DENOISING SWEPT SOURCE OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY VOLUMETRIC SCANS USING A DEEP LEARNING MODEL.
Journal
Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)
ISSN: 1539-2864
Titre abrégé: Retina
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309919
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2022
01 03 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
18
2
2022
medline:
5
3
2022
entrez:
17
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the use of a deep learning noise reduction model on swept source optical coherence tomography volumetric scans. Three groups of images including single-line highly averaged foveal scans (averaged images), foveal B-scans from volumetric scans using no averaging (unaveraged images), and deep learning denoised versions of the latter (denoised images) were obtained. We evaluated the potential increase in the signal-to-noise ratio by evaluating the contrast-to-noise ratio of the resultant images and measured the multiscale structural similarity index to determine whether the unaveraged and denoised images held true in structure to the averaged images. We evaluated the practical effects of denoising on a popular metric of choroidal vascularity known as the choroidal vascularity index. Ten eyes of 10 subjects with a mean age of 31 years (range 24-64 years) were evaluated. The deep choroidal contrast-to-noise ratio mean values of the averaged and denoised image groups were similar (7.06 vs. 6.81, P = 0.75), and both groups had better maximum contrast-to-noise ratio mean values (27.65 and 46.34) than the unaveraged group (14.75; P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). The mean multiscale structural similarity index of the average-denoised images was significantly higher than the one from the averaged--unaveraged images (0.85 vs. 0.61, P < 0.001). Choroidal vascularity index values from averaged and denoised images were similar (71.81 vs. 71.16, P = 0.554). Using three different metrics, we demonstrated that the deep learning denoising model can produce high-quality images that emulate, and may exceed, the quality of highly averaged scans.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35175017
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003348
pii: 00006982-202203000-00006
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
450-455Références
Spaide RF, Koizumi H, Pozzoni MC. Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;146:496–500.
Uji A, Balasubramanian S, Lei J, et al. Choriocapillaris imaging using multiple en face optical coherence tomography angiography image averaging. JAMA Ophthalmol 2017;135:1197–1204.
Pichi F, Aggarwal K, Neri P, et al. Choroidal biomarkers. Indian J Ophthalmol 2018;66:1716–1726.
Spaide RF, Ledesma-Gil G, Mullins RF. The varying optical coherence tomography appearance of the inner choroid with age: possible explanation and histologic correlate. Retina 2021;41:1071–1075.
Spaide RF, Ledesma-Gil G. A novel method for image averaging of optical coherence tomography angiography images. Retina 2020;40:2099–2105.
Spaide RF, Fujimoto JG, Waheed NK. Image artifacts in optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina 2015;35:2163–2180.
Lehtinen J, Munkberg JH, Laine S, et al. Noise2noise: Learning Image Restoration without Clean Data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.04189. 2018.
Mao Z, Miki A, Mei S, et al. Deep learning based noise reduction method for automatic 3D segmentation of the anterior of lamina cribrosa in optical coherence tomography volumetric scans. Bioomed Opt Express 2019;10:5832–5851.
Zhang K, Zuo W, Chen Y, et al. Beyond a Gaussian denoiser: residual learning of deep CNN for image denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process 2017;26:3142–3155.
Zhang K, Zuo W, Zhang L. Ffdnet: toward a fast and flexible solution for cnn based image denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process 2018;27:4608–4622.
Wolterink JM, Leiner T, Viergever MA, et al. Generative adversarial networks for noise reduction in low-dose ct. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2017;3:2536–2545.
Dong W, Wang P, Yin W, et al. Denoising prior driven deep neural network for image restoration. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.06756. 2018.
Guo S, Yan Z, Zhang K, et al. Toward convolutional blind denoising of real photographs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.04686.2018.
Weigert M, Schmidt U, Boothe T, et al. Content-aware image restoration: pushing the limits of fluorescence microscopy. Nat Methods 2018;15:1090–1097.
Ma Y, Chen X, Zhu W, et al. Speckle noise reduction in optical coherence tomography images based on edge-sensitive cgan. Biomed Opt Express 2018;9:5129–5146.
Halupka KJ, Antony BJ, Lee MH, et al. Retinal optical coherence tomography image enhancement via deep learning. Biomed Opt Express 2018;9:6205–6221.
Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, et al. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 2004;13:600–612.
Wang Z, Simoncelli EP, Bovik AC. Multi-scale structural similarity for image quality assessment. In Proceedings of the 37th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers 2003, pp. 529–554.
Renieblas GP, Nogués AT, González AM, et al. Structural similarity index family for image quality assessment in radiological images. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2017;4:035501.
Tan KA, Agrawal R. Luminal and stromal areas of choroid determined by binarization method of optical coherence tomographic images. Am J Ophthalmol 2015;160:394.
Agrawal R, Gupta P, Tan KA, et al. Choroidal vascularity index as a measure of vascular status of the choroid: measurements in healthy eyes from a population-based study. Sci Rep 2016;6:21090.
Agrawal R, Seen S, Vaishnavi S, et al. Choroidal vascularity index using swept-source and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a comparative study. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2019;50:e26–e32.
Haidekker M Advanced Biomedical Image Analysis. Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, 2011.