Metabolizing status of CYP2C19 in response and side effects to medications for depression: Results from a naturalistic study.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 genes (CYP450) were demonstrated to play a significant role in antidepressant response and side effects, but their effect in real-world clinical practice is poorly known. We determined the metabolic status of CYP2C19 based on the combination of *1, *2, *3 and *17 alleles extracted from genome-wide data in 1239 patients with MDD, pharmacologically treated in a naturalistic setting. Symptom improvement and side effects were assessed using the Montgomery and Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelse scale, respectively. We tested if symptom improvement, response and side effects were associated with CYP2C19 metabolic status adjusting for potential confounders. We considered patients treated with drugs for depression having CYP2C19 genotyping recommended by guidelines (T1 Drugs); secondarily, with all psychotropic drugs having CYP2C19 as relevant metabolic path (T2 Drugs). In the group treated with T1 drugs (n = 540), poor metabolizers (PMs) showed higher response and higher symptom improvement compared to normal metabolizers (p = 0.023 and p = 0.009, respectively), but also higher risk of autonomic and neurological side effects (p = 0.022 and p = 0.022 respectively). In patients treated with T2 drugs (n = 801), similar results were found. No associations between metabolizer status and other types of side effects were found (psychic and other side effects). Our study suggests potential advantages of CYP2C19 pharmacogenetic testing to guide treatment prescription, that may not be limited to the drugs currently recommended by guidelines.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest Dr. Souery D. has received grant/research support from GlaxoSmithKline and Lundbeck; has served as a consultant or on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen and Lundbeck. Prof. Montgomery S. has been a consultant or served on Advisory boards: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Forest, Johnson & Johnson, Leo, Lundbeck, Medelink, Neurim, Pierre Fabre, and Richter. Prof. Kasper S. received grants/research support, consulting fees and/or honoraria within the last three years from Angelini, AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG, Celegne GmbH, Eli Lilly, Janssen-Cilag Pharma GmbH, KRKA-Pharma, Lundbeck A/S, Mundipharma, Neuraxpharm, Pfizer, Sanofi, Schwabe, Servier, Shire, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co. Ltd. and Takeda. Prof. Zohar J. has received grant/research support from Lundbeck, Servier, Brainsway and Pfizer, has served as a consultant or on advisory boards for Servier, Pfizer, Abbott, Lilly, Actelion, AstraZeneca and Roche, and has served on speakers’ bureaus for Lundbeck, Roch, Lilly, Servier, Pfizer and Abbott. Prof. Ferentinos P. received grants/research support, consulting fees and/or honoraria within the last three years from Angelini, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Janssen, Medochemie, Vianex and Servier. Prof. Mendlewicz J. is a member of the Board of the Lundbeck International Neuroscience Foundation and of Advisory Board of Servier. Prof. Serretti A. is or has been consultant/speaker for: Abbott, Abbvie, Angelini, Astra Zeneca, Clinical Data, Boheringer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Innovapharma, Italfarmaco, Janssen, Lundbeck, Naurex, Pfizer, Polifarma, Sanofi, Servier and Taliaz. Dr. Fabbri C. was a speaker for Janssen. The other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.