Refining M1 stage in medulloblastoma: criteria for cerebrospinal fluid cytology and implications for improved risk stratification from the HIT-2000 trial.
Cerebrospinal fluid
Cytospin preparation
Medulloblastoma
Quality assurance
Staging
Journal
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
ISSN: 1879-0852
Titre abrégé: Eur J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9005373
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2022
03 2022
Historique:
received:
26
10
2021
revised:
21
12
2021
accepted:
27
12
2021
pubmed:
13
2
2022
medline:
22
4
2022
entrez:
12
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant paediatric brain tumour, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dissemination (M1 stage) is a high-risk prognostic factor. Criteria for CSF evaluation and for differentiating M0 from M1 stage are not clearly defined, and the prognostic significance of M1 stage in this context is unknown. CSF investigations from 405 patients with medulloblastoma of the prospective multicenter trial HIT-2000 (HIirnTumor-2000) were reviewed. Data from 213 patients aged ≥4 years were related to 5-year progression-free (5y-PFS) and overall survival. Patients with cytological tumour dissemination only (M1 stage only) aged ≥4 years (n = 18) and patients with radiologically detected metastases (M2/3, n = 85) showed a worse 5y-PFS than M0 patients (n = 110) without signs of metastatic disease (5y-PFS 61.1% and 59.6% vs 80.7%; p < 0.02 and p < 0.01, log rank). Patients with positive samples drawn early after surgery who turned negative within 14 days postoperatively (n = 9) and patients with atypical cells (n = 6) showed a 5y-PFS similar to M0 patients. No tumour cells were detected in samples containing <10 nucleated cells. Analysis of cytological criteria showed a better predictive value for tumour cell clusters than ≥2 individual tumour cells. Based on our results, we suggest that CSF medulloblastoma staging should be performed 14 days postoperatively by lumbar puncture, and specimens should contain at least 10 nucleated cells. Cytological tumour dissemination alone (M1 stage only) appears a high-risk prognostic factor associated with an outcome comparable to M2/M3 stage. Tumour cell clusters seem to have a greater impact on prognosis than single tumour cells. This should be validated further.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant paediatric brain tumour, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dissemination (M1 stage) is a high-risk prognostic factor. Criteria for CSF evaluation and for differentiating M0 from M1 stage are not clearly defined, and the prognostic significance of M1 stage in this context is unknown.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
CSF investigations from 405 patients with medulloblastoma of the prospective multicenter trial HIT-2000 (HIirnTumor-2000) were reviewed. Data from 213 patients aged ≥4 years were related to 5-year progression-free (5y-PFS) and overall survival.
RESULTS
Patients with cytological tumour dissemination only (M1 stage only) aged ≥4 years (n = 18) and patients with radiologically detected metastases (M2/3, n = 85) showed a worse 5y-PFS than M0 patients (n = 110) without signs of metastatic disease (5y-PFS 61.1% and 59.6% vs 80.7%; p < 0.02 and p < 0.01, log rank). Patients with positive samples drawn early after surgery who turned negative within 14 days postoperatively (n = 9) and patients with atypical cells (n = 6) showed a 5y-PFS similar to M0 patients. No tumour cells were detected in samples containing <10 nucleated cells. Analysis of cytological criteria showed a better predictive value for tumour cell clusters than ≥2 individual tumour cells.
CONCLUSION
Based on our results, we suggest that CSF medulloblastoma staging should be performed 14 days postoperatively by lumbar puncture, and specimens should contain at least 10 nucleated cells. Cytological tumour dissemination alone (M1 stage only) appears a high-risk prognostic factor associated with an outcome comparable to M2/M3 stage. Tumour cell clusters seem to have a greater impact on prognosis than single tumour cells. This should be validated further.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35151105
pii: S0959-8049(22)00004-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.12.032
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
30-38Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest statement The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.