Prognostic Value of Coronary Sinus Flow Quantification by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Coronary Sinus
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Hyperemia
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Myocardial Infarction
/ diagnostic imaging
Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
/ adverse effects
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction
/ diagnostic imaging
Treatment Outcome
cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
coronary flow reserve
microvascular disease
myocardial blood flow
primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
ISSN: 2047-9980
Titre abrégé: J Am Heart Assoc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580524
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2022
03 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
19
2
2022
medline:
9
4
2022
entrez:
18
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of hyperemic coronary sinus flow (h-CSF) and global coronary flow reserve (g-CFR) obtained by phase-contrast cine-magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). Methods and Results This retrospective study analyzed patients with acute MI (n=523) who underwent primary (ST-segment-elevation MI) or urgent (non-ST-segment-elevation MI) percutaneous coronary intervention. Absolute coronary sinus blood flow (CSF) at rest and during vasodilator stress hyperemia was quantified at 30 days (24-36 days) after the index infarct-related lesion percutaneous coronary intervention and revascularization of functionally significant non-infarct-related lesions. We used Cox proportional hazards regression modeling to examine the association between h-CSF, g-CFR, and major adverse cardiac events defined as all-cause death, nonfatal MI, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, and stroke. Finally, 325 patients with ST-segment-elevation MI (62.1%) and 198 patients with non-ST-segment-elevation MI (37.9%) were studied over a median follow-up of 2.5 years. The rest CSF, h-CSF, and g-CFR were 0.94 (0.68-1.26) mL/min per g, 2.05 (1.42-2.73) mL/min per g, and 2.17 (1.54-3.03), respectively. Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 62 patients, and Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that h-CSF and g-CFR were independent predictors of major adverse cardiac events (h-CSF: hazard ratio [HR], 0.64; 95% CI, 0.47-0.88;
Identifiants
pubmed: 35179042
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.023519
pmc: PMC9075062
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e023519Références
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jul 7;54(2):150-6
pubmed: 19573732
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Aug;12(8 Pt 2):1686-1695
pubmed: 30409558
Circulation. 2017 Feb 7;135(6):566-577
pubmed: 27881570
Eur Heart J. 2018 Mar 7;39(10):840-849
pubmed: 29293969
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001 Mar;13(3):361-6
pubmed: 11241807
JAMA. 2012 Sep 12;308(10):998-1006
pubmed: 22928184
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Jul;33(7):1041-1059
pubmed: 28501910
N Engl J Med. 2007 Feb 22;356(8):830-40
pubmed: 17314342
Am J Med. 2019 Jun;132(6):692-697
pubmed: 30684452
Circulation. 2016 Mar 15;133(11):1135-47
pubmed: 26490017
Circulation. 2015 Jan 6;131(1):19-27
pubmed: 25400060
Circulation. 2017 Dec 12;136(24):2325-2336
pubmed: 28864442
Circulation. 2001 Nov 13;104(20):2401-6
pubmed: 11705815
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Jul 1;21(7):777-786
pubmed: 31620792
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Sep;5(9):893-902
pubmed: 22995875
Circulation. 2020 Apr 21;141(16):1282-1291
pubmed: 32078380
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Oct;12(10):1958-1969
pubmed: 30772231
Circulation. 2011 Nov 15;124(20):2215-24
pubmed: 22007073
Heart. 2012 May;98(9):699-705
pubmed: 22523054
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Apr;5(4):430-40
pubmed: 22498334
Circulation. 2000 Jun 13;101(23):2696-702
pubmed: 10851206
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Feb 19;73(6):684-693
pubmed: 30765035
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Nov;177(5):1161-6
pubmed: 11641194
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Aug 15;70(7):869-879
pubmed: 28797357