Cryo-EM structure of the nuclear ring from Xenopus laevis nuclear pore complex.
Journal
Cell research
ISSN: 1748-7838
Titre abrégé: Cell Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9425763
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
received:
25
11
2021
accepted:
21
12
2021
pubmed:
19
2
2022
medline:
6
4
2022
entrez:
18
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Nuclear pore complex (NPC) shuttles cargo across the nuclear envelope. Here we present single-particle cryo-EM structure of the nuclear ring (NR) subunit from Xenopus laevis NPC at an average resolution of 5.6 Å. The NR subunit comprises two 10-membered Y complexes, each with the nucleoporin ELYS closely associating with Nup160 and Nup37 of the long arm. Unlike the cytoplasmic ring (CR) or inner ring (IR), the NR subunit contains only one molecule each of Nup205 and Nup93. Nup205 binds both arms of the Y complexes and interacts with the stem of inner Y complex from the neighboring subunit. Nup93 connects the stems of inner and outer Y complexes within the same NR subunit, and places its N-terminal extended helix into the axial groove of Nup205 from the neighboring subunit. Together with other structural information, we have generated a composite atomic model of the central ring scaffold that includes the NR, IR, and CR. The IR is connected to the two outer rings mainly through Nup155. This model facilitates functional understanding of vertebrate NPC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35177819
doi: 10.1038/s41422-021-00610-w
pii: 10.1038/s41422-021-00610-w
pmc: PMC8976044
doi:
Substances chimiques
NUP155 protein, Xenopus
0
Nuclear Pore Complex Proteins
0
Xenopus Proteins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
349-358Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Strambio-De-Castillia, C., Niepel, M. & Rout, M. P. The nuclear pore complex: bridging nuclear transport and gene regulation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 490–501 (2010).
pubmed: 20571586
doi: 10.1038/nrm2928
Beck, M. & Hurt, E. The nuclear pore complex: understanding its function through structural insight. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 73–89 (2017).
pubmed: 27999437
doi: 10.1038/nrm.2016.147
von Appen, A. & Beck, M. Structure determination of the nuclear pore complex with three-dimensional cryo electron microscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 2001–2010 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.01.004
Lin, D. H. & Hoelz, A. The structure of the nuclear pore complex (an update). Annu. Rev. Biochem. 88, 725–783 (2019).
pubmed: 30883195
pmcid: 6588426
doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-011901
Allegretti, M. et al. In-cell architecture of the nuclear pore and snapshots of its turnover. Nature 586, 796–800 (2020).
pubmed: 32879490
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2670-5
Zimmerli C. E. et al. Nuclear pores dilate and constrict in cellulo. Science 374, eabd9776 (2021).
pubmed: 34762489
doi: 10.1126/science.abd9776
Schuller, A. P. et al. The cellular environment shapes the nuclear pore complex architecture. Nature 598, 667–671 (2021).
pubmed: 34646014
pmcid: 8550940
doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03985-3
Rout, M. P. et al. The yeast nuclear pore complex: composition, architecture, and transport mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 148, 635–651 (2000).
pubmed: 10684247
pmcid: 2169373
doi: 10.1083/jcb.148.4.635
Schwartz, T. U. The structure inventory of the nuclear pore complex. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 1986–2000 (2016).
pubmed: 27016207
pmcid: 4886551
doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.03.015
Fernandez-Martinez, J. & Rout, M. P. One ring to rule them all? Structural and functional diversity in the nuclear pore complex. Trends Biochem. Sci. 46, 595–607 (2021).
pubmed: 33563541
doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2021.01.003
Reichelt, R. et al. Correlation between structure and mass distribution of the nuclear pore complex and of distinct pore complex components. J. Cell Biol. 110, 883–894 (1990).
pubmed: 2324201
doi: 10.1083/jcb.110.4.883
Hoelz, A., Debler, E. W. & Blobel, G. The structure of the nuclear pore complex. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 80, 613–643 (2011).
pubmed: 21495847
doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060109-151030
Grossman, E., Medalia, O. & Zwerger, M. Functional architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 41, 557–584 (2012).
pubmed: 22577827
doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-050511-102328
Akey, C. W. & Radermacher, M. Architecture of the Xenopus nuclear pore complex revealed by three-dimensional cryoelectron microscopy. J. Cell Biol. 122, 1–19 (1993).
pubmed: 8314837
doi: 10.1083/jcb.122.1.1
Hampoelz, B., Andres-Pons, A., Kastritis, P. & Beck, M. Structure and assembly of the nuclear pore complex. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 48, 515–536 (2019).
pubmed: 30943044
doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-052118-115308
Kosinski, J. et al. Molecular architecture of the inner ring scaffold of the human nuclear pore complex. Science 352, 363–365 (2016).
pubmed: 27081072
pmcid: 8926079
doi: 10.1126/science.aaf0643
Lin, D. H. et al. Architecture of the symmetric core of the nuclear pore. Science 352, aaf1015 (2016).
pubmed: 27081075
pmcid: 5207208
doi: 10.1126/science.aaf1015
Zila, V. et al. Cone-shaped HIV-1 capsids are transported through intact nuclear pores. Cell 184, 1032–1046.e18 (2021).
pubmed: 33571428
pmcid: 7895898
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.025
Nordeen, S. A., Turman, D. L. & Schwartz, T. U. Yeast Nup84-Nup133 complex structure details flexibility and reveals conservation of the membrane anchoring ALPS motif. Nat. Commun. 11, 6060 (2020).
pubmed: 33247142
pmcid: 7695694
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19885-5
Nordeen, S. A. et al. A nanobody suite for yeast scaffold nucleoporins provides details of the nuclear pore complex structure. Nat. Commun. 11, 6179 (2020).
pubmed: 33268786
pmcid: 7710722
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19884-6
von Appen, A. et al. In situ structural analysis of the human nuclear pore complex. Nature 526, 140–143 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/nature15381
Zhang, Y. et al. Molecular architecture of the luminal ring of the Xenopus laevis nuclear pore complex. Cell Res. 30, 532–540 (2020).
pubmed: 32367042
pmcid: 7264284
doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0320-y
Huang, G. et al. Structure of the cytoplasmic ring of the Xenopus laevis nuclear pore complex by cryo-electron microscopy single particle analysis. Cell Res. 30, 520–531 (2020).
pubmed: 32376910
pmcid: 7264146
doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0319-4
Zhu, X. et al. Near-atomic structure of the cytoplasmic ring of the Xenopus laevis nuclear pore complex. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.14.480321 (2022).
Huang, G. et al. Cryo-EM structure of the inner ring from Xenopus laevis nuclear pore complex. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.13.468242 (2021).
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
pubmed: 34265844
pmcid: 8371605
doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
Rasala, B. A., Orjalo, A. V., Shen, Z., Briggs, S. & Forbes, D. J. ELYS is a dual nucleoporin/kinetochore protein required for nuclear pore assembly and proper cell division. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 17801–17806 (2006).
pubmed: 17098863
pmcid: 1635652
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608484103
Franz, C. et al. MEL-28/ELYS is required for the recruitment of nucleoporins to chromatin and postmitotic nuclear pore complex assembly. EMBO Rep. 8, 165–172 (2007).
pubmed: 17235358
pmcid: 1796766
doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400889
Bilokapic, S. & Schwartz, T. U. Structural and functional studies of the 252 kDa nucleoporin ELYS reveal distinct roles for its three tethered domains. Structure 21, 572–580 (2013).
pubmed: 23499022
pmcid: 4077343
doi: 10.1016/j.str.2013.02.006
Gillespie, P. J., Khoudoli, G. A., Stewart, G., Swedlow, J. R. & Blow, J. J. ELYS/MEL-28 chromatin association coordinates nuclear pore complex assembly and replication licensing. Curr. Biol. 17, 1657–1662 (2007).
pubmed: 17825564
pmcid: 2267255
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.041
Watson, M. L. Further observations on the nuclear envelope of the animal cell. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 6, 147–156 (1959).
pubmed: 13843146
pmcid: 2229792
doi: 10.1083/jcb.6.2.147
Guttinger, S., Laurell, E. & Kutay, U. Orchestrating nuclear envelope disassembly and reassembly during mitosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 178–191 (2009).
pubmed: 19234477
doi: 10.1038/nrm2641
Mans, B. J., Anantharaman, V., Aravind, L. & Koonin, E. V. Comparative genomics, evolution and origins of the nuclear envelope and nuclear pore complex. Cell Cycle 3, 1612–1637 (2004).
pubmed: 15611647
doi: 10.4161/cc.3.12.1316
Andersen, K. R. et al. Scaffold nucleoporins Nup188 and Nup192 share structural and functional properties with nuclear transport receptors. Elife 2, e00745 (2013).
pubmed: 23795296
pmcid: 3679522
doi: 10.7554/eLife.00745
Stuwe, T. et al. Architecture of the fungal nuclear pore inner ring complex. Science 350, 56–64 (2015).
pubmed: 26316600
pmcid: 4826903
doi: 10.1126/science.aac9176
Mosalaganti, S. et al. Artificial intelligence reveals nuclear pore complexity. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.26.465776 (2021).
Petrovic, S. et al. Architecture of the linker-scaffold in the nuclear pore. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.26.465796 (2021).
Bley, C. J. et al. Architecture of the cytoplasmic face of the nuclear pore. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.26.465790 (2021).
Akey C. W. et al. Comprehensive structure and functional adaptations of the yeast nuclear pore complex. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.12.015 (2021).
Ren, H. et al. Determining the architecture of nuclear ring of Xenopus laevis nuclear pore complex using integrated approaches. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.10.468004 (2021).
Tai, L. et al. 8 Å structure of the cytoplasmic ring of the Xenopus laevis nuclear pore complex solved by cryo-EM and AI. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.10.468011 (2021).
Ren, H. et al. 8 Å structure of the nuclear ring of the Xenopus laevis nuclear pore complex solved by cryo-EM and AI. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.10.468008 (2021).
Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).
pubmed: 28250466
pmcid: 5494038
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4193
Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. Elife 7, e42166 (2018).
pubmed: 30412051
pmcid: 6250425
doi: 10.7554/eLife.42166
Zhang, K. Gctf: Real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 193, 1–12 (2016).
pubmed: 26592709
pmcid: 4711343
doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.11.003
Tan, Y. Z. et al. Addressing preferred specimen orientation in single-particle cryo-EM through tilting. Nat. Methods 14, 793–796 (2017).
pubmed: 28671674
pmcid: 5533649
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4347
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
pubmed: 15264254
doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084
Madeira, F. et al. The EMBL-EBI search and sequence analysis tools APIs in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W636–W641 (2019).
pubmed: 30976793
pmcid: 6602479
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz268
Robert, X. & Gouet, P. Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W320–W324 (2014).
pubmed: 24753421
pmcid: 4086106
doi: 10.1093/nar/gku316
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
pubmed: 15572765
doi: 10.1107/S0907444904019158