Dementia and primary care teams: obstacles to the implementation of Portugal's Dementia Strategy.
carer
dementia
general practitioner
health services
person with dementia
practice nurse
primary care
qualitative methods
social worker
teamwork
Journal
Primary health care research & development
ISSN: 1477-1128
Titre abrégé: Prim Health Care Res Dev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100897390
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 02 2022
18 02 2022
Historique:
entrez:
18
2
2022
pubmed:
19
2
2022
medline:
15
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Portugal has a Dementia Strategy that endorses care coordination in the community, but the strategy is not implemented despite there being a network of multidisciplinary primary care clinics that could support it. Recent research into barriers to dementia management in primary care has focused essentially on general practitioners' (GPs) factors and perspectives. A comprehensive triangulated view on the barriers to dementia management emphasising teamwork is missing. To explore the barriers to the implementation of the Portuguese Dementia Strategy by primary care teams, from the perspectives of service users and professionals. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 10 GPs, 8 practice nurses, 4 social workers, 8 people with dementia and 10 family carers from 6 practices in different social contexts within the Lisbon metropolitan area. The analytical framework combined codes derived from the transcripts with codes from the available literature. Themes focused on the access to professionals/community services, care coordination within healthcare teams, and between health and community services. Several system barriers were identified (undefined roles/coordination within teams, time constraints, insufficient signposting to community services) along with individual barriers (limited competence in dementia, unrecognised autonomy, limited views on social health and quality of life (QoL)), hindering users access to dementia services. Enhanced competence in dementia, and nurse-led systematic care of people with dementia and their carers, are necessary. They can be effective in improving the QoL in dementia, but only if associated with better community support.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Portugal has a Dementia Strategy that endorses care coordination in the community, but the strategy is not implemented despite there being a network of multidisciplinary primary care clinics that could support it. Recent research into barriers to dementia management in primary care has focused essentially on general practitioners' (GPs) factors and perspectives. A comprehensive triangulated view on the barriers to dementia management emphasising teamwork is missing.
AIM
To explore the barriers to the implementation of the Portuguese Dementia Strategy by primary care teams, from the perspectives of service users and professionals.
METHODS
Purposive sampling was used to recruit 10 GPs, 8 practice nurses, 4 social workers, 8 people with dementia and 10 family carers from 6 practices in different social contexts within the Lisbon metropolitan area. The analytical framework combined codes derived from the transcripts with codes from the available literature. Themes focused on the access to professionals/community services, care coordination within healthcare teams, and between health and community services.
FINDINGS
Several system barriers were identified (undefined roles/coordination within teams, time constraints, insufficient signposting to community services) along with individual barriers (limited competence in dementia, unrecognised autonomy, limited views on social health and quality of life (QoL)), hindering users access to dementia services.
CONCLUSION
Enhanced competence in dementia, and nurse-led systematic care of people with dementia and their carers, are necessary. They can be effective in improving the QoL in dementia, but only if associated with better community support.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35177149
pii: S1463423621000876
doi: 10.1017/S1463423621000876
pmc: PMC8919178
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e10Références
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 May 22;18(1):66
pubmed: 28532475
Gerontologist. 2019 Nov 16;59(6):e697-e708
pubmed: 29939234
BMC Fam Pract. 2010 Jul 01;11:52
pubmed: 20594302
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Sep;29(9):1413-1423
pubmed: 28416036
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Aug;64(8):1724-30
pubmed: 27355394
Aging Ment Health. 2015;19(10):912-20
pubmed: 25393131
Age Ageing. 2017 May 1;46(3):518-521
pubmed: 27932369
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Jan;63(1):24-38
pubmed: 25597556
Acta Med Port. 2021 Feb 1;34(2):169-170
pubmed: 33641709
Lancet. 2021 Feb 13;397(10274):568-569
pubmed: 33581812
Neurology. 1993 Nov;43(11):2412-4
pubmed: 8232972
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jun 4;18(1):131
pubmed: 29866102
Aging Ment Health. 2001 May;5 Suppl 1:S35-48
pubmed: 11513496
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Nov;22(11):1487-92
pubmed: 17823840
Acta Med Port. 2019 May 31;32(5):355-367
pubmed: 31166896
Psychol Health. 2010 Dec;25(10):1229-45
pubmed: 20204937
Dementia (London). 2018 Jul;17(5):596-608
pubmed: 27288459
Can Geriatr J. 2012 Sep;15(3):85-94
pubmed: 23259021
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Mar-Apr;12(2):166-71
pubmed: 24615313
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2017 May;50(Suppl 2):68-77
pubmed: 28364258
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Jul 13;21(1):141
pubmed: 32660419
Aging Ment Health. 2017 Jan;21(1):4-17
pubmed: 27869503
Aging Ment Health. 2021 Dec;25(12):2298-2309
pubmed: 33030026
Dementia (London). 2021 Aug;20(6):1988-2006
pubmed: 33342279
Health Syst Transit. 2011;13(4):1-156
pubmed: 22222781