Functionally prioritised whole-genome sequence variants improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for heat tolerance.
Journal
Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE
ISSN: 1297-9686
Titre abrégé: Genet Sel Evol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9114088
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Feb 2022
19 Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
04
06
2021
accepted:
03
02
2022
entrez:
20
2
2022
pubmed:
21
2
2022
medline:
23
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Heat tolerance is a trait of economic importance in the context of warm climates and the effects of global warming on livestock production, reproduction, health, and well-being. This study investigated the improvement in prediction accuracy for heat tolerance when selected sets of sequence variants from a large genome-wide association study (GWAS) were combined with a standard 50k single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel used by the dairy industry. Over 40,000 dairy cattle with genotype and phenotype data were analysed. The phenotypes used to measure an individual's heat tolerance were defined as the rate of decline in milk production traits with rising temperature and humidity. We used Holstein and Jersey cows to select sequence variants linked to heat tolerance. The prioritised sequence variants were the most significant SNPs passing a GWAS p-value threshold selected based on sliding 100-kb windows along each chromosome. We used a bull reference set to develop the genomic prediction equations, which were then validated in an independent set of Holstein, Jersey, and crossbred cows. Prediction analyses were performed using the BayesR, BayesRC, and GBLUP methods. The accuracy of genomic prediction for heat tolerance improved by up to 0.07, 0.05, and 0.10 units in Holstein, Jersey, and crossbred cows, respectively, when sets of selected sequence markers from Holstein cows were added to the 50k SNP panel. However, in some scenarios, the prediction accuracy decreased unexpectedly with the largest drop of - 0.10 units for the heat tolerance fat yield trait observed in Jersey cows when 50k plus pre-selected SNPs from Holstein cows were used. Using pre-selected SNPs discovered on a combined set of Holstein and Jersey cows generally improved the accuracy, especially in the Jersey validation. In addition, combining Holstein and Jersey bulls in the reference set generally improved prediction accuracy in most scenarios compared to using only Holstein bulls as the reference set. Informative sequence markers can be prioritised to improve the genomic prediction of heat tolerance in different breeds. In addition to providing biological insight, these variants could also have a direct application for developing customized SNP arrays or can be used via imputation in current industry SNP panels.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Heat tolerance is a trait of economic importance in the context of warm climates and the effects of global warming on livestock production, reproduction, health, and well-being. This study investigated the improvement in prediction accuracy for heat tolerance when selected sets of sequence variants from a large genome-wide association study (GWAS) were combined with a standard 50k single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel used by the dairy industry.
METHODS
METHODS
Over 40,000 dairy cattle with genotype and phenotype data were analysed. The phenotypes used to measure an individual's heat tolerance were defined as the rate of decline in milk production traits with rising temperature and humidity. We used Holstein and Jersey cows to select sequence variants linked to heat tolerance. The prioritised sequence variants were the most significant SNPs passing a GWAS p-value threshold selected based on sliding 100-kb windows along each chromosome. We used a bull reference set to develop the genomic prediction equations, which were then validated in an independent set of Holstein, Jersey, and crossbred cows. Prediction analyses were performed using the BayesR, BayesRC, and GBLUP methods.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The accuracy of genomic prediction for heat tolerance improved by up to 0.07, 0.05, and 0.10 units in Holstein, Jersey, and crossbred cows, respectively, when sets of selected sequence markers from Holstein cows were added to the 50k SNP panel. However, in some scenarios, the prediction accuracy decreased unexpectedly with the largest drop of - 0.10 units for the heat tolerance fat yield trait observed in Jersey cows when 50k plus pre-selected SNPs from Holstein cows were used. Using pre-selected SNPs discovered on a combined set of Holstein and Jersey cows generally improved the accuracy, especially in the Jersey validation. In addition, combining Holstein and Jersey bulls in the reference set generally improved prediction accuracy in most scenarios compared to using only Holstein bulls as the reference set.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Informative sequence markers can be prioritised to improve the genomic prediction of heat tolerance in different breeds. In addition to providing biological insight, these variants could also have a direct application for developing customized SNP arrays or can be used via imputation in current industry SNP panels.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35183109
doi: 10.1186/s12711-022-00708-8
pii: 10.1186/s12711-022-00708-8
pmc: PMC8858496
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
17Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
PLoS Genet. 2014 Mar 27;10(3):e1004198
pubmed: 24675618
Genet Sel Evol. 2018 May 18;50(1):27
pubmed: 29776327
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Nov;100(11):8645-8657
pubmed: 28918147
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Mar;103(3):2460-2476
pubmed: 31864748
J Dairy Sci. 2003 Nov;86(11):3736-44
pubmed: 14672205
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Apr;99(4):2849-2862
pubmed: 27037467
J Dairy Sci. 2015 Jun;98(6):4107-16
pubmed: 25892697
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 17;11(1):16619
pubmed: 34404823
Commun Biol. 2020 Feb 28;3(1):88
pubmed: 32111961
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Aug 5;100(16):9440-5
pubmed: 12883005
BMC Genomics. 2017 Aug 15;18(1):618
pubmed: 28810831
BMC Genomics. 2016 Feb 27;17:144
pubmed: 26920147
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Jul;95(7):4114-29
pubmed: 22720968
Nat Genet. 2012 Jul 22;44(8):955-9
pubmed: 22820512
Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2019 Feb 15;7:89-102
pubmed: 30508490
Genet Sel Evol. 2017 Sep 18;49(1):68
pubmed: 28923017
Front Genet. 2020 Dec 14;11:598580
pubmed: 33381150
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Oct;99(10):8146-8167
pubmed: 27522425
G3 (Bethesda). 2016 Aug 09;6(8):2553-61
pubmed: 27317779
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Sep;100(9):7362-7367
pubmed: 28711268
Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Jun 26;51(1):32
pubmed: 31242855
J Dairy Sci. 2000 Sep;83(9):2120-5
pubmed: 11003246
Front Genet. 2019 Oct 04;10:928
pubmed: 31636656
Am J Hum Genet. 2011 Jan 7;88(1):76-82
pubmed: 21167468
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Aug;102(8):7237-7247
pubmed: 31155255
J Anim Breed Genet. 2016 Jun;133(3):167-79
pubmed: 26776363
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 29;6:34114
pubmed: 27682591
Genetics. 2003 Dec;165(4):2259-68
pubmed: 14704201
G3 (Bethesda). 2020 Feb 6;10(2):783-795
pubmed: 31857332
Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Dec 31;41:55
pubmed: 20043827
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75
pubmed: 17701901
Genet Sel Evol. 2019 Dec 5;51(1):72
pubmed: 31805849
J Anim Breed Genet. 2006 Aug;123(4):218-23
pubmed: 16882088
Genet Sel Evol. 2020 Sep 29;52(1):54
pubmed: 32993481
Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Dec 1;48(1):95
pubmed: 27905878
Genet Sel Evol. 2016 Jun 29;48(1):49
pubmed: 27357580
Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 8;12(1):860
pubmed: 33558518
BMC Genomics. 2014 Jan 24;15:62
pubmed: 24456127
Genet Sel Evol. 2018 Nov 6;50(1):53
pubmed: 30400768
Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Nov 24;41:51
pubmed: 19930712
J Anim Sci. 2017 Apr;95(4):1813-1826
pubmed: 28464073
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Apr 17;47:29
pubmed: 25887988