The influence of computer-aided polyp detection systems on reaction time for polyp detection and eye gaze.
Journal
Endoscopy
ISSN: 1438-8812
Titre abrégé: Endoscopy
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0215166
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
15
2
2022
medline:
28
9
2022
entrez:
14
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Multiple computer-aided systems for polyp detection (CADe) have been introduced into clinical practice, with an unclear effect on examiner behavior. This study aimed to measure the influence of a CADe system on reaction time, mucosa misinterpretation, and changes in visual gaze pattern. Participants with variable levels of colonoscopy experience viewed video sequences (n = 29) while eye movement was tracked. Using a crossover design, videos were presented in two assessments, with and without CADe support. Reaction time for polyp detection and eye-tracking metrics were evaluated. 21 participants performed 1218 experiments. CADe was significantly faster in detecting polyps compared with participants (median 1.16 seconds [99 %CI 0.40-3.43] vs. 2.97 seconds [99 %CI 2.53-3.77], respectively). However, the reaction time of participants when using CADe (median 2.90 seconds [99 %CI 2.55-3.38]) was similar to that without CADe. CADe increased misinterpretation of normal mucosa and reduced the eye travel distance. Results confirm that CADe systems detect polyps faster than humans. However, use of CADe did not improve human reaction times. It increased misinterpretation of normal mucosa and decreased the eye travel distance. Possible consequences of these findings might be prolonged examination time and deskilling.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Multiple computer-aided systems for polyp detection (CADe) have been introduced into clinical practice, with an unclear effect on examiner behavior. This study aimed to measure the influence of a CADe system on reaction time, mucosa misinterpretation, and changes in visual gaze pattern.
METHODS
Participants with variable levels of colonoscopy experience viewed video sequences (n = 29) while eye movement was tracked. Using a crossover design, videos were presented in two assessments, with and without CADe support. Reaction time for polyp detection and eye-tracking metrics were evaluated.
RESULTS
21 participants performed 1218 experiments. CADe was significantly faster in detecting polyps compared with participants (median 1.16 seconds [99 %CI 0.40-3.43] vs. 2.97 seconds [99 %CI 2.53-3.77], respectively). However, the reaction time of participants when using CADe (median 2.90 seconds [99 %CI 2.55-3.38]) was similar to that without CADe. CADe increased misinterpretation of normal mucosa and reduced the eye travel distance.
CONCLUSIONS
Results confirm that CADe systems detect polyps faster than humans. However, use of CADe did not improve human reaction times. It increased misinterpretation of normal mucosa and decreased the eye travel distance. Possible consequences of these findings might be prolonged examination time and deskilling.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35158384
doi: 10.1055/a-1770-7353
pmc: PMC9500006
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1009-1014Informations de copyright
The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Références
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Jan;93(1):77-85.e6
pubmed: 32598963
Gastroenterology. 2020 Aug;159(2):512-520.e7
pubmed: 32371116
Endoscopy. 2022 Feb;54(2):180-184
pubmed: 33494106
Endoscopy. 2018 Jul;50(7):701-707
pubmed: 29415286
N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 14;355(24):2533-41
pubmed: 17167136
N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 3;370(14):1298-306
pubmed: 24693890
Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jun;106(6):1070-4
pubmed: 21326224
Gut. 2020 May;69(5):799-800
pubmed: 31615835
Endoscopy. 2010 Aug;42(8):652-5
pubmed: 20539975
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Dec 1;33(1S Suppl 1):e662-e669
pubmed: 34034272
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Oct;92(4):900-904.e4
pubmed: 32561410
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Oct;6(10):793-802
pubmed: 34363763
Endoscopy. 2019 Dec;51(12):1155-1179
pubmed: 31711241
Gastroenterology. 2020 Jan;158(2):404-417
pubmed: 31759062