Patient-reported health-related quality of life from a randomized phase II trial comparing standard-dose with high-dose twice daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited stage small-cell lung cancer.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
Cisplatin
/ therapeutic use
Convalescence
Deglutition Disorders
/ epidemiology
Dose Fractionation, Radiation
Dyspnea
Etoposide
Humans
Lung Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Neoplasm Staging
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Quality of Life
Radiotherapy
/ adverse effects
Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
/ drug therapy
Chemoradiotherapy
Health related quality of life
Hyper fractionated
LS SCLC
Patient reported outcomes
Twice daily thoracic radiotherapy
Journal
Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
ISSN: 1872-8332
Titre abrégé: Lung Cancer
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 8800805
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
received:
03
01
2022
revised:
03
02
2022
accepted:
06
02
2022
pubmed:
21
2
2022
medline:
27
4
2022
entrez:
20
2
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In a randomized phase II trial, twice daily (BID) thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) of 60 Gy/40 fractions improved survival compared with 45 Gy/30 fractions in limited stage small-cell lung cancer (LS SCLC). Notably, the higher dose did not cause more toxicity. Here we present health related quality of life (HRQoL) reported by the trial participants during the first 2 years. 170 patients were randomized 1:1 to TRT of 45 Gy or 60 Gy concurrently with cisplatin/etoposide chemotherapy. The 150 patients who commenced TRT and completed a minimum of one HRQoL-questionnaire were included in the present study. Patients reported HRQoL on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core 30 and Lung Cancer 13 Quality of Life Questionnaires. Questionnaires were completed weeks 0, 4 (before TRT), 8 (end of TRT), 12 (response evaluation after chemoradiotherapy) and 16 (end of prophylactic cranial irradiation), then every 10 weeks year one, and every 3 months year two. Primary HRQoL endpoints were dysphagia and dyspnea. A difference in mean score of ≥10 was defined as clinically significant. Maximum dysphagia was reported on week 8, with no significant difference between treatment arms (mean scores 45 Gy: 44.2, 60 Gy: 51.1). The 60 Gy arm had more dysphagia in the convalescence period, but dysphagia scores returned to baseline levels at week 16 in both arms. For dyspnea there were no significant changes, or differences between treatment arms, at any timepoint. There were no significant differences between treatment arms for any other HRQoL-scales. TRT of 60 Gy did not cause significantly higher maximum dysphagia, though patients on the 60 Gy arm reported more dysphagia the first 8 weeks of convalescence. The higher dose was well tolerated and is an attractive alternative to current TRT schedules in LS SCLC. Trial reg Clinicaltrials.gov NCT0204184.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35183991
pii: S0169-5002(22)00042-3
doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2022.02.002
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Etoposide
6PLQ3CP4P3
Cisplatin
Q20Q21Q62J
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02041845']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
49-57Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.