Inebilizumab for treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in patients with prior rituximab use from the N-MOmentum Study.


Journal

Multiple sclerosis and related disorders
ISSN: 2211-0356
Titre abrégé: Mult Scler Relat Disord
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101580247

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Historique:
received: 31 03 2021
revised: 24 09 2021
accepted: 24 10 2021
entrez: 15 2 2022
pubmed: 16 2 2022
medline: 17 2 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The B-cell-depleting agent rituximab (anti-CD20) was historically used to prevent attacks in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Inebilizumab, which targets and depletes CD19-expressing B cells, plasmablasts, and some plasma cells, received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of NMOSD based on results from the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 N-MOmentum trial. Because of their closely related mechanisms of action, consideration as to whether inebilizumab may be a suitable treatment option for patients with prior rituximab experience is important. This post hoc analysis of data from N-MOmentum assessed inebilizumab efficacy and tolerability in participants previously treated with rituximab. Adjudicated attacks, secondary efficacy outcomes, and treatment-emergent adverse events were assessed by prior rituximab use during a 6-month randomized control period and open-label period. Seventeen participants in N-MOmentum had prior rituximab use, of whom 13 were randomly assigned to the inebilizumab treatment group. Seven of these participants had breakthrough attacks prior to enrollment (annualized attack rate, 0.78 attacks/person-year) despite rituximab use. While they were receiving inebilizumab in the randomized control period, 1 of 13 participants with prior rituximab use had an attack (hazard ratio vs all placebo, 0.16; 95% confidence interval: 0.02 1.20; p = 0.07). Two additional participants with prior rituximab use experienced attacks on inebilizumab during the open-label period, with an overall annualized attack rate of 0.08 (95% confidence interval: 0.02 0.34) attacks/person-year. This annualized attack rate was similar to that of participants without prior rituximab use (0.10 [95% confidence interval: 0.07 0.15]). None of the 7 participants who experienced attacks while taking rituximab experienced an attack while receiving inebilizumab. Two (12%) participants with prior rituximab use experienced serious treatment-emergent adverse events related to inebilizumab, with serious or grade ≥3 infections occurring in 3 (18%) participants each. No deaths or opportunistic infections were reported in this cohort. These findings support the efficacy of inebilizumab in participants with NMOSD who had previously been treated with rituximab. Infections occurred in nearly all study participants with prior rituximab exposure, highlighting a need for clinical vigilance in such individuals. Further studies are necessary to determine potential safety concerns of inebilizumab, including risk of infection, in rituximab-experienced patients. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02200770.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The B-cell-depleting agent rituximab (anti-CD20) was historically used to prevent attacks in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Inebilizumab, which targets and depletes CD19-expressing B cells, plasmablasts, and some plasma cells, received approval from the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of NMOSD based on results from the randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 N-MOmentum trial. Because of their closely related mechanisms of action, consideration as to whether inebilizumab may be a suitable treatment option for patients with prior rituximab experience is important. This post hoc analysis of data from N-MOmentum assessed inebilizumab efficacy and tolerability in participants previously treated with rituximab.
METHODS METHODS
Adjudicated attacks, secondary efficacy outcomes, and treatment-emergent adverse events were assessed by prior rituximab use during a 6-month randomized control period and open-label period.
RESULTS RESULTS
Seventeen participants in N-MOmentum had prior rituximab use, of whom 13 were randomly assigned to the inebilizumab treatment group. Seven of these participants had breakthrough attacks prior to enrollment (annualized attack rate, 0.78 attacks/person-year) despite rituximab use. While they were receiving inebilizumab in the randomized control period, 1 of 13 participants with prior rituximab use had an attack (hazard ratio vs all placebo, 0.16; 95% confidence interval: 0.02 1.20; p = 0.07). Two additional participants with prior rituximab use experienced attacks on inebilizumab during the open-label period, with an overall annualized attack rate of 0.08 (95% confidence interval: 0.02 0.34) attacks/person-year. This annualized attack rate was similar to that of participants without prior rituximab use (0.10 [95% confidence interval: 0.07 0.15]). None of the 7 participants who experienced attacks while taking rituximab experienced an attack while receiving inebilizumab. Two (12%) participants with prior rituximab use experienced serious treatment-emergent adverse events related to inebilizumab, with serious or grade ≥3 infections occurring in 3 (18%) participants each. No deaths or opportunistic infections were reported in this cohort.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
These findings support the efficacy of inebilizumab in participants with NMOSD who had previously been treated with rituximab. Infections occurred in nearly all study participants with prior rituximab exposure, highlighting a need for clinical vigilance in such individuals. Further studies are necessary to determine potential safety concerns of inebilizumab, including risk of infection, in rituximab-experienced patients. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02200770.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35158461
pii: S2211-0348(21)00619-2
doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103352
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized 0
Antigens, CD20 0
Aquaporin 4 0
Rituximab 4F4X42SYQ6
inebilizumab 74T7185BMM

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02200770']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

103352

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Auteurs

Eoin P Flanagan (EP)

Departments of Neurology and Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Michael Levy (M)

Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Eliezer Katz (E)

Horizon Therapeutics (formerly Viela Bio) plc, Deerfield, IL, USA.

Daniel Cimbora (D)

Horizon Therapeutics (formerly Viela Bio) plc, Deerfield, IL, USA.

Jorn Drappa (J)

Horizon Therapeutics (formerly Viela Bio) plc, Deerfield, IL, USA.

Maureen A Mealy (MA)

Horizon Therapeutics (formerly Viela Bio) plc, Deerfield, IL, USA.

Dewei She (D)

Horizon Therapeutics (formerly Viela Bio) plc, Deerfield, IL, USA.

Bruce A C Cree (BAC)

Department of Neurology, UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, Box 3206, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH