Pharmacokinetic equations versus Bayesian guided vancomycin monitoring: Pharmacokinetic model and model-informed precision dosing trial simulations.
Journal
Clinical and translational science
ISSN: 1752-8062
Titre abrégé: Clin Transl Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101474067
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
revised:
04
11
2021
received:
08
10
2021
accepted:
20
11
2021
pubmed:
17
2
2022
medline:
19
4
2022
entrez:
16
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The recently released revised vancomycin consensus guideline endorsed area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) guided monitoring. Means to AUC-guided monitoring include pharmacokinetic (PK) equations and Bayesian software programs, with the latter approach being preferable. We aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of these two methods when monitoring using troughs or peaks and troughs at varying single or mixed dosing intervals (DIs), and evaluate the significance of satisfying underlying assumptions of steady-state and model transferability. Methods included developing a vancomycin population PK model and conducting model-informed precision dosing clinical trial simulations. A one-compartment PK model with linear elimination, exponential between-subject variability, and mixed (additive and proportional) residual error model resulted in the best model fit. Conducted simulations demonstrated that Bayesian-guided AUC can, potentially, outperform that of equation-based AUC predictions depending on the quality of model diagnostics and met assumptions. Ideally, Bayesian-guided AUC predictive performance using a trough from the first DI was equivalent to that of PK equations using two measurements (peak and trough) from the fifth DI. Model transferability diagnostics can guide the selection of Bayesian priors but are not strong indicators of predictive performance. Mixed versus single fourth and/or fifth DI sampling seems indifferent. This study illustrated cases associated with the most reliable AUC predictions and showed that only proper Bayesian-guided monitoring is always faster and more reliable than equations-guided monitoring in pre-steady-state DIs in the absence of a loading dose. This supports rapid Bayesian monitoring using data as sparse and early as a trough at the first DI.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35170243
doi: 10.1111/cts.13210
pmc: PMC9010252
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Vancomycin
6Q205EH1VU
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
942-953Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
Références
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2018 Dec;7(12):785-787
pubmed: 30255663
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019 Oct;44(5):750-759
pubmed: 31228353
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Dec;86(12):2497-2506
pubmed: 32415710
Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2021 Jan 6;61:225-245
pubmed: 33035445
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jan 25;62(2):
pubmed: 29203493
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020 May 19;77(11):835-864
pubmed: 32191793
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Feb;61(2):164-76
pubmed: 16433871
Front Pharmacol. 2020 May 07;11:620
pubmed: 32457619
Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Apr;15(4):942-953
pubmed: 35170243
Science. 1997 Apr 4;276(5309):122-6
pubmed: 9082983
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Feb 1;75(2):434-437
pubmed: 31670812
Pharmacotherapy. 2015 Feb;35(2):127-39
pubmed: 25644478
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jan;109(1):175-183
pubmed: 32996120
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2005 Sep;79(3):241-57
pubmed: 16023764
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2013 Jun 26;2:e50
pubmed: 23836189
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Oct;25(10):1286.e1-1286.e7
pubmed: 30872102
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014 Nov 20;77:50-7
pubmed: 24910345
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2014 Dec 22;3:e153
pubmed: 25531560
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2009 Aug;34(4):473-83
pubmed: 19583681
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2019 May;8(4):418-425
pubmed: 30500115
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 May 18;72(10):e675-e681
pubmed: 32898221
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2019 Jun;58(6):767-780
pubmed: 30656565
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2012 Jan 1;51(1):1-13
pubmed: 22149255
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2019 Jun;44(3):361-370
pubmed: 30506225
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2019 Jun 3;76(12):889-894
pubmed: 31063582
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2020 Oct;47(5):431-446
pubmed: 32535847
J Pharm Pract. 2021 Apr 27;:8971900211012395
pubmed: 33902351
Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Jan 1;42 Suppl 1:S35-9
pubmed: 16323118
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020 Jun;59(6):671-698
pubmed: 32020531
Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Dec;38(12):1174-1183
pubmed: 30362592
CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2019 May 1;:
pubmed: 31044558
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Feb;56(2):56-63
pubmed: 29319495