Fracture Strength and Failure Modes of Endodontically Treated Premolars Restored with Compact and Hollow Composite Posts Subjected to Cyclic Fatigue.
bending
endodontic post
fatigue
fiber reinforced composite
fracture strength
particulate composite
Journal
Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Feb 2022
01 Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
12
01
2022
revised:
22
01
2022
accepted:
29
01
2022
entrez:
15
2
2022
pubmed:
16
2
2022
medline:
16
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Physical and mechanical properties of continuous carbon or glass fiber reinforced endodontic posts are relevant to increase the retention and resistance of the tooth-restoration system. Hollow posts have been recently designed for delivering the luting cement through the post hole, thus enhancing the post-dentin interface by reducing the risk of air bubbles formation. Methods: Three type of endodontic posts, a carbon fiber hollow post, a glass fiber hollow post and a compact glass fiber post were investigated. Mechanical properties of these posts were assessed through bending tests. Teeth were subjected to fatigue cycling and the strength of restored teeth was detected through static tests. Failure modes were investigated through optical and scanning electron microscopy. Results show that composite posts increase the mechanical stability by more than 100% compared to premolars restored with particulate composite. Carbon fiber posts retain the highest strength (1467 N ± 304 N) among the investigated post and core restoration, but an unfavorable type of fracture has been observed, preventing the tooth re-treatment. Instead, more compliant posts (i.e., glass fiber reinforced composite, providing a strength of 1336 N ± 221 N), show a favorable mode of fracture that allows the re-treatment of teeth in the case that failure occurs. Glass fiber hollow posts show a good trade-off between strength and a favorable type of fracture.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35161083
pii: ma15031141
doi: 10.3390/ma15031141
pmc: PMC8840014
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : SORRISO: Sviluppo di nanotecnologie orientate alla rigenerazione e ricostruzione tissutale, implantologia e sensoristica in odontoiatria/oculistica
ID : PON 03 PE_00110_1/ptd1_000410
Références
Biomaterials. 2005 Jan;26(3):257-70
pubmed: 15262468
Am J Dent. 2015 Oct;28(5):251-4
pubmed: 26714341
Int Endod J. 2006 Dec;39(12):921-30
pubmed: 17180780
Odontology. 2020 Oct;108(4):588-595
pubmed: 31950378
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018 Nov 1;92:862-867
pubmed: 30184815
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Jan 1;19(1):117-122
pubmed: 29358547
Materials (Basel). 2018 May 07;11(5):
pubmed: 29735896
J Endod. 2015 Mar;41(3):309-16
pubmed: 25459568
J Dent. 2014 May;42(5):582-7
pubmed: 24530920
J Endod. 2006 Aug;32(8):752-5
pubmed: 16861075
Am J Dent. 2009 Jun;22(3):147-50
pubmed: 19650594
J Appl Oral Sci. 2006 Aug;14(4):297-303
pubmed: 19089280
Dent J (Basel). 2019 Aug 01;7(3):
pubmed: 31374874
Materials (Basel). 2018 Mar 27;11(4):
pubmed: 29584683
Dent Mater. 2010 Aug;26(8):730-6
pubmed: 20413150
J Conserv Dent. 2010 Jul;13(3):124-8
pubmed: 21116385
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Oct 1;20(10):1195-1199
pubmed: 31883256
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2000 Apr;11(4):201-6
pubmed: 15348032
J Adhes Dent. 1999 Summer;1(2):153-8
pubmed: 11725680
Oper Dent. 2019 Jan/Feb;44(1):E1-E11
pubmed: 30715998
Materials (Basel). 2019 Jun 20;12(12):
pubmed: 31226763
Indian J Dent Res. 2014 Jan-Feb;25(1):58-63
pubmed: 24748301
J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Feb;97(2):93-8
pubmed: 17341377
J Endod. 2017 Jun;43(6):995-1000
pubmed: 28416305
J Adhes Dent. 2007 Feb;9(1):49-56
pubmed: 17432401
Oper Dent. 2003 Sep-Oct;28(5):515-21
pubmed: 14531596
Materials (Basel). 2020 Dec 11;13(24):
pubmed: 33322480