Australians' Experience of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Advantages and Challenges of Scaling Up Qualitative Research Using Large-Scale Rapid Analysis and Building Research Capacity Across Rural Australia.

pandemic large-scale analysis qualitative evaluation qualitative methods rural health

Journal

International journal of qualitative methods
ISSN: 1609-4069
Titre abrégé: Int J Qual Methods
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101213922

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2021
Historique:
entrez: 21 2 2022
pubmed: 22 2 2022
medline: 22 2 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Australia responded to the emergence of the COVID-19 global pandemic in 2020 by initiating a border and bio-security zone lockdown and policies emphasising social distancing and hand hygiene. To understand the public response to this, Southern Queensland Rural Health commenced a two-phase research project exploring attitudes and practices towards the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. An initial online survey foreshadowed 90 qualitative interviews with respondents to explore what the pandemic meant for everyday life. This paper details use of a qualitative approach by a national collaborative of investigators from 9 rural university departments in Australia who came together to research the qualitative phase of the project. Our methodological approach aligned with extant literature describing the management of large-scale interviewing and coding in the context of unfolding and dynamic contexts. The 'RITA' model (Rapid Identification of Themes from Audio recordings) entails a five-step process designed to progress from identifying research foci, through deductive and iterative coding to identify key concepts. We used a combination of coding templates, organisation and tagging of field notes and real-time sharing through a secure cloud drive to create a data set for immersive analysis and generation of ideas. Use of this method has added to the collective knowledge about successful rapid research investigations, recognising the inherent tension between speed and rigour. This is not a binary but a dialectic; trustworthiness is integral to qualitative research. However, use of fresh approaches is accommodated by new technologies and can preserve adequate rigour while enabling collaboration, research capacity building and increasing the pace of data collection and analysis. This project has presented methodological challenges and highlights some strengths of such an approach. It is hoped that reporting our approach and experiences is useful for the broader health and research community considering large-scale qualitative research.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35185444
doi: 10.1177/16094069211051937
pii: 10.1177_16094069211051937
pmc: PMC8841395
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

16094069211051937

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Références

Nordisk Alkohol Nark. 2011 Dec 21;28(5-6):433-452
pubmed: 22308079
Qual Health Res. 2020 Dec;30(14):2192-2204
pubmed: 32865149

Auteurs

Floraidh Rolf (F)

Southern Queensland Rural Health, The University of Queensland, Charleville, QLD, Australia.
School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia.

Narelle Campbell (N)

Rural and Remote Health, Flinders University, Darwin, NT, Australia.

Sandra Thompson (S)

Western Australia Centre for Rural Health, University of WesternAustralia, Geraldton, WA, Australia.

Geoff Argus (G)

Southern Queensland Rural Health, The University of Queensland, Charleville, QLD, Australia.
School of Psychology and Counselling, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia.

Classifications MeSH