Dropout from treatment for mental disorders in six countries of the Americas: A regional report from the World Mental Health Surveys.
Latin America
Treatment adherence
Treatment barriers
Treatment dropout
Journal
Journal of affective disorders
ISSN: 1573-2517
Titre abrégé: J Affect Disord
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7906073
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 04 2022
15 04 2022
Historique:
received:
31
05
2021
revised:
20
12
2021
accepted:
09
02
2022
pubmed:
14
2
2022
medline:
21
4
2022
entrez:
13
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To estimate structural and attitudinal reasons for premature discontinuation of mental health treatment, socio-demographic and clinical correlates of treatment dropout due to these reasons, and to test country differences from the overall effect across the region of the Americas. World Health Organization-World Mental Health (WMH) surveys were carried out in six countries in the Americas: Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, Peru and USA. Among the 1991 participants who met diagnostic criteria (measured with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMHCIDI)) for a mental disorder and were in treatment in the prior 12-months, the 236 (12.2%) who dropped out of treatment before the professional recommended were included. In all countries, individuals more frequently reported attitudinal (79.2%) rather than structural reasons (30.7%) for dropout. Disorder severity was associated with structural reasons; those with severe disorder (versus mild disorder) had 3.4 (95%CI=1.1-11.1) times the odds of reporting a structural reason. Regarding attitudinal reasons, those with lower income (versus higher income) were less likely to discontinue treatment because of getting better (OR=0.4; 95%CI= 0.2-0.9). Country specific variations were found. Not all countries, or the poorest, in the region were included. Some estimations couldn´t be calculated due to cell size. Causality cannot be assumed. Clinicians should in the first sessions address attitudinal factors that may lead to premature termination. Public policies need to consider distribution of services to increase convenience. A more rational use of resources would be to offer brief therapies to individuals most likely to drop out of treatment prematurely.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35151675
pii: S0165-0327(22)00164-1
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.02.019
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
168-179Subventions
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH070884
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R13 MH066849
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01 MH069864
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : R01 DA016558
Pays : United States
Organisme : FIC NIH HHS
ID : R03 TW006481
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.