Ten-Year Stability of Clinical Attachment after Regenerative Treatment of Infrabony Defects and Controls.
attachment loss
enamel matrix derivatives
guided tissue regeneration
periodontitis
surgical procedures
tooth loss
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Jan 2022
21 Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
20
12
2021
revised:
18
01
2022
accepted:
19
01
2022
entrez:
15
2
2022
pubmed:
16
2
2022
medline:
16
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A similar long-term stable clinical attachment level (CAL) of infrabony defects (IBDs) after regenerative treatment compared to control teeth would indicate a high level of stability resulting from the regenerative approach. Patients with a regeneratively treated IBD were screened 120 ± 12 months postoperatively for eligibility for study participation, and were included if complete baseline and 12-month examinations (plaque (PlI), periodontal probing depth (PPD), CAL) were available and a respective control tooth could be identified. Re-examination included clinical examination (PPD, CAL, PlI/GI, bleeding on probing, plaque control record, gingival bleeding index). A total of 27 patients (16 females; age (median; lower/upper quartile): 57.0; 44.0/60.0 years; 6 smokers) contributed 27 IBDs (test), for each of which a control tooth was identified. Five test teeth (18.5%) were lost between 12 and 120 months. The remaining 22 test teeth revealed a significant CAL gain after 1 (2.5 mm; 1.0/4.0 mm, Regenerative treatment of IBDs exhibited stability comparable to non-surgically treated, periodontally reduced sites over a 10-year period.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
A similar long-term stable clinical attachment level (CAL) of infrabony defects (IBDs) after regenerative treatment compared to control teeth would indicate a high level of stability resulting from the regenerative approach.
METHODS
METHODS
Patients with a regeneratively treated IBD were screened 120 ± 12 months postoperatively for eligibility for study participation, and were included if complete baseline and 12-month examinations (plaque (PlI), periodontal probing depth (PPD), CAL) were available and a respective control tooth could be identified. Re-examination included clinical examination (PPD, CAL, PlI/GI, bleeding on probing, plaque control record, gingival bleeding index).
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 27 patients (16 females; age (median; lower/upper quartile): 57.0; 44.0/60.0 years; 6 smokers) contributed 27 IBDs (test), for each of which a control tooth was identified. Five test teeth (18.5%) were lost between 12 and 120 months. The remaining 22 test teeth revealed a significant CAL gain after 1 (2.5 mm; 1.0/4.0 mm,
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Regenerative treatment of IBDs exhibited stability comparable to non-surgically treated, periodontally reduced sites over a 10-year period.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35159996
pii: jcm11030543
doi: 10.3390/jcm11030543
pmc: PMC8836894
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Moessner Stiftung
ID : n/a
Références
J Clin Periodontol. 1994 Oct;21(9):606-10
pubmed: 7806677
J Periodontol. 2013 Jun;84(6):749-57
pubmed: 22873657
J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Apr;37(4):366-73
pubmed: 20447260
J Periodontol. 1993 Apr;64(4):261-8
pubmed: 8483088
Periodontol 2000. 2015 Jun;68(1):282-307
pubmed: 25867990
J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Apr;40(4):327-33
pubmed: 23432024
Ann Periodontol. 1999 Dec;4(1):1-6
pubmed: 10863370
Ann Periodontol. 2003 Dec;8(1):266-302
pubmed: 14971257
J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Jul;47 Suppl 22:4-60
pubmed: 32383274
J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Nov;36(11):976-83
pubmed: 19807821
J Periodontol. 2008 Aug;79(8):1491-9
pubmed: 18673000
J Clin Periodontol. 1996 Feb;23(2):106-11
pubmed: 8849846
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1999 Dec;19(6):589-99
pubmed: 10815597
J Periodontol. 1967 Nov-Dec;38(6):Suppl:610-6
pubmed: 5237684
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;(2):CD001724
pubmed: 16625546
J Periodontal Res. 2020 Dec;55(6):946-958
pubmed: 33145760
J Clin Periodontol. 1998 Dec;25(12):981-7
pubmed: 9869347
J Periodontol. 2014 May;85(5):669-75
pubmed: 24059744
J Clin Periodontol. 1982 Jul;9(4):290-6
pubmed: 6964676
J Periodontol. 1993 Apr;64(4):254-60
pubmed: 8483087
Ann Periodontol. 1997 Mar;2(1):229-39
pubmed: 9151557
J Periodontol. 1995 Sep;66(9):797-803
pubmed: 7500246
J Clin Periodontol. 2012 May;39(5):448-56
pubmed: 22385260
J Periodontol. 2000 Dec;71(12):1928
pubmed: 11156050
J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Feb;35(2):165-74
pubmed: 18199150
J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Apr;36(4):349-56
pubmed: 19426182
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2003;1(1):7-16
pubmed: 15643744
J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Jul;47(7):863-874
pubmed: 32390170
J Clin Periodontol. 2017 Jan;44(1):58-66
pubmed: 27736011
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 07;(4):CD003875
pubmed: 19821315
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 May;46(5):552-563
pubmed: 30980561
J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Jul;47 Suppl 22:320-351
pubmed: 31860134
J Clin Periodontol. 2008 Sep;35(9):817-24
pubmed: 18647201
J Clin Periodontol. 2021 Mar;48(3):410-430
pubmed: 33289191
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S149-S161
pubmed: 29926495
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1991;101(10):1320-6
pubmed: 1947975
Int Dent J. 1975 Dec;25(4):229-35
pubmed: 1058834
J Periodontol. 2017 Jun;88(6):536-542
pubmed: 28398116
J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Jun;47(6):768-776
pubmed: 32249446
J Periodontol. 1995 Apr;66(4):261-6
pubmed: 7782979
J Clin Periodontol. 1995 Mar;22(3):229-34
pubmed: 7790529
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jun;46(6):650-658
pubmed: 30972774
J Periodontol. 1972 Jan;43(1):38
pubmed: 4500182