[Finite element analyses of retention of removable partial denture circumferential clasps manufactured by selective laser melting].
Circumferential clasp
Design parameters
Finite element analyses
Retention, dental prosthesis
Selective laser melting
Journal
Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences
ISSN: 1671-167X
Titre abrégé: Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101125284
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Feb 2022
18 Feb 2022
Historique:
entrez:
15
2
2022
pubmed:
16
2
2022
medline:
17
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To compare the retentions of different designs of cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr), pure titanium (CP Ti), and titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) removable partial denture (RPD) circumferential clasps manufactured by selective laser melting (SLM) and to analyze the stress distribution of these clasps during the removal from abutment teeth. Clasps with clasp arm size A (1.9 mm width/1.1 mm thickness at the body and 0.8-taper) or B (1.2 times A) and 0.25 mm or 0.50 mm undercut engagement were modeled on a prepared first premolar die, named as designs A1, A2, A3, and A4, respectively. The density and elastic modulus of SLM-built Co-Cr, CP Ti, and Ti-6Al-4V were measured and given to different groups of clasps. The density, elastic modulus, and Poisson ' s ratio of enamel were given to the die. The control group was the cast Co-Cr clasp with design A1, to which the density and elastic modulus of cast Co-Cr alloy were given. The Poisson's ratio of all metals was 0.33. The initial 5 N dislodging force was applied, and the maximum displacement of the clasp along the insertion path was computed. The load was reapplied with an increment of 5 N than in the last simulation until the clasp was completely dislodged. The retentive force range of different groups of clasps was obtained. The retentive forces of the SLM-built Co-Cr, CP Ti, and Ti-6Al-4V clasps with equivalent computed retentive force range to the control group were validated through the insertion/removal experiment. The von Mises stress distributions of these three groups of SLM-built clasps under 15 N loads were analyzed. SLM-built Co-Cr, CP Ti, and Ti-6Al-4V clasps with designs B1 or B2, and Co-Cr clasps with design A2 had higher retentive forces than those of the control group. SLM-built CP Ti and Ti-6Al-4V clasps with design A1 had lower retentive forces than those of the control group. SLM-built Co-Cr clasp with design A1 and SLM-built CP Ti and Ti-6Al-4V clasps with design A2 had equivalent retentive forces to those of the control group. The insertion/removal experiment showed that the measured retentive forces of these three groups of SLM-built clasps were (21.57±5.41) N, (19.75±4.47) N, and (19.32±2.04) N, respectively. No statistically significant measured retentive force difference was found among these three groups of SLM-built clasps ( SLM-built Co-Cr circumferential clasps had higher retention than CP Ti and Ti-6Al-4V ones with the same clasp arm size and undercut engagement. The retention of SLM-built circumferential clasps could be adjusted by changing the undercut engagement and clasp arm size. If SLM-built circumferential clasps are used in clinical practice, the Ti-6Al-4V clasp with clasp arm size A and 0.50 mm undercut engagement is recommended considering the long-term use of RPD in the patient's mouth.
Substances chimiques
Chromium Alloys
0
Titanium
D1JT611TNE
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
chi
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
105-112Références
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Jun;59:446-458
pubmed: 26974490
Eur J Dent. 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):352-356
pubmed: 28932146
Dent Mater. 2020 Feb;36(2):179-186
pubmed: 31791736
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Jun 9;52(6):351-354
pubmed: 28613056
J Dent Res. 2007 Sep;86(9):868-72
pubmed: 17720857
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jan;123(1):163-172
pubmed: 30982620
Dent Mater. 2018 Oct;34(10):1474-1482
pubmed: 29937332
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 27;9(1):13975
pubmed: 31562391
J Prosthodont Res. 2020 Apr;64(2):224-230
pubmed: 31466919
J Prosthodont Res. 2020 Oct;64(4):468-477
pubmed: 32063534
Dent Mater. 2007 Mar;23(3):317-24
pubmed: 16545447
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 May;10(5):ZC13-6
pubmed: 27437346
J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Jul;78(1):22-7
pubmed: 9237142
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jun;28(5):547-555
pubmed: 30407685
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Sep;122(3):316-324
pubmed: 30922559