Barriers and facilitators of use of analytics for strategic health and care decision-making: a qualitative study of senior health and care leaders' perspectives.
health informatics
health services administration & management
organisation of health services
organisational development
qualitative research
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 02 2022
17 02 2022
Historique:
entrez:
18
2
2022
pubmed:
19
2
2022
medline:
21
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study investigated the barriers and facilitators that senior leaders' experience when using knowledge generated from the analysis of administrative health or care records ('analytics') to inform strategic health and care decision-making. One London-based sustainability and transformation partnership (STP) in England, as it was on the cusp of forming an integrated care system (ICS). 20 senior leaders, including health and social care commissioners, public health leads and health providers. Participants were eligible for inclusion if they were a senior leader of a constituent organisation of the STP and involved in using analytics to make decisions for their own organisations or health and care systems. Semi-structured interviews conducted between January 2020 and March 2020 and analysed using the framework method to generate common themes. Organisational fragmentation hindered use of analytics by creating siloed data systems, barriers to data sharing and different organisational priorities. Where trusted and collaborative relationships existed between leaders and analysts, organisational barriers were circumvented and access to and support for analytics facilitated. Trusted and collaborative relationships between individual leaders of different organisations also aided cross-organisational priority setting, which was a key facilitator of strategic health and care decision-making and use of analytics. Data linked across health and care settings were viewed as an enabler of use of analytics for decision-making, while concerns around data quality often stopped analytics use as a part of decision-making, with participants relying more so on expert opinion or intuition. The UK Governments' 2021 White Paper set out aspirations for data to transform care. While necessary, policy changes to facilitate data sharing across organisations will be insufficient to realise this aim. Better integration of organisations with aligned priorities could support and sustain cross-organisational relationships between leaders and analysts, and leaders of different organisations, to facilitate use of analytics in decision-making.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35177457
pii: bmjopen-2021-055504
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055504
pmc: PMC8860022
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e055504Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: SH is employed by and JS is seconded for part of her time in one of the organisations within the STP case study site.
Références
J Health Organ Manag. 2011;25(3):298-314
pubmed: 21845984
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Feb;34(2):115-26
pubmed: 26497003
Implement Sci. 2017 Dec 04;12(1):145
pubmed: 29202772
BMJ Open. 2013 Sep 06;3(9):e003341
pubmed: 24014483
BMJ. 2008 Aug 07;337:a1035
pubmed: 18687726
Implement Sci. 2017 Apr 20;12(1):53
pubmed: 28427465
BMJ Open. 2013 May 28;3(5):
pubmed: 23793669
BMC Public Health. 2008 May 22;8:173
pubmed: 18498632
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
J Public Health (Oxf). 2015 Sep;37(3):461-9
pubmed: 25320074
BMJ. 1995 Jul 22;311(6999):251-3
pubmed: 7627048
Health Promot Int. 2011 Dec;26(4):408-20
pubmed: 21330307
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51
pubmed: 24979285
BMC Public Health. 2014 Nov 05;14:1144
pubmed: 25377061