Navel Healing and Calf Fitness for Transport.
calf
health
law
navel healing
transport
umbilicus
welfare
Journal
Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Feb 2022
01 Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
21
12
2021
revised:
25
01
2022
accepted:
30
01
2022
entrez:
15
2
2022
pubmed:
16
2
2022
medline:
16
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Dairy male calves are at risk of welfare compromise as they are usually transported at a very young age. The European Union has set a "completely healed navel" requirement for calf transport; moreover, a minimum age is established for longer journeys. However, this requirement has proven to be prone to misinterpretation. This study aimed to clarify what is meant by "navel healing" and to provide strong elements for reaching a consensus. The navels of 299 dairy calves (55 males, 244 females) aged 0-90 days were examined and scored 1 to 5 according to their healing status. Based on our results, a completely dry and shriveled navel (score 3) would imply a 25.5-38.0% risk of transporting too young calves. Alternatively, the presence of a scab covering the umbilical wound (score 4) would entail a 4.3% risk of transporting calves less than 10 days old and could be considered good practice for transporting calves (except for journeys exceeding 8 h). Conversely, complete navel healing (score 5) guarantees that calves that are too young are not transported; therefore, it should be considered best practice for transporting calves in general and the minimum requirement for transporting calves for journeys exceeding 8 h.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35158680
pii: ani12030358
doi: 10.3390/ani12030358
pmc: PMC8833597
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Animals (Basel). 2018 Sep 17;8(9):
pubmed: 30227665
Eur Surg Res. 2012;49(1):35-43
pubmed: 22797712
J Dairy Sci. 2000 Apr;83(4):843-54
pubmed: 10791802
J Anim Sci. 2017 Sep;95(9):3863-3872
pubmed: 28992033
Prev Vet Med. 2003 May 15;58(3-4):179-97
pubmed: 12706057
Aust Vet J. 2005 Jan-Feb;83(1-2):82-4
pubmed: 15971826
Aust Vet J. 2005 Jun;83(6):371-3
pubmed: 15986918
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Jul;102(7):6454-6465
pubmed: 31030911
Vet Rec. 1995 Oct 14;137(16):406-7
pubmed: 8545939
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Jun;101(6):5444-5448
pubmed: 29573800
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Dec;103(12):11628-11635
pubmed: 33069400
Res Vet Sci. 2012 Feb;92(1):162-8
pubmed: 21094507
N Z Vet J. 2013 May;61(3):127-32
pubmed: 23181407
Animals (Basel). 2021 Feb 02;11(2):
pubmed: 33540923
J Vet Intern Med. 2000 Nov-Dec;14(6):569-77
pubmed: 11110376
Can Vet J. 2002 Jul;43(7):523-7
pubmed: 12125183
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Jan;103(1):858-863
pubmed: 31733867
J Anim Sci. 2012 Apr;90(4):1183-91
pubmed: 22100587
J Dairy Sci. 2019 May;102(5):4489-4497
pubmed: 30852014
Prev Vet Med. 1998 Feb 6;34(1):31-46
pubmed: 9541949
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Dec;101(12):11251-11255
pubmed: 30292555
Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Sep;32(7):1579-1586
pubmed: 28717890
N Z Vet J. 1993 Dec;41(4):166-70
pubmed: 16031723
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Mar;103(3):2567-2577
pubmed: 31864751
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Mar;101(3):2659-2668
pubmed: 29290439