Can Post-Exercise Hemodynamic Response Be Influenced by Different Recovery Methods in Paraplegic Sportsmen?
blood pressure
cryotherapy
dry needling
resistance training
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 02 2022
04 02 2022
Historique:
received:
08
12
2021
revised:
25
01
2022
accepted:
26
01
2022
entrez:
15
2
2022
pubmed:
16
2
2022
medline:
1
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Post-exercise hypotension is of great clinical relevance and also in sports training settings, as recovery speed is important. The aim of this study was to compare the influence of different recovery methods on post-exercise hemodynamic response. Twelve male paraplegic sportsmen (25.40 ± 3.30 years) performed a strength training (ST) session using the bench press exercise. After the ST, three recovery methods were randomly performed over a 15-min period: passive recovery (PR), cold-water (CW) and dry needle (DN). Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and myocardial oxygen were measured before and post ST, as well as post the recovery method. Results: Dry needling induced lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) immediately after the treatment when compared with the other recovery methods, but the contrary was observed at 50 and 60-min post recovery, where records with DN exhibit higher mean values (η
Identifiants
pubmed: 35162794
pii: ijerph19031772
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031772
pmc: PMC8834798
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Chin J Integr Med. 2017 Feb;23(2):83-90
pubmed: 28265852
Med Acupunct. 2013 Apr;25(2):101-113
pubmed: 24761168
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014 Aug;24(4):656-66
pubmed: 23458430
J Pain Res. 2019 Jun 18;12:1899-1911
pubmed: 31354339
Int J Hypertens. 2019 Mar 7;2019:8676490
pubmed: 30984420
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Jun;31(6):1569-1576
pubmed: 28538307
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018 Mar;28(3):1252-1262
pubmed: 29130570
Exerc Immunol Rev. 2012;18:42-97
pubmed: 22876722
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2019 Nov;59(11):1925-1933
pubmed: 31219254
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 26;4:863
pubmed: 24324449
Sports Med. 2017 Mar;47(3):479-501
pubmed: 27328853
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Apr 15;30(8):944-63
pubmed: 15834340
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Apr 01;56(4):
pubmed: 32244628
Sports Med. 2016 Aug;46(8):1095-109
pubmed: 26888646
J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 Feb 01;2(1):e004473
pubmed: 23525435
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2016 Jan;36(1):53-9
pubmed: 25257752
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Nov;23(16):1700-1714
pubmed: 27512052
Complement Ther Med. 2017 Apr;31:20-26
pubmed: 28434467
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 13;18(10):
pubmed: 34067984
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Jun;49(6):1252-1260
pubmed: 28141620
Hypertension. 1993 Nov;22(5):653-64
pubmed: 8225525
J Strength Cond Res. 2014 Jun;28(6):1706-13
pubmed: 24276299
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;(2):CD008262
pubmed: 22336838
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1985 Mar;58(3):785-90
pubmed: 3980383
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2016 May;56(5):616-23
pubmed: 27285350
Hypertens Res. 2013 Jun;36(6):534-9
pubmed: 23344132
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2018 Jan;38(1):46-55
pubmed: 27464622
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9
pubmed: 19565683