The DNA damage repair landscape in Black women with breast cancer.
DNA repair mechanism mutations
breast cancer
hormone receptor-positive breast cancer
hormone therapy
metastasis
Journal
Therapeutic advances in medical oncology
ISSN: 1758-8340
Titre abrégé: Ther Adv Med Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101510808
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
16
07
2021
accepted:
06
01
2022
entrez:
14
2
2022
pubmed:
15
2
2022
medline:
15
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies in women irrespective of their race or ethnicity. While Black women with ER+ breast cancer are 42% more likely to die of their disease than White women, molecular mechanisms underlying this disparate outcome are understudied. Recent studies identify DNA damage repair (DDR) genes as a new class of endocrine therapy resistance driver that contributes to poor survival among ER+ breast cancer patients. Here, we systematically analyze DDR regulation in the tumors and normal breast of Black women and its impact on survival outcome. Mutation and up/downregulation of 104 DDR genes in breast tumor and normal samples from Black patients relative to White counterparts was assessed. For DDR genes that were differently regulated in the tumor samples from Black women in multiple datasets associations with survival outcome were tested. Overall, Black patient tumors upregulate or downregulate RNA levels of a wide array of single strand break repair (SSBR) genes relative to their white counterparts and uniformly upregulate double strand break repair (DSBR) genes. This DSBR upregulation was also detectable in samples of normal breast tissue from Black women. Eight candidate DDR genes were reproducibly differently regulated in tumors from Black women and associated with poor survival. A unique DDR signature comprised of simultaneous upregulation of homologous recombination gene expression and downregulation of SSBR genes was enriched in Black patients. This signature associated with cell cycle dysregulation ( These results constitute the first systematic analysis of DDR regulation in Black women and provide strong rationale for refining biomarker profiles to ensure precision medicine for underserved populations.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed malignancies in women irrespective of their race or ethnicity. While Black women with ER+ breast cancer are 42% more likely to die of their disease than White women, molecular mechanisms underlying this disparate outcome are understudied. Recent studies identify DNA damage repair (DDR) genes as a new class of endocrine therapy resistance driver that contributes to poor survival among ER+ breast cancer patients. Here, we systematically analyze DDR regulation in the tumors and normal breast of Black women and its impact on survival outcome.
METHOD
METHODS
Mutation and up/downregulation of 104 DDR genes in breast tumor and normal samples from Black patients relative to White counterparts was assessed. For DDR genes that were differently regulated in the tumor samples from Black women in multiple datasets associations with survival outcome were tested.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall, Black patient tumors upregulate or downregulate RNA levels of a wide array of single strand break repair (SSBR) genes relative to their white counterparts and uniformly upregulate double strand break repair (DSBR) genes. This DSBR upregulation was also detectable in samples of normal breast tissue from Black women. Eight candidate DDR genes were reproducibly differently regulated in tumors from Black women and associated with poor survival. A unique DDR signature comprised of simultaneous upregulation of homologous recombination gene expression and downregulation of SSBR genes was enriched in Black patients. This signature associated with cell cycle dysregulation (
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
These results constitute the first systematic analysis of DDR regulation in Black women and provide strong rationale for refining biomarker profiles to ensure precision medicine for underserved populations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35154416
doi: 10.1177/17588359221075458
pii: 10.1177_17588359221075458
pmc: PMC8829704
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
17588359221075458Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA030199
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s), 2022.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr Haricharan has a provisional patent (US 63/106777) for using DNA repair genes as a biomarker for patient outcome. Dr Freedland is a consultant to Pfizer, Janssen, Astra Zeneca, Merck, and Clovis. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001 Mar;10(3):217-22
pubmed: 11303590
Oncogene. 1999 Dec 20;18(55):7883-99
pubmed: 10630641
Breast Cancer Res. 2009;11(5):R77
pubmed: 19874578
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 21;9(10):e110281
pubmed: 25333877
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jul 15;101(14):993-1000
pubmed: 19584327
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Feb 1;90(3):1112-6
pubmed: 8430082
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Feb;174(1):271-278
pubmed: 30465154
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Mar 7;104(5):406-14
pubmed: 22250182
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Jul;146(1):211-20
pubmed: 24839032
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Sep 7;86(17):1352-3
pubmed: 8064896
Nat Commun. 2018 Oct 16;9(1):4181
pubmed: 30327465
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;3(12):1654-1662
pubmed: 28472234
Cancer Causes Control. 2020 Mar;31(3):221-230
pubmed: 31950321
Nature. 2000 Aug 17;406(6797):747-52
pubmed: 10963602
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jul;152(2):437-48
pubmed: 26109344
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Jan 1;26(1):3-5
pubmed: 31690650
Adv Cancer Res. 2010;108:73-112
pubmed: 21034966
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Jul 1;113(7):884-892
pubmed: 33151324
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Oct 1;24(19):4887-4899
pubmed: 29793947
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Nov;69(6):438-451
pubmed: 31577379
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Feb;24(2):406-14
pubmed: 25465802
Nature. 2009 Oct 22;461(7267):1071-8
pubmed: 19847258
Cancer Cell. 2020 Apr 13;37(4):496-513
pubmed: 32289273
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;36(1):14-24
pubmed: 29035645
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jul 10;33(20):2254-61
pubmed: 25964252
Cancer Discov. 2012 May;2(5):401-4
pubmed: 22588877
Mol Cancer Ther. 2004 Sep;3(9):1147-57
pubmed: 15367709
Trends Cell Biol. 2016 Jan;26(1):52-64
pubmed: 26437586
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov;26(12):3838-3845
pubmed: 31410609
Ethn Dis. 2016 Jul 21;26(3):407-16
pubmed: 27440982
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Jun;163(2):321-330
pubmed: 28251385
Cancer. 2007 May 15;109(10):2093-9
pubmed: 17420982
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 Jul;13(7):417-30
pubmed: 27030077
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Oct;21(10):1735-44
pubmed: 22859400
Mol Cancer Ther. 2008 May;7(5):1246-50
pubmed: 18483312
Am J Epidemiol. 2016 May 15;183(10):884-93
pubmed: 27076668
Breast J. 2003 May-Jun;9(3):175-83
pubmed: 12752625
Am J Public Health. 2010 Jan;100(1):146-51
pubmed: 19150917
Cancer Discov. 2017 Oct;7(10):1168-1183
pubmed: 28801307
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Feb 1;110(2):
pubmed: 28859290
Cancer Causes Control. 2016 Feb;27(2):229-36
pubmed: 26621544
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Nov;154(1):145-54
pubmed: 26458823
Oncologist. 2021 Feb;26 Suppl 2:S3-S4
pubmed: 33399245
Breast Cancer Res. 2013 Jun 27;15(3):208
pubmed: 23826992
BMC Cancer. 2013 May 04;13:225
pubmed: 23642215
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2001 Jul;68(1):33-43
pubmed: 11678307