The effectiveness of the early orthodontic correction of functional unilateral posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition period: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Crossbite Functional shift Interceptive orthodontics Meta-analysis Mixed dentition

Journal

Progress in orthodontics
ISSN: 2196-1042
Titre abrégé: Prog Orthod
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 100936353

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Feb 2022
Historique:
received: 09 08 2021
accepted: 05 01 2022
entrez: 14 2 2022
pubmed: 15 2 2022
medline: 16 2 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to critically appraise the available evidence of the effectiveness of early intervention of functional unilateral posterior crossbites (FPXB) between the ages of 6 and 12 years. Electronic search in four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) was performed between 1 Nine studies (6 RCTs and 3 CCTs) were included in this review, and six of them were appropriate for quantitative synthesis. The meta-analysis revealed that the quad-helix (QH) was more effective than expansion plates (EP) in increasing the intermolar width (WMD = 1.25; 95% CI 0.75, 1.75; P < 0.001), and decreasing treatment time (WMD = - 3.36; 95% CI - 4.97, - 1.75; P < 0.001). The relapse rate at 5.6 years post-treatment was greater in the QH group than in the EP group (RR = 3.00); however, the difference was statistically insignificant. There was no significant difference between the QH and the EP in other outcome measures. When assessing the rapid maxillary expansion (RME), only one RCT compared the RME with an untreated control group and reported a significant increase in the maxillary intermolar and intercanine width (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively) and a significant decrease in lower midline deviation (P < 0.001). There is weak to moderate evidence that the treatment of functional posterior crossbite (FPXB) by the QH increased the maxillary intermolar width and the success rate and decreased the treatment duration compared to the EP. The relapse percentage was greater in the QH group. There is very weak evidence that the mandibular midline correction rate did not differ significantly between the QH and the EP modalities. The RME using the Hyrax appliance corrected the FPXB successfully; however, the strength of evidence in this regard is very low. As the quality of evidence ranged from very low to moderate in this review, we confirm the need for more RCTs with different expansion appliances in the early treatment of FPXB.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35156156
doi: 10.1186/s40510-022-00398-4
pii: 10.1186/s40510-022-00398-4
pmc: PMC8841381
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Review Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

5

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Kutin G, Hawes RR. Posterior cross-bites in the deciduous and mixed dentitions. Am J Orthod. 1969;56(5):491–504.
pubmed: 5261162
Egermark-Eriksson I, Carlsson GE, Magnusson T, Thilander B. A longitudinal study on malocclusion in relation to signs and symptoms of cranio-mandibular disorders in children and adolescents. Eur J Orthod. 1990;12(4):399–407.
pubmed: 2086260
Heikinheimo K, Salmi K. Need for orthodontic intervention in five-year-old Finnish children. Proc Finnish Dent Soc Suomen Hammaslaakariseuran toimituksia. 1987;83(4):165–9.
pubmed: 3484325
Thilander B, Wahlund S, Lennartsson B. The effect of early interceptive treatment in children with posterior cross-bite. Eur J Orthod. 1984;6(1):25–34.
pubmed: 6583062
Kurol J, Berglund L. Longitudinal study and cost-benefit analysis of the effect of early treatment of posterior cross-bites in the primary dentition. Eur J Orthod. 1992;14(3):173–9.
pubmed: 1628683
Godoy F, Godoy-Bezerra J, Rosenblatt A. Treatment of posterior crossbite comparing 2 appliances: a community-based trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011;139(1):e45-52.
Larsson E. The effect of dummy-sucking on the occlusion: a review. Eur J Orthod. 1986;8(2):127–30.
pubmed: 3522253
Behlfelt K, Linder-Aronson S, McWilliam J, Neander P, Laage-Hellman J. Dentition in children with enlarged tonsils compared to control children. Eur J Orthod. 1989;11(4):416–29.
pubmed: 2591488
Preethi K, Rajkumar B, Nagalakshmi S, Rameshkumar K. Correction of morphological and positional asymmetry in early mixed dentition with functional unilateral crossbite. Int J Orthod Rehabil. 2020;11(2):82–7.
Schroder U, Schroder I. Early treatment of unilateral posterior crossbite in children with bilaterally contracted maxillae. Eur J Orthod. 1984;6(1):65–9.
pubmed: 6583066
Hesse KL, Artun J, Joondeph DR, Kennedy DB. Changes in condylar postition and occlusion associated with maxillary expansion for correction of functional unilateral posterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1997;111(4):410–8.
Godoy F, Rosenblatt A, Godoy-Bezerra J. Temporomandibular disorders and associated factors in Brazilian teenagers: a cross-sectional study. Int J Prosthod. 2007;20(6):599–604.
Ninou S, Stephens C. The early treatment of posterior crossbites: a review of continuing controversies. Dent Update. 1994;21(10):420–6.
pubmed: 7641949
Pinto AS, Buschang PH, Throckmorton GS, Chen P. Morphological and positional asymmetries of young children with functional unilateral posterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2001;120(5):513–20.
Lam PH, Sadowsky C, Omerza F. Mandibular asymmetry and condylar position in children with unilateral posterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1999;115(5):569–75.
Harrison JE, Ashby D. Orthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000979 .
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000979 pubmed: 11279699
Kennedy DB, Osepchook M. Unilateral posterior crossbite with mandibular shift: a review. Journal. 2005;71(8):569–73.
Tsanidis N, Antonarakis GS, Kiliaridis S. Functional changes after early treatment of unilateral posterior cross-bite associated with mandibular shift: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2016;43(1):59–68.
pubmed: 26257271
Agostino P, Ugolini A, Signori A, Silvestrini-Biavati A, Harrison JE, Riley P. Orthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000979.pub2 .
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000979.pub2 pubmed: 25104166
Caroccia F, Moscagiuri F, Falconio L, Festa F, D’Attilio M. Early orthodontic treatments of unilateral posterior crossbite: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2020;10(1):33.
pmcid: 7795353
Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2019.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):e1-34.
pubmed: 19631507
Higgins JP, Altman DG, Cotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:5928.
Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(9):712–6.
pubmed: 12956787
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60.
pubmed: 12958120 pmcid: 192859
Guyatt GH, Thorlund K, Oxman AD, Walter SD, Patrick D, Furukawa TA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing summary of findings tables and evidence profiles-continuous outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(2):173–83.
pubmed: 23116689
GRADEproGDT. GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool [Software] McMaster University; 2020. (developed by Evidence Prime, Inc). Available from gradepro.org.].
Piancino MG, Cordero-Ricardo M, Cannavale R, Vallelonga T, Garagiola U, Merlo A. Improvement of masticatory kinematic parameters after correction of unilateral posterior crossbite: Reasons for functional retention. Angle Orthod. 2017;87(6):871–7.
pubmed: 28771046 pmcid: 8317566
Galbiati G, Maspero C, Giannini L, Tagliatesta C, Farronato G. Functional evaluation in young patients undergoing orthopedical interceptive treatment. Minerva Stomatol. 2016;65(5):276–83.
pubmed: 27580652
Ugolini A, Doldo T, Ghislanzoni LT, Mapelli A, Giorgetti R, Sforza C. Rapid palatal expansion effects on mandibular transverse dimensions in unilateral posterior crossbite patients: a three-dimensional digital imaging study. Prog Orthod. 2016;17:1.
pubmed: 26746202 pmcid: 4706536
Weyrich C, Noss M, Lisson JA. Comparison of a modified RME appliance with other appliances for transverse maxillary expansion. J Orofacial Orthop = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie. 2010;71(4):265–72.
Cozzani M, Rosa M, Cozzani P, Siciliani G. Deciduous dentition-anchored rapid maxillary expansion in crossbite and non-crossbite mixed dentition patients: reaction of the permanent first molar. Prog Orthod. 2003;4:15–22.
pubmed: 12887575
Lippold C, Moiseenko T, Drerup B, Schilgen M, Vegh A, Danesh G. Spine deviations and orthodontic treatment of asymmetric malocclusions in children. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:151.
pubmed: 22906114 pmcid: 3489858
Illipronti-Filho E, Fantini SM, Chilvarquer I. Evaluation of mandibular condyles in children with unilateral posterior crossbite. Braz Oral Res. 2015;29:49.
pubmed: 25760067
Ramoglu SI, Sari Z. Maxillary expansion in the mixed dentition: rapid or semi-rapid? Eur J Orthod. 2010;32(1):11–8.
pubmed: 19797410
Tonni I, Iannazzi A, Piancino MG, Costantinides F, Dalessandri D, Paganelli C. Asymmetric molars’ mesial rotation and mesialization in unilateral functional posterior crossbite and implications for interceptive treatment in the mixed dentition. Eur J Orthod. 2017;39(4):433–9.
pubmed: 28040681
Adly MS, Adly AS, Adly AS. Assessment of early orthodontic treatment on functional shifts by telemonitoring mandibular movements using a smart phone. J Telemed Telecare. 2020;26(3):150–60.
pubmed: 30373447
Sandikcioglu M, Hazar S. Skeletal and dental changes after maxillary expansion in the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1997;111(3):321–7.
Boysen B, La Cour K, Athanasiou AE, Gjessing PE. Three-dimensional evaluation of dentoskeletal changes after posterior cross-bite correction by quad-helix or removable appliances. Br J Orthod. 1992;19(2):97–107.
pubmed: 1627533
Brin I, Ben-Bassat Y, Blustein Y, Ehrlich J, Hochman N, Marmary Y, et al. Skeletal and functional effects of treatment for unilateral posterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1996;109(2):173–9.
Bjerklin K. Follow-up control of patients with unilateral posterior cross-bite treated with expansion plates or the quad-helix appliance. J Orofacial Orthop = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie: Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie. 2000;61(2):112–24.
Petren S, Bondemark L. Correction of unilateral posterior crossbite in the mixed dentition: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2008;133(6):790.e7-13.e7.
Petren S, Bjerklin K, Bondemark L. Stability of unilateral posterior crossbite correction in the mixed dentition: a randomized clinical trial with a 3-year follow-up. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011;139(1):e73-81.
Lippold C, Stamm T, Meyer U, Vegh A, Moiseenko T, Danesh G. Early treatment of posterior crossbite—a randomised clinical trial. Trials. 2013;14:20.
pubmed: 23339736 pmcid: 3560255
Sollenius O, Golez A, Primozic J, Ovsenik M, Bondemark L, Petren S. Three-dimensional evaluation of forced unilateral posterior crossbite correction in the mixed dentition: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Orthod. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjz054 .
doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz054 pubmed: 29878165
Sollenius O, Petren S, Bondemark L. An RCT on clinical effectiveness and cost analysis of correction of unilateral posterior crossbite with functional shift in specialist and general dentistry. Eur J Orthod. 2020;42(1):44–51.
pubmed: 31067324

Auteurs

Danya Hassan Alsawaf (DH)

Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria.

Salam Ghazwan Almaasarani (SG)

Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria.

Mohammad Y Hajeer (MY)

Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria. myhajeer@gmail.com.

Nada Rajeh (N)

Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH