Pharmacological management of fibromyalgia: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.


Journal

Expert review of clinical pharmacology
ISSN: 1751-2441
Titre abrégé: Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101278296

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 22 2 2022
medline: 1 4 2022
entrez: 21 2 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The identification of the most effective therapy for patients with fibromyalgia (FM) remains controversial. Thus, we conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis to compare several drugs employed as pharmacological management for FM. The following databases were accessed in October 2021: PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Scopus. All the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compare two or more pharmacological management for fibromyalgia were accessed. Only studies involving a minimum of 10 patients with a length of follow-up longer than 4 weeks were included. The data from the fibromyalgia impact questionnaire (FIQ) and the physical and mental subscales short form 36 (SF36) were extracted at last follow-up. Additionally, the number of adverse events leading to the study of discontinuation was extracted. The compounds of interests were duloxetine, pregabalin, fluoxetine, gabapentin, milnacipran, trazodone, placebo, nortriptyline, IGF-I, amitriptyline, and the combination of fluoxetine and amitriptyline, pregabalin, and trazodone. According to published evidence, pregabalin, and duloxetine evidenced the greatest improvement of the FIQ and SF36 Physical and Mental subscales, along with the lowest rate of adverse events leading to study discontinuation. The results must be interpreted in light of possible adverse events associated with the use of these drugs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35184627
doi: 10.1080/17512433.2022.2044792
doi:

Substances chimiques

Analgesics 0
Pregabalin 55JG375S6M
Gabapentin 6CW7F3G59X
Duloxetine Hydrochloride 9044SC542W

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

205-214

Auteurs

Filippo Migliorini (F)

Department of Orthopedics, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Aachen, Germany.

Nicola Maffulli (N)

Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Baronissi (SA), Italy.
School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University School of Medicine, Staffordshire, UK.
Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Jörg Eschweiler (J)

Department of Orthopedics, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Aachen, Germany.

Matthias Knobe (M)

Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Markus Tingart (M)

Department of Orthopedics, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Aachen, Germany.

Giorgia Colarossi (G)

Department of Orthopedics, RWTH Aachen University Clinic, Aachen, Germany.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH