Metal removal capability of two cyanobacterial species in autotrophic and mixotrophic mode of nutrition.


Journal

BMC microbiology
ISSN: 1471-2180
Titre abrégé: BMC Microbiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100966981

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 02 2022
Historique:
received: 12 05 2021
accepted: 10 02 2022
entrez: 18 2 2022
pubmed: 19 2 2022
medline: 8 3 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cyanobacteria are ecologically significant prokaryotes that can be found in heavy metals contaminated environments. As their photosynthetic machinery imposes high demands for metals, homeostasis of these micronutrients has been extensively considered in cyanobacteria. Recently, most studies have been focused on different habitats using microalgae leads to a remarkable reduction of an array of organic and inorganic nutrients, but what takes place in the extracellular environment when cells are exposed to external supplementation with heavy metals remains largely unknown. Here, extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) production in strains Nostoc sp. N27P72 and Nostoc sp. FB71 was isolated from different habitats and thenthe results were compared and reported. Cultures of both strains, supplemented separately with either glucose, sucrose, lactose, or maltose showed that production of EPS and cell dry weight were boosted by maltose supplementation. The production of EPS (9.1 ± 0.05 μg/ml) and increase in cell dry weight (1.01 ± 0.06 g/l) were comparatively high in Nostoc sp. N27P72 which was isolated from lime stones.The cultures were evaluated for their ability to remove Cu (II), Cr (III), and Ni (II) in culture media with and without maltose. The crude EPS showed metal adsorption capacity assuming the order Ni (II) > Cu (II) > Cr (III) from the metal-binding experiments.Nickel was preferentially biosorbed with a maximal uptake of 188.8 ± 0.14 mg (g cell dry wt) The results of this studyindicatede that strains Nostoc sp. N27P72 can be a good candidate for the commercial production of EPS and might be utilized in bioremediation field as an alternative to synthetic and abiotic flocculants.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Cyanobacteria are ecologically significant prokaryotes that can be found in heavy metals contaminated environments. As their photosynthetic machinery imposes high demands for metals, homeostasis of these micronutrients has been extensively considered in cyanobacteria. Recently, most studies have been focused on different habitats using microalgae leads to a remarkable reduction of an array of organic and inorganic nutrients, but what takes place in the extracellular environment when cells are exposed to external supplementation with heavy metals remains largely unknown.
METHODS
Here, extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) production in strains Nostoc sp. N27P72 and Nostoc sp. FB71 was isolated from different habitats and thenthe results were compared and reported.
RESULT
Cultures of both strains, supplemented separately with either glucose, sucrose, lactose, or maltose showed that production of EPS and cell dry weight were boosted by maltose supplementation. The production of EPS (9.1 ± 0.05 μg/ml) and increase in cell dry weight (1.01 ± 0.06 g/l) were comparatively high in Nostoc sp. N27P72 which was isolated from lime stones.The cultures were evaluated for their ability to remove Cu (II), Cr (III), and Ni (II) in culture media with and without maltose. The crude EPS showed metal adsorption capacity assuming the order Ni (II) > Cu (II) > Cr (III) from the metal-binding experiments.Nickel was preferentially biosorbed with a maximal uptake of 188.8 ± 0.14 mg (g cell dry wt)
CONCLUSION
The results of this studyindicatede that strains Nostoc sp. N27P72 can be a good candidate for the commercial production of EPS and might be utilized in bioremediation field as an alternative to synthetic and abiotic flocculants.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35176992
doi: 10.1186/s12866-022-02471-8
pii: 10.1186/s12866-022-02471-8
pmc: PMC8851847
doi:

Substances chimiques

Metals, Heavy 0
Organic Chemicals 0
Copper 789U1901C5

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

58

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Carbohydr Polym. 2017 Jan 20;156:1-8
pubmed: 27842803
Microbiology (Reading). 2011 Feb;157(Pt 2):451-458
pubmed: 20966085
J Biotechnol. 2003 Apr 24;102(2):143-52
pubmed: 12697392
Exp Suppl. 2012;101:133-64
pubmed: 22945569
Phytochemistry. 2021 Dec;192:112959
pubmed: 34649057
J Basic Microbiol. 2007 Apr;47(2):103-17
pubmed: 17440912
J Nat Prod. 2014 Aug 22;77(8):1784-90
pubmed: 25069058
Iran J Biotechnol. 2019 Apr 20;17(2):e1853
pubmed: 31457050
J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2021 Mar 22;:1-17
pubmed: 33749496
Biotechnol Rep (Amst). 2016 Dec 23;13:58-71
pubmed: 28352564
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Nov;71(11):7327-33
pubmed: 16269775
J Appl Toxicol. 2020 Dec 2;:
pubmed: 33289164
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):15-21
pubmed: 29379350
Aquat Toxicol. 2006 Dec 30;80(4):338-45
pubmed: 17098300
Biomed Environ Sci. 1991 Sep;4(3):250-61
pubmed: 1764214
Carbohydr Polym. 2018 Jan 1;179:228-243
pubmed: 29111047
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2008 Sep;15(6):478-80
pubmed: 18688670
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Sep;100(17):7765-75
pubmed: 27188779
J Proteomics. 2015 Apr 29;120:75-94
pubmed: 25779463
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2017 Oct;183(2):582-600
pubmed: 28889346
Front Microbiol. 2016 Jun 07;7:878
pubmed: 27375598
J Bacteriol. 2000 Feb;182(4):974-82
pubmed: 10648523
Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2000 Jan 1;8(2):95-101
pubmed: 10867368
J Phycol. 2000 Aug 26;36(4):675-679
pubmed: 29542156
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Dec;26(35):35860-35870
pubmed: 31707616
J Appl Microbiol. 2015 Feb;118(2):356-67
pubmed: 25376444
J Hazard Mater. 2007 Sep 5;148(1-2):383-6
pubmed: 17403568
Biotechnol Adv. 2016 Nov 15;34(7):1159-1179
pubmed: 27530696
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2009 Sep;33(5):917-41
pubmed: 19453747
Carbohydr Res. 2008 Feb 4;343(2):308-16
pubmed: 18048014
Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 2001;18:375-404
pubmed: 11530697
J Appl Microbiol. 2008 Jul;105(1):88-94
pubmed: 18248368
Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2005 Feb;19(2):357-65
pubmed: 21783496
Life (Basel). 2015 Apr 01;5(2):1218-38
pubmed: 25837843
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008 May;74(9):2797-804
pubmed: 18326679
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010 Jan;160(2):552-60
pubmed: 19018481
Carbohydr Polym. 2014 Jan 30;101:50-6
pubmed: 24299748

Auteurs

Elham Ghorbani (E)

Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Converging Sciences and Technologies, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran.

Bahareh Nowruzi (B)

Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Converging Sciences and Technologies, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran. bahareh.nowruzi@srbiau.ac.ir.

Masoumeh Nezhadali (M)

Department of Biology, Islamshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Islamshahr, Iran.

Azadeh Hekmat (A)

Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Converging Sciences and Technologies, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran.

Articles similaires

Nigeria Environmental Monitoring Solid Waste Waste Disposal Facilities Refuse Disposal
Oryza Soil Pollutants Risk Assessment Metals, Heavy Humans

Prenatal metal exposures and kidney function in adolescence in Project Viva.

Natalie F Price, Pi-I D Lin, Andres Cardenas et al.
1.00
Humans Adolescent Female Pregnancy Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects
Geologic Sediments Environmental Monitoring Water Pollutants, Chemical Seasons Metals, Heavy

Classifications MeSH