Laminate veneer ceramics in aesthetic rehabilitation of teeth with fluorosis: a 10-year follow-up study.
Aesthetic rehabilitation
Fluorosis
Laminate veneer ceramics
Journal
BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 02 2022
17 02 2022
Historique:
received:
09
12
2021
accepted:
09
02
2022
entrez:
17
2
2022
pubmed:
18
2
2022
medline:
24
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Fluorosis is one of the color anomalies seen in teeth. White lines and blurred areas associated with mild fluorosis are barely noticeable; in its severe form, tooth enamel surface changes ranging from staining and pitting may be observed. The treatment of fluorosis not only provides aesthetic and functional correction but also helps to improve the patient's self-esteem. The present retrospective study evaluated the clinical quality, success rate, and estimated survival of porcelain laminate veneers in teeth with anterior fluorosis. Three hundred fifty-eight porcelain laminate veneers (254 in the anterior maxilla and 104 in the mandible) were "functional" restorations that covered the incisal edge and part of the palatal/lingual side of the tooth with a 1 mm high palatal bevel. Ceramic veneers were fabricated with lithium disilicate reinforced glass-ceramic material (IPS e.max Press, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). The modified United States Public Health Service criteria were used for clinical evaluation of the restorations. On the basis of these criteria, marginal adaptation, color match, marginal discoloration, surface roughness, restoration fracture, tooth fracture, restoration wear, antagonist tooth wear, caries and postoperative sensitivity were evaluated yearly. The survival rate in the current study was ≥ 0.997 for 10 years. The results of this clinical study should encourage clinicians to consider ceramic veneers over crown restorations when restoring the smile of patients with advanced fluorosis.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Fluorosis is one of the color anomalies seen in teeth. White lines and blurred areas associated with mild fluorosis are barely noticeable; in its severe form, tooth enamel surface changes ranging from staining and pitting may be observed. The treatment of fluorosis not only provides aesthetic and functional correction but also helps to improve the patient's self-esteem.
METHODS
The present retrospective study evaluated the clinical quality, success rate, and estimated survival of porcelain laminate veneers in teeth with anterior fluorosis. Three hundred fifty-eight porcelain laminate veneers (254 in the anterior maxilla and 104 in the mandible) were "functional" restorations that covered the incisal edge and part of the palatal/lingual side of the tooth with a 1 mm high palatal bevel. Ceramic veneers were fabricated with lithium disilicate reinforced glass-ceramic material (IPS e.max Press, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein). The modified United States Public Health Service criteria were used for clinical evaluation of the restorations.
RESULTS
On the basis of these criteria, marginal adaptation, color match, marginal discoloration, surface roughness, restoration fracture, tooth fracture, restoration wear, antagonist tooth wear, caries and postoperative sensitivity were evaluated yearly. The survival rate in the current study was ≥ 0.997 for 10 years.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this clinical study should encourage clinicians to consider ceramic veneers over crown restorations when restoring the smile of patients with advanced fluorosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35172796
doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02079-4
pii: 10.1186/s12903-022-02079-4
pmc: PMC8851797
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
42Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Int Dent J. 2001 Oct;51(5):325-33
pubmed: 11697585
J Dent. 2009 Jan;37(1):31-8
pubmed: 18538912
J Dent Res. 1996 Dec;75(12):1936-41
pubmed: 9033447
Periodontol 2000. 1996 Jun;11:18-28
pubmed: 9567953
J Dent Res. 2005 Sep;84(9):832-6
pubmed: 16109993
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005 Feb;25(1):9-17
pubmed: 15736774
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010 May 01;15(3):e531-7
pubmed: 20038893
Aust Dent J. 2007 Sep;52(3):243-8
pubmed: 17969294
J Dent. 2014 Aug;42(8):938-44
pubmed: 24486675
J Conserv Dent. 2010 Jan;13(1):47-53
pubmed: 20582220
Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2002;13(2):155-70
pubmed: 12097358
Int J Prosthodont. 2012 Jan-Feb;25(1):79-85
pubmed: 22259802
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2017 Jul-Sep;35(3):260-268
pubmed: 28762354
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999 Feb;27(1):41-7
pubmed: 10086925
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009 Feb 01;14(2):E103-7
pubmed: 19179949
Gen Dent. 2016 Nov-Dec;64(6):e10-e15
pubmed: 27814262
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2008 Spring;32(3):185-7
pubmed: 18524266
J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Mar;81(3):327-34
pubmed: 10050122
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2001;13(5):318-27
pubmed: 11699584
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Sep;120(3):323-326
pubmed: 29724552
Int J Prosthodont. 1999 Mar-Apr;12(2):111-21
pubmed: 10371912
J Dent (Shiraz). 2014 Mar;15(1):44-7
pubmed: 24738090
J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Oct 31;8(10):3108-3113
pubmed: 31742127
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1998 Jun;18(3):216-25
pubmed: 9728104
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1978 Nov;6(6):315-28
pubmed: 282114
J Oral Rehabil. 1999 Jun;26(6):521-8
pubmed: 10397185
Caries Res. 2004 May-Jun;38(3):268-76
pubmed: 15153700
Gen Dent. 2008 May;56(3):244-9
pubmed: 19288832
Case Rep Dent. 2018 Jun 6;2018:4063165
pubmed: 29977624
J Dent. 2005 Mar;33(3):177-86
pubmed: 15725518
Eur J Esthet Dent. 2012 Summer;7(2):130-7
pubmed: 22645728