There is No "Axillary Tail": Rethinking the Assumption of James Spence.


Journal

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
ISSN: 2169-7574
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101622231

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Historique:
received: 19 11 2021
accepted: 29 11 2021
entrez: 16 2 2022
pubmed: 17 2 2022
medline: 17 2 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Widely quoted, "the axillary tail of Spence" refers to a contiguous extension of adipose angling superolaterally from the primary breast into the axilla. Described anecdotally in 1871, the "tail of Spence" has been considered important to the fields of general surgery, oncology, plastic surgery, and anatomy ever since. Despite the ubiquitous presence of the concept in literature, clinical discussions, and educational settings, we argue against the very existence of Spence's "tail." While pinch-testing and topographically mapping 316 consecutive patients in preparation for breast and gynecomastia surgery, we found a consistent pattern of focal fat mounds without continuity between breast and axilla. The absence of an uninterrupted superolateral tail was reaffirmed while analyzing 20 research participants who were pinch-tested with calipers and topographically mapped, specifically to define fat pad anatomy. We documented that the axillary breast mound was always distinct from the primary breast and that all women and many men had an additional "lateral chest wall tail" that never angled toward the axilla. In most, rolling the shoulder girdle anteriorly created a visible groove between the axillary mound and the primary breast, with little or no pinchable fat beneath that crease. With all deference to Spence, we have established that the outer half of the chest is consistently defined by three focal adipose structures-an axillary mound, the primary breast mound, and a previously unnamed "lateral chest wall tail"-with no anatomic evidence of an "axillary tail" of fat extending superolaterally from breast to axilla.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35169519
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004086
pmc: PMC8830835
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e4086

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosure: The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.

Références

Virtual Mentor. 2010 May 01;12(5):412-7
pubmed: 23158396
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;25(10):3011-3018
pubmed: 29968027
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Oct 14;9(10):e3863
pubmed: 34667697
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Mar;131(3):507-509
pubmed: 23446564
Anticancer Res. 2012 Sep;32(9):4057-9
pubmed: 22993360
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2019;59:152-155
pubmed: 31163330
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Dec;146(6):836e-838e
pubmed: 33235005
Trans Med Chir Soc Edinb. 1892;11:37-70
pubmed: 29584365
Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2016;75(4):413-438
pubmed: 27830870

Auteurs

David Teplica (D)

The 803 Foundation, Chicago, Ill.
Section of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.
The Kinsey Institute, Indiana University, Bloomington, Ind.

Emmett Cooney (E)

Section of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.
Biology Department, The Morrissey College of Arts and Sciences, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Mass.

Eileen Jeffers (E)

The 803 Foundation, Chicago, Ill.

Michael Sayers (M)

The 803 Foundation, Chicago, Ill.

Classifications MeSH