2021
entrez:
11
2
2022
pubmed:
12
2
2022
medline:
17
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The field of mobile health (mHealth) is constantly expanding. Integrating mHealth apps and devices in clinical practice is a major and complex challenge. General practitioners (GPs) are an essential link in a patient's care pathway. As they are patients' preferred health care intermediaries, GPs play an important role in supporting patients' transition to mHealth. This study aims to identify the factors associated with the willingness of French GPs to prescribe mHealth apps and devices to their patients. This study was part of the ApiAppS project whose overall objective was to help remove barriers GPs face when prescribing mHealth apps and devices by developing a custom-built platform to aid them. The study included GPs recruited from the general practice department of several medical faculties in France (Lyon, Nice, and Rouen) and mailing lists of academic GPs, health care professional associations, and social and professional networks. Participants were asked to complete a web-based questionnaire that collected data on various sociodemographic variables, indicators of their involvement in continued education programs and the amount of time they dedicated to promoting healthy behaviors during patient consultations, and indicators characterizing their patient population. Data on their perceptions of mHealth apps and devices were also collected. Finally, the questionnaire included items to measure GPs' acceptability of prescribing mHealth apps and devices for several health-related dimensions. Of the 174 GPs, 129 (74.1%) declared their willingness to prescribe mHealth apps and devices to their patients. In multivariate analysis, involvement in continued education programs (odds ratio [OR] 6.17, 95% CI 1.52-28.72), a better patient base command of the French language (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.13-1.88), GP-perceived benefits of mHealth apps and devices for both patients and their medical practice and GP-perceived drivers for mHealth apps and device implementation in their medical practice (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07), and validation of mHealth apps and devices through randomized clinical trials (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04) were all associated with GPs' willingness to prescribe mHealth apps and devices. In contrast, older GPs (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.98), female GPs (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.09-0.69), and those who perceived risks for the patient or their medical practice (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.99) were less inclined to prescribe mHealth apps and devices. mHealth apps and devices were generally seen by GPs as useful in general medicine and were, for the most part, favorable to prescribing them. Their full integration in general medicine will be conditioned by the need for conclusive certification, transparency (reliable and precise data concerning mHealth app and device methods of construction and clinical validation), software aids to assist GPs prescribe them, and dedicated training programs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The field of mobile health (mHealth) is constantly expanding. Integrating mHealth apps and devices in clinical practice is a major and complex challenge. General practitioners (GPs) are an essential link in a patient's care pathway. As they are patients' preferred health care intermediaries, GPs play an important role in supporting patients' transition to mHealth.
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to identify the factors associated with the willingness of French GPs to prescribe mHealth apps and devices to their patients.
METHODS
This study was part of the ApiAppS project whose overall objective was to help remove barriers GPs face when prescribing mHealth apps and devices by developing a custom-built platform to aid them. The study included GPs recruited from the general practice department of several medical faculties in France (Lyon, Nice, and Rouen) and mailing lists of academic GPs, health care professional associations, and social and professional networks. Participants were asked to complete a web-based questionnaire that collected data on various sociodemographic variables, indicators of their involvement in continued education programs and the amount of time they dedicated to promoting healthy behaviors during patient consultations, and indicators characterizing their patient population. Data on their perceptions of mHealth apps and devices were also collected. Finally, the questionnaire included items to measure GPs' acceptability of prescribing mHealth apps and devices for several health-related dimensions.
RESULTS
Of the 174 GPs, 129 (74.1%) declared their willingness to prescribe mHealth apps and devices to their patients. In multivariate analysis, involvement in continued education programs (odds ratio [OR] 6.17, 95% CI 1.52-28.72), a better patient base command of the French language (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.13-1.88), GP-perceived benefits of mHealth apps and devices for both patients and their medical practice and GP-perceived drivers for mHealth apps and device implementation in their medical practice (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07), and validation of mHealth apps and devices through randomized clinical trials (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04) were all associated with GPs' willingness to prescribe mHealth apps and devices. In contrast, older GPs (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.98), female GPs (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.09-0.69), and those who perceived risks for the patient or their medical practice (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.99) were less inclined to prescribe mHealth apps and devices.
CONCLUSIONS
mHealth apps and devices were generally seen by GPs as useful in general medicine and were, for the most part, favorable to prescribing them. Their full integration in general medicine will be conditioned by the need for conclusive certification, transparency (reliable and precise data concerning mHealth app and device methods of construction and clinical validation), software aids to assist GPs prescribe them, and dedicated training programs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35147508
pii: v10i2e28372
doi: 10.2196/28372
pmc: PMC9491832
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e28372Informations de copyright
©Claire Della Vecchia, Tanguy Leroy, Charlotte Bauquier, Myriam Pannard, Aline Sarradon-Eck, David Darmon, Jean-Charles Dufour, Marie Preau. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org), 11.02.2022.
Références
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 10;10:2791
pubmed: 31920836
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Oct 04;18(10):e264
pubmed: 27702738
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Dec 21;5(12):e193
pubmed: 29269336
Mhealth. 2018 Sep 30;4:44
pubmed: 30363764
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Jul 14;8(7):e14795
pubmed: 32459630
Int J Clin Pract. 2019 May;73(5):e13345
pubmed: 30884059
Health Informatics J. 2016 Dec;22(4):1111-1120
pubmed: 26635324
J Med Internet Res. 2004 Sep 29;6(3):e34
pubmed: 15471760
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Mar 4;9(3):e21795
pubmed: 33661123
Psychometrika. 1965 Jun;30:179-85
pubmed: 14306381
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jan;23(1):212-20
pubmed: 26078410
Eur J Gen Pract. 2010 Mar;16(1):42-50
pubmed: 20100109
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:1919-1920
pubmed: 31438407
JMIR Med Inform. 2016 Apr 06;4(2):e11
pubmed: 27052805
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2017 Aug;30(4):439-452
pubmed: 28116773
Fam Pract. 2021 Jun 17;38(3):210-217
pubmed: 32968795
Health Serv Insights. 2013 Aug 04;6:61-8
pubmed: 25114561
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2021 May;171(7-8):148-156
pubmed: 33570692
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2019 Jan;26(1):57-58
pubmed: 31157099
Int J Med Inform. 2007 Jan;76(1):66-77
pubmed: 16901749
Telemed J E Health. 2014 Jan;20(1):39-46
pubmed: 24161004
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Oct;130:103948
pubmed: 31442846
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jun 3;7(6):e13199
pubmed: 31199343
BMJ. 1997 Feb 22;314(7080):572
pubmed: 9055718
Cureus. 2019 Feb 20;11(2):e4104
pubmed: 31057998
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jun 1;8(6):e16497
pubmed: 32478660
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Mar 28;7(3):e12179
pubmed: 30920383
N Engl J Med. 2001 Jun 28;344(26):2021-5
pubmed: 11430334
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 Jun 21;6(6):e10701
pubmed: 29929948
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 30;8(7):e17447
pubmed: 32729839
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 May 9;1:12
pubmed: 31304297
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76
pubmed: 26828106