Radiological Evaluation Criteria for Chronic Subdural Hematomas : Review of the Literature.
Embolization
Intracranial hemorrhage
Middle meningeal artery
Midline shift
Subdural hematoma
Journal
Clinical neuroradiology
ISSN: 1869-1447
Titre abrégé: Clin Neuroradiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101526693
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
19
08
2021
accepted:
05
01
2022
pubmed:
15
2
2022
medline:
15
12
2022
entrez:
14
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The methodology of measuring chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) extent and its effect on intracranial structures is relevant for patient classification and outcome measurements and affects the external validity of cSDH studies. With embolization of the middle meningeal artery (MMA) as a possible treatment of cSDHs, the topic has gained substantial interest. We sought to summarize the heterogeneity of radiologic measurements, specifically in the evaluation of cSDHs based on literature review. In this review, we identified and described the most common radiological methodologies for measurements of cSDH thickness, cSDH volume and of midline shift. There are numerous published methods on how to evaluate cSDH thickness, cSDH volume and midline shift but no common standard. The definition of measurement methods and reporting standards for MMA embolization in cSDH patients and their validation needs to be addressed.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The methodology of measuring chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) extent and its effect on intracranial structures is relevant for patient classification and outcome measurements and affects the external validity of cSDH studies. With embolization of the middle meningeal artery (MMA) as a possible treatment of cSDHs, the topic has gained substantial interest. We sought to summarize the heterogeneity of radiologic measurements, specifically in the evaluation of cSDHs based on literature review.
METHODS
METHODS
In this review, we identified and described the most common radiological methodologies for measurements of cSDH thickness, cSDH volume and of midline shift.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
There are numerous published methods on how to evaluate cSDH thickness, cSDH volume and midline shift but no common standard. The definition of measurement methods and reporting standards for MMA embolization in cSDH patients and their validation needs to be addressed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35157088
doi: 10.1007/s00062-022-01138-1
pii: 10.1007/s00062-022-01138-1
pmc: PMC9744701
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
923-929Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Apr;162(4):777-784
pubmed: 32086603
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Apr 1;36(7):1080-1092
pubmed: 30259789
Neurosurg Focus. 2003 Oct 15;15(4):E6
pubmed: 15344899
Surg Neurol. 2006 Aug;66(2):178-82; discussion 182
pubmed: 16876620
Int J Biomed Imaging. 2018 Apr 12;2018:4303161
pubmed: 29849536
Korean J Neurotrauma. 2014 Oct;10(2):55-9
pubmed: 27169034
Stroke. 1996 Aug;27(8):1304-5
pubmed: 8711791
J Neurotrauma. 2016 Jul 1;33(13):1212-9
pubmed: 26295586
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 26;13(6):e0199809
pubmed: 29944717
Stroke. 1993 Jul;24(7):987-93
pubmed: 8322400
Neurosurgery. 1977 Jul-Aug;1(1):60-1
pubmed: 615954
Neurosurgery. 2008 Dec;63(6):1125-9; discussion 1129
pubmed: 19008766
Stroke. 1998 Sep;29(9):1799-801
pubmed: 9731597
Int J Surg. 2013;11(7):544-8
pubmed: 23707986
J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Dec;34:252-258
pubmed: 27742369
Stroke. 1999 Jan;30(1):188
pubmed: 9880412
J Neurosurg. 2015 Nov;123(5):1209-15
pubmed: 25794342
Stroke. 2005 May;36(5):998-1000
pubmed: 15817899
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Apr;162(4):763-776
pubmed: 32025806
World Neurosurg. 2020 Jul;139:622-623
pubmed: 32518056
J Neuroinflammation. 2017 May 30;14(1):108
pubmed: 28558815
Neurosurgery. 2019 Dec 1;85(6):801-807
pubmed: 30418606
Neurosurgery. 2006 Mar;58(3 Suppl):S7-15; discussion Si-iv
pubmed: 16710967
Stroke. 1983 Jul-Aug;14(4):493-500
pubmed: 6606870
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2015 Jul-Aug;143(7-8):386-90
pubmed: 26506746
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2005 Apr;107(3):223-9
pubmed: 15823679
World Neurosurg. 2021 Apr;148:e58-e65
pubmed: 33359736