External validation of the VENUSS prognostic model to predict recurrence after surgery in non-metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma: A multi-institutional analysis.


Journal

Urologic oncology
ISSN: 1873-2496
Titre abrégé: Urol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9805460

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2022
Historique:
received: 11 09 2021
revised: 26 12 2021
accepted: 11 01 2022
pubmed: 18 2 2022
medline: 11 5 2022
entrez: 17 2 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Recently, VENUSS (VEnous extension, NUclear Grade, Size, Stage), as a prognostic model, was defined to predict disease recurrence (DR) after curative surgery of non-metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma (papRCC). This study aimed to validate the VENUSS prognostic model in a large multi-institutional European cohort of patients with histopathologically proven papRCC after curative surgery for non-metastatic disease. Overall, 980 patients undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy for sporadic, unilateral and non-metastatic papRCC between 1987 and 2020 were included from 7 European tertiary institutions. The primary outcome was the prediction of DR by VENUSS score and VENUSS risk groups. Chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, Cox-regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used in statistical methods. The Concordance (C) Index was calculated to assess model's discriminatory power. The median age was 64 (IQR:55-70) years and 82.6 % (n = 809) of patients were male. Median VENUSS score was 2 (IQR: 0-4), and 62.9 % (n = 617), 23.9 % (n = 234) and 13.2 % (n = 129) of patients was classified into low, intermediate and high risk according to the VENUSS model, respectively. At a median follow-up of 48 (IQR:23-88) months, the disease recurred in 6.6%, 18.8% and 63.8%, and the 5-year recurrence-free survival was 93.8%, 80.7% and 26.7% in low, intermediate and high-risk groups, respectively. (P < 0.001) Each increase in VENUSS score had 1.52-fold (95%CI:1.45-1.60, P < 0.001) DR risk. Compared with the VENUSS low risk, the intermediate risk had a 2.91-fold increased DR risk (95%CI:1.90-4.46, P < 0.001) and 17.9-fold (95%CI:12.25-26.25, P < 0.001) in high risk, while it was 6.07-fold greater in high risk vs. intermediate risk (95%CI:4.17-8.83, P < 0.001). The discrimination was 81.2% (95%CI:77.5%-84.8%) for the VENUSS score, and 78.6% (95%CI:74.8%-82.4%) for VENUSS risk groups, respectively. Both the VENUSS score and groups were well calibrated. This contemporary multi-institutional European large dataset validated the use of VENUSS score and VENUSS risk groups on the prediction of DR after curative surgery in patients with non-metastatic papRCC. The VENUSS prognostic model can provide valuable information for patient counselling, follow-up and patient selection for adjuvant trials.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35172939
pii: S1078-1439(22)00005-9
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.01.006
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

198.e9-198.e17

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Selcuk Erdem (S)

Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey; European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands. Electronic address: erdemselcuk1@gmail.com.

Umberto Capitanio (U)

Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

Riccardo Campi (R)

European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Maria Carme Mir (MC)

Department of Urology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain.

Eduard Roussel (E)

European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Nicola Pavan (N)

European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Urology Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Science, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.

Onder Kara (O)

European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Department of Urology, Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey.

Tobias Klatte (T)

Department of Urology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Maximilian C Kriegmair (MC)

European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, Netherlands; Department of Urology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.

Enes Degirmenci (E)

Department of Urology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Resat Aydin (R)

Department of Urology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Andrea Minervini (A)

Unit of Urological Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Robotic Surgery and Andrology, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Sergio Serni (S)

Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Alessandro Berni (A)

Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.

Giacomo Rebez (G)

Department of Urology, Fundacion Instituto Valenciano Oncologia, Valencia, Spain; Urology Clinic, Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Science, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.

Faruk Ozcan (F)

Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH