Migrators within migrators: exploring transposable element dynamics in the monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus.
Butterfly
Danaus plexippus
Genome Evolution
Genomic Deletion
Lepidoptera
Repeat
TE Annotation
Transposon
Journal
Mobile DNA
ISSN: 1759-8753
Titre abrégé: Mob DNA
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101519891
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Feb 2022
16 Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
29
09
2021
accepted:
06
02
2022
entrez:
17
2
2022
pubmed:
18
2
2022
medline:
18
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) are an important model system in ecology and evolution. A high-quality chromosomal genome assembly is available for the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus), but it lacks an in-depth transposable element (TE) annotation, presenting an opportunity to explore monarch TE dynamics and the impact of TEs on shaping the monarch genome. We find 6.21% of the monarch genome is comprised of TEs, a reduction of 6.85% compared to the original TE annotation performed on the draft genome assembly. Monarch TE content is low compared to two closely related species with available genomes, Danaus chrysippus (33.97% TE) and Danaus melanippus (11.87% TE). The biggest TE contributions to genome size in the monarch are LINEs and Penelope-like elements, and three newly identified families, r2-hero_dPle (LINE), penelope-1_dPle (Penelope-like), and hase2-1_dPle (SINE), collectively contribute 34.92% of total TE content. We find evidence of recent TE activity, with two novel Tc1 families rapidly expanding over recent timescales (tc1-1_dPle, tc1-2_dPle). LINE fragments show signatures of genomic deletions indicating a high rate of TE turnover. We investigate associations between TEs and wing colouration and immune genes and identify a three-fold increase in TE content around immune genes compared to other host genes. We provide a detailed TE annotation and analysis for the monarch genome, revealing a considerably smaller TE contribution to genome content compared to two closely related Danaus species with available genome assemblies. We identify highly successful novel DNA TE families rapidly expanding over recent timescales, and ongoing signatures of both TE expansion and removal highlight the dynamic nature of repeat content in the monarch genome. Our findings also suggest that insect immune genes are promising candidates for future interrogation of TE-mediated host adaptation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) are an important model system in ecology and evolution. A high-quality chromosomal genome assembly is available for the monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus), but it lacks an in-depth transposable element (TE) annotation, presenting an opportunity to explore monarch TE dynamics and the impact of TEs on shaping the monarch genome.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We find 6.21% of the monarch genome is comprised of TEs, a reduction of 6.85% compared to the original TE annotation performed on the draft genome assembly. Monarch TE content is low compared to two closely related species with available genomes, Danaus chrysippus (33.97% TE) and Danaus melanippus (11.87% TE). The biggest TE contributions to genome size in the monarch are LINEs and Penelope-like elements, and three newly identified families, r2-hero_dPle (LINE), penelope-1_dPle (Penelope-like), and hase2-1_dPle (SINE), collectively contribute 34.92% of total TE content. We find evidence of recent TE activity, with two novel Tc1 families rapidly expanding over recent timescales (tc1-1_dPle, tc1-2_dPle). LINE fragments show signatures of genomic deletions indicating a high rate of TE turnover. We investigate associations between TEs and wing colouration and immune genes and identify a three-fold increase in TE content around immune genes compared to other host genes.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We provide a detailed TE annotation and analysis for the monarch genome, revealing a considerably smaller TE contribution to genome content compared to two closely related Danaus species with available genome assemblies. We identify highly successful novel DNA TE families rapidly expanding over recent timescales, and ongoing signatures of both TE expansion and removal highlight the dynamic nature of repeat content in the monarch genome. Our findings also suggest that insect immune genes are promising candidates for future interrogation of TE-mediated host adaptation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35172896
doi: 10.1186/s13100-022-00263-5
pii: 10.1186/s13100-022-00263-5
pmc: PMC8848866
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
5Subventions
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/M009122/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/N020146/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Genetics. 2005 Nov;171(3):1183-94
pubmed: 16157677
Nat Genet. 2005 Sep;37(9):997-1002
pubmed: 16056225
Bioinformatics. 2012 Dec 1;28(23):3150-2
pubmed: 23060610
Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Mar;15(3):95-99
pubmed: 10675923
Curr Biol. 2019 Dec 2;29(23):4071-4077.e3
pubmed: 31735674
Genome Biol Evol. 2018 Jan 1;10(1):304-318
pubmed: 29281015
Genome Res. 2002 Aug;12(8):1269-76
pubmed: 12176934
Plant Mol Biol. 2000 Jan;42(1):251-69
pubmed: 10688140
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D7-17
pubmed: 24259429
Genome Biol Evol. 2018 Nov 1;10(11):3038-3057
pubmed: 30252073
J Mol Evol. 1980 Dec;16(2):111-20
pubmed: 7463489
Genome Biol Evol. 2012;4(5):687-702
pubmed: 22534163
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 6;8(1):13332
pubmed: 30190506
Nature. 2006 Oct 5;443(7111):521-4
pubmed: 17024082
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D81-9
pubmed: 26612867
Nature. 2006 May 4;441(7089):87-90
pubmed: 16625209
Genome Biol. 2018 Nov 19;19(1):199
pubmed: 30454069
Nat Rev Genet. 2011 Aug 18;12(9):615-27
pubmed: 21850042
Nat Genet. 2007 Dec;39(12):1461-8
pubmed: 17987029
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2007;8:241-59
pubmed: 17506661
Genome Biol Evol. 2019 Aug 1;11(8):2162-2177
pubmed: 31214686
Elife. 2019 Jan 08;8:
pubmed: 30620335
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jan 7;94(1):196-201
pubmed: 8990185
Genome Res. 2018 Jun;28(6):824-835
pubmed: 29712752
Bioinformatics. 2017 Oct 1;33(19):3088-3090
pubmed: 28575171
Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Apr;30(4):772-80
pubmed: 23329690
Bioinformatics. 2014 Nov 15;30(22):3276-8
pubmed: 25095880
Genome Biol Evol. 2016 Jan 21;8(2):403-10
pubmed: 26802115
Nature. 2010 Apr 29;464(7293):1347-50
pubmed: 20428170
Biol Lett. 2021 Sep;17(9):20210342
pubmed: 34464541
Nature. 2016 Jun 01;534(7605):102-5
pubmed: 27251284
Nat Rev Genet. 2001 Apr;2(4):256-67
pubmed: 11283698
Mol Biol Evol. 2012 Dec;29(12):3685-702
pubmed: 22826456
DNA Res. 2012;19(1):11-21
pubmed: 22086996
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Jun 16;12(6):e1004956
pubmed: 27309962
Bioinformatics. 2013 Oct 1;29(19):2487-9
pubmed: 23842809
Mol Ecol. 2019 Mar;28(6):1537-1549
pubmed: 30003608
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;110(1-4):462-7
pubmed: 16093699
Biotechniques. 2005 Apr;38(4):561-5
pubmed: 15884674
Nat Rev Genet. 2017 May;18(5):292-308
pubmed: 28286338
Trends Genet. 2000 Jun;16(6):276-7
pubmed: 10827456
Bioinformatics. 2005 Jun;21 Suppl 1:i351-8
pubmed: 15961478
Heredity (Edinb). 2016 May;116(5):466-76
pubmed: 26860199
Nat Rev Genet. 2008 May;9(5):397-405
pubmed: 18368054
Genome Biol Evol. 2017 Oct 1;9(10):2491-2505
pubmed: 28981642
Bioessays. 2006 Sep;28(9):913-22
pubmed: 16937363
Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015 Nov;72(21):4063-76
pubmed: 26223268
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;110(1-4):510-21
pubmed: 16093704
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;110(1-4):25-34
pubmed: 16093655
Gene. 2016 Dec 5;594(1):151-159
pubmed: 27614292
Int Immunol. 2000 Jun;12(6):757-65
pubmed: 10837403
Mol Ecol. 2013 Mar;22(6):1503-17
pubmed: 23293987
Nat Rev Genet. 2012 Mar 06;13(4):233-45
pubmed: 22392219
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2016 Apr;37:90-100
pubmed: 26855260
Curr Biol. 2018 Mar 5;28(5):770-778.e5
pubmed: 29456146
Gene. 2012 Nov 1;509(1):7-15
pubmed: 22921893
Gene. 2007 Oct 15;401(1-2):165-71
pubmed: 17716834
PLoS Genet. 2007 Nov;3(11):e210
pubmed: 18081425
Nature. 2014 Oct 16;514(7522):317-21
pubmed: 25274300
Genes Dev. 2019 Sep 1;33(17-18):1098-1116
pubmed: 31481535
Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2008 Dec;38(12):1046-57
pubmed: 19280695
Cell. 2002 May 3;109(3):371-81
pubmed: 12015986
Nat Commun. 2012 Jan 10;3:621
pubmed: 22233631
PLoS Genet. 2019 Feb 1;15(2):e1007965
pubmed: 30707693
Genome Biol Evol. 2012;4(8):689-99
pubmed: 22798449
Mob DNA. 2012 Sep 26;3(1):14
pubmed: 23013939
Bioinformatics. 2019 Mar 15;35(6):1051-1052
pubmed: 30165587
Dev Dyn. 2009 Sep;238(9):2202-10
pubmed: 19347955
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2018 Apr;49:15-24
pubmed: 29505963
Mol Biol Evol. 2000 May;17(5):804-12
pubmed: 10779541
Nat Rev Genet. 2017 Feb;18(2):71-86
pubmed: 27867194
Annu Rev Genet. 2007;41:331-68
pubmed: 18076328
Hum Genet. 2010 Feb;127(2):135-54
pubmed: 19823873
Biochem Soc Trans. 2008 Aug;36(Pt 4):641-7
pubmed: 18631133
Dev Biol. 2017 Jun 15;426(2):393-400
pubmed: 27297884
Zookeys. 2020 Jun 04;938:97-124
pubmed: 32550787
Mob DNA. 2016 Aug 11;7:16
pubmed: 27525044
Mol Biol Evol. 2019 Jul 1;36(7):1405-1417
pubmed: 30865231
Mol Biol Evol. 2015 Jan;32(1):268-74
pubmed: 25371430
Genome Biol Evol. 2016 Dec 14;8(11):3301-3322
pubmed: 27702814
Mob DNA. 2019 Dec 12;10:48
pubmed: 31857828
Dev Biol. 2005 Jul 15;283(2):446-58
pubmed: 15936749
Genes Dev. 2011 Sep 15;25(18):1982-96
pubmed: 21937715
Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 1;25(15):1972-3
pubmed: 19505945
Genome Biol. 2018 Jul 9;19(1):85
pubmed: 29983116
Genetica. 2011 Jan;139(1):149-54
pubmed: 21210187
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jan 4;45(D1):D200-D203
pubmed: 27899674
Mob DNA. 2019 Nov 3;10:42
pubmed: 31700550
J Hered. 2017 Mar 1;108(2):163-175
pubmed: 28003372
Gene. 2009 Dec 15;448(2):207-13
pubmed: 19651192
Genetics. 2005 Feb;169(2):1033-43
pubmed: 15731520
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D758-63
pubmed: 23143105
Trends Genet. 2017 Nov;33(11):817-831
pubmed: 28844698
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jul;35(Web Server issue):W265-8
pubmed: 17485477
Mol Biol Evol. 2003 May;20(5):674-85
pubmed: 12679549
Nat Commun. 2019 Dec 17;10(1):5757
pubmed: 31848330
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2009 Dec;19(6):607-12
pubmed: 19914058
Nat Methods. 2017 Jun;14(6):587-589
pubmed: 28481363
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1872-88
pubmed: 17556756
Chromosome Res. 2018 Mar;26(1-2):5-23
pubmed: 29332159
Mob DNA. 2013 Oct 02;4(1):21
pubmed: 24088337
Nature. 2016 Oct 27;538(7626):533-536
pubmed: 27760113
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Dec 19;372(1736):
pubmed: 29109221
J Evol Biol. 2014 Dec;27(12):2573-84
pubmed: 25290698
Bioinformatics. 2010 Mar 15;26(6):841-2
pubmed: 20110278
Genes Dev. 2002 Sep 15;16(18):2415-27
pubmed: 12231630
Mol Biol Evol. 2008 Apr;25(4):787-94
pubmed: 18258610
Mob DNA. 2015 Jan 17;6(1):3
pubmed: 25606061
Nat Rev Genet. 2007 Dec;8(12):973-82
pubmed: 17984973
Nature. 2012 Jul 5;487(7405):94-8
pubmed: 22722851
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Dec 15;10:421
pubmed: 20003500
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Mar 19;32(5):1792-7
pubmed: 15034147
Annu Rev Genet. 2012;46:21-42
pubmed: 22905872
Cell. 2011 Nov 23;147(5):1171-85
pubmed: 22118469
Bioessays. 2009 Jul;31(7):703-14
pubmed: 19415638
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Feb 21;114(8):E1460-E1469
pubmed: 28179571
Genetica. 2002 May;115(1):49-63
pubmed: 12188048