An Economic Analysis of Mumps Vaccination in Fiji: Static Model Simulation of Routine Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) Vaccination Instead of Current Measles-Rubella (MR) Vaccination.
Fiji
cost benefit analysis
mumps vaccination
static model
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 02 2022
07 02 2022
Historique:
received:
27
12
2021
revised:
31
01
2022
accepted:
04
02
2022
entrez:
15
2
2022
pubmed:
16
2
2022
medline:
1
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Mumps remains endemic in Fiji, with 7802 cases reported between 2016 and 2018. The introduction of mumps vaccination has been discouraged due to perceptions of mumps as a self-limited disease and the perceived high cost of mumps vaccines. We estimated the benefits and costs of introducing a mumps vaccination program in Fiji. First, we estimated the burden of mumps and mumps-related complications in Fiji based on the reported cases in the Fiji National Notifiable Disease Surveillance System between 2016 and 2018. We then developed a static simulation model with stable mumps herd immunity after routine measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination. Finally, we compared the estimated economic burden of mumps with current MR vaccination and the assumptive burden of the stable-state simulation model after routine MMR vaccination. The benefit-cost ratios (BCRs) were 2.65 from the taxpayer view and 3.00 from the societal view. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that the 1st and 99th percentiles of BCRs were 1.4 and 5.2 from the taxpayer's perspective and 1.5 and 6.1 from the societal perspective. From both the taxpayer and societal perspectives, the probability of BCRs greater than 1.0 was 100%. A routine MMR program has value for money from both the taxpayer and societal perspectives. MMR vaccination should be urgently introduced in Fiji.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35162883
pii: ijerph19031861
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031861
pmc: PMC8835634
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Viral
0
Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Epidemiol Infect. 2000 Dec;125(3):635-50
pubmed: 11218214
Vaccine. 2014 Jul 16;32(33):4189-97
pubmed: 24923640
Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Jun 15;50(12):1619-28
pubmed: 20455692
Vaccine. 2017 Dec 4;35(48 Pt B):6751-6758
pubmed: 29066189
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2016 Jul;35(7):799-801
pubmed: 27097351
Acta Otolaryngol. 2017;137(sup565):S44-S47
pubmed: 28338374
Isr J Med Sci. 1990 Feb;26(2):74-80
pubmed: 2108102
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2014;10(8):2446-9
pubmed: 25424953
Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 2017 Jul;6(2):120-127
pubmed: 28775976
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2020 Mar/Apr;26(2):109-115
pubmed: 30789597
Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Aug 15;45(4):459-66
pubmed: 17638194
Heliyon. 2020 May 20;6(5):e04016
pubmed: 32462097
BMJ. 2005 May 14;330(7500):1132-5
pubmed: 15891229
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009 Mar;28(3):173-5
pubmed: 19209100
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 05;17(5):
pubmed: 32150969
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1989 Nov;8(11):751-5
pubmed: 2594449
Bull World Health Organ. 1999;77(1):3-14
pubmed: 10063655
Am J Dis Child. 1982 Apr;136(4):362-4
pubmed: 6803581
J Infect Dis. 2004 May 1;189 Suppl 1:S131-45
pubmed: 15106102
Acta Virol. 2013;57(2):91-6
pubmed: 23600866