Pathological Response in the Breast and Axillary Lymph Nodes after Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment in Patients with Initially Node-Positive Breast Cancer Correlates with Disease Free Survival: An Exploratory Analysis of the GeparOcto Trial.
axillary surgery
breast cancer
lymph node
neoadjuvant therapy
pathological complete response
prognosis
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Jan 2022
20 Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
01
12
2021
revised:
13
01
2022
accepted:
18
01
2022
entrez:
15
2
2022
pubmed:
16
2
2022
medline:
16
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The conversion of initially histologically confirmed axillary lymph node-positive (pN+) to ypN0 after neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAST) is an important prognostic factor in breast cancer (BC) patients and may influence surgical de-escalation strategies. We aimed to determine pCR rates in lymph nodes (pCR-LN), the breast (pCR-B), and both (tpCR) in women who present with pN+ BC, to assess predictors for response and the impact of pCR-LN, pCR-B, and tpCR on invasive disease-free survival (iDFS). Retrospective, exploratory analysis of 242 patients with pN+ at diagnosis from the multicentric, randomized GeparOcto trial. Of 242 patients with initially pN+ disease, 134 (55.4%) had a pCR-LN, and 109 (45.0%) a pCR-B. Of the 109 pCR-B patients, 9 (8.3%) patients had involved LN, and 100 (41.3%) patients had tpCR. Those with involved LN still had a bad prognosis. As expected, pCR-B and intrinsic subtypes (TNBC and HER2+) were identified as independent predictors of pCR-LN. pCR-LN (ypN0; hazard ratio 0.42; 95%, CI 0.23-0.75; In initially pN+ patients undergoing NAST, the conversion to ypN0 is of high prognostic value. Surgical axillary staging after NAST is still essential in these patients to offer tailored treatment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The conversion of initially histologically confirmed axillary lymph node-positive (pN+) to ypN0 after neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAST) is an important prognostic factor in breast cancer (BC) patients and may influence surgical de-escalation strategies. We aimed to determine pCR rates in lymph nodes (pCR-LN), the breast (pCR-B), and both (tpCR) in women who present with pN+ BC, to assess predictors for response and the impact of pCR-LN, pCR-B, and tpCR on invasive disease-free survival (iDFS).
METHODS
METHODS
Retrospective, exploratory analysis of 242 patients with pN+ at diagnosis from the multicentric, randomized GeparOcto trial.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of 242 patients with initially pN+ disease, 134 (55.4%) had a pCR-LN, and 109 (45.0%) a pCR-B. Of the 109 pCR-B patients, 9 (8.3%) patients had involved LN, and 100 (41.3%) patients had tpCR. Those with involved LN still had a bad prognosis. As expected, pCR-B and intrinsic subtypes (TNBC and HER2+) were identified as independent predictors of pCR-LN. pCR-LN (ypN0; hazard ratio 0.42; 95%, CI 0.23-0.75;
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In initially pN+ patients undergoing NAST, the conversion to ypN0 is of high prognostic value. Surgical axillary staging after NAST is still essential in these patients to offer tailored treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35158789
pii: cancers14030521
doi: 10.3390/cancers14030521
pmc: PMC8833390
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Amgen
ID : n.a.
Organisme : Roche
ID : n.a.
Organisme : TEVA
ID : n.a.
Organisme : Vifor
ID : n.a.
Références
JAMA. 2017 Sep 12;318(10):918-926
pubmed: 28898379
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 May;25(5):1304-1311
pubmed: 29368152
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 May;22(5):1441-6
pubmed: 25727556
Br J Surg. 2021 Apr 5;108(3):302-307
pubmed: 33793745
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019 Jan;39:42-48
pubmed: 31099648
Br J Surg. 2018 Nov;105(12):1541-1552
pubmed: 30311642
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):609-18
pubmed: 23683750
Eur J Cancer. 2020 May;130:92-101
pubmed: 32179450
Semin Oncol. 2020 Oct;47(5):249-258
pubmed: 32928586
Breast. 2017 Feb;31:202-207
pubmed: 27889596
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 20;33(30):3386-93
pubmed: 25646192
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2017 Oct;45(10):535-544
pubmed: 28939364
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan;19(1):27-39
pubmed: 29242041
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Dec 1;7(12):1851-1855
pubmed: 34617979
JAMA Surg. 2018 Dec 1;153(12):1120-1126
pubmed: 30193375
Breast Care (Basel). 2018 Dec;13(6):440-446
pubmed: 30800039
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019 Mar;45(3):702-709
pubmed: 30567630
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2017 Feb;77(2):149-157
pubmed: 28331237
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Aug;47(8):1920-1927
pubmed: 33972144
JAMA Surg. 2017 Jul 1;152(7):665-670
pubmed: 28423171
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 29;13(7):
pubmed: 33805367
JAMA Surg. 2021 Jun 1;156(6):e210891
pubmed: 33881478
Ann Surg. 2020 Nov 04;:
pubmed: 33156057
Ann Surg. 2020 Mar;271(3):574-580
pubmed: 30557203
Ann Surg. 2019 Mar;269(3):432-442
pubmed: 30312200
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Jan;106:181-192
pubmed: 30528802
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec;26(13):4238-4243
pubmed: 31583546
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Mar;210(3):669-676
pubmed: 29381381
JAMA. 2013 Oct 9;310(14):1455-61
pubmed: 24101169
Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Oct;26(11):3502-3509
pubmed: 31228134
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2021 Nov 29;13:17588359211059587
pubmed: 34868353