What happens at the L5/S1 facet joint when implants are placed across the sacroiliac joint?

Adjacent joint stress Adjacent segment disease Facet Implant placement Implant removal SI joint Sacroiliac joint fixation

Journal

Injury
ISSN: 1879-0267
Titre abrégé: Injury
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0226040

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Historique:
received: 27 12 2021
revised: 28 01 2022
accepted: 03 02 2022
pubmed: 21 2 2022
medline: 7 6 2022
entrez: 20 2 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Injuries to the posterior pelvic ring are often stabilized with fixation across the sacroiliac joint (SIJ). However, the compensatory changes at the neighboring L5/S1 facet joint are unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the compensatory change in pelvic kinematics and contact forces at the L5/S1 facet joint after fixation across the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) using a cadaveric model. Five fresh-frozen cadaveric pelvis specimens were dissected to remove non-structural soft tissue. Retroreflective markers were fixed to the L5 body, S1 body and bilateral anterior superior iliac spines to represent the motion of L5, S1 and the ileum, respectively. Pressure sensors were inserted in both L5/S1 facet joints. Testing was performed using a robotic system that applied load to mimic ambulation. Testing was performed prior to SIJ fixation, after unilateral SIJ fixation and bilateral fixation. Contact force at the L5/S1 facet joint significantly increased by 55% from 48.4 N to 75.2 N following unilateral fixation (p = 0.0161) and increased by 100% to 96.9 N after bilateral fixation (p = 0.0038). Unilateral SIJ fixation increased flexion of the ilium relative to L5 from 1.2° to 2.0° (p = 0.01) and increased axial rotation of L5 relative to S1 from 0.7° to 1.6° (p = 0.001). Bilateral fixation increased flexion of the ilium relative to L5 to 2.0° from 1.2° prior to fixation (p = 0.001), increased axial rotation of L5 relative to S1 to 1.2° from 0.7° prior to fixation (p = 0.002) and increased flexion of L5 relative to S1 to 2.4° from 1.5° prior to fixation (p = 0.04). The L5/S1 facet joint experiences compensatory increased motion under increased contact force after unilateral and bilateral SIJ fixation, possibly predisposing it to adjacent segment arthritis. V, cadaveric study.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Injuries to the posterior pelvic ring are often stabilized with fixation across the sacroiliac joint (SIJ). However, the compensatory changes at the neighboring L5/S1 facet joint are unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the compensatory change in pelvic kinematics and contact forces at the L5/S1 facet joint after fixation across the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) using a cadaveric model.
METHODS METHODS
Five fresh-frozen cadaveric pelvis specimens were dissected to remove non-structural soft tissue. Retroreflective markers were fixed to the L5 body, S1 body and bilateral anterior superior iliac spines to represent the motion of L5, S1 and the ileum, respectively. Pressure sensors were inserted in both L5/S1 facet joints. Testing was performed using a robotic system that applied load to mimic ambulation. Testing was performed prior to SIJ fixation, after unilateral SIJ fixation and bilateral fixation.
RESULTS RESULTS
Contact force at the L5/S1 facet joint significantly increased by 55% from 48.4 N to 75.2 N following unilateral fixation (p = 0.0161) and increased by 100% to 96.9 N after bilateral fixation (p = 0.0038). Unilateral SIJ fixation increased flexion of the ilium relative to L5 from 1.2° to 2.0° (p = 0.01) and increased axial rotation of L5 relative to S1 from 0.7° to 1.6° (p = 0.001). Bilateral fixation increased flexion of the ilium relative to L5 to 2.0° from 1.2° prior to fixation (p = 0.001), increased axial rotation of L5 relative to S1 to 1.2° from 0.7° prior to fixation (p = 0.002) and increased flexion of L5 relative to S1 to 2.4° from 1.5° prior to fixation (p = 0.04).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The L5/S1 facet joint experiences compensatory increased motion under increased contact force after unilateral and bilateral SIJ fixation, possibly predisposing it to adjacent segment arthritis.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE METHODS
V, cadaveric study.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35183344
pii: S0020-1383(22)00107-3
doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.02.011
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2121-2125

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Corey J Schiffman (CJ)

University of Washington Department of Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States. Electronic address: cjschif@uw.edu.

Scott Telfer (S)

University of Washington Department of Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States. Electronic address: telfers@uw.edu.

Erik A Magnusson (EA)

University of Washington Department of Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States. Electronic address: emagnus@uw.edu.

Reza Firoozabadi (R)

University of Washington Department of Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States. Electronic address: rezaf2@uw.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH