Evaluation of Two Rapid Lateral Flow Tests and Two Surrogate ELISAs for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Specific Neutralizing Antibodies.
COVID-19
ELISA
SARS-CoV-2
lateral flow assay
neutralizing antibodies
Journal
Frontiers in medicine
ISSN: 2296-858X
Titre abrégé: Front Med (Lausanne)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101648047
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
22
11
2021
accepted:
03
01
2022
entrez:
21
2
2022
pubmed:
22
2
2022
medline:
22
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
As vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 progresses rapidly around the world, reliable detection of SARS-CoV-2 specific neutralizing antibodies (NAb) has become an indispensable component of serological diagnostics. We evaluated the performance of four commercially available tests, i.e. two lateral flow assays (Coris BioConcept COVID-19 Sero NP/RBD and Concile InfectCheck COVID-19 NAb) and two surrogate ELISA (sELISA) tests (EUROIMMUN SARS-CoV-2 NeutraLISA and AdipoGen SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibodies Detection Kit) in comparison with an in-house SARS-CoV-2 micro neutralization test as reference. A total of 334 sera were tested, including 30 samples collected prior to the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, 128 sera from convalescent patients as well as 176 sera from partially or fully vaccinated individuals. The overall sensitivity of LFAs differed and was 71.6% for the Coris and 98.4% for the Concile. In contrast, overall sensitivity of the NeutraLISA was 86 and 98% for the AdipoGen. All test showed the highest sensitivity when testing samples from fully vaccinated individuals with both sELISA achieving 100% sensitivity. Overall specificity was 89.3% for the Coris and only 58.3% for the Concile. Similarly, significant differences were observed for both sELISA, with an overall specificity of 82.1% for the NeutraLISA and only 54.8% for the AdipoGen. All tests showed a 100% specificity when testing negative control samples while specificities were lowest when testing samples from only partially vaccinated individuals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35187003
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.820151
pmc: PMC8854747
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
820151Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Girl, Zwirglmaier, von Buttlar, Wölfel and Müller.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Lancet. 2021 Jun 19;397(10292):2331-2333
pubmed: 34090624
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 May 25;11(6):
pubmed: 34070341
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Jun 30;8(7):ofab353
pubmed: 34337100
Nat Med. 2021 Jul;27(7):1147-1148
pubmed: 34239135
Nat Rev Immunol. 2020 Dec;20(12):727-738
pubmed: 33139888
Nat Med. 2021 Jul;27(7):1205-1211
pubmed: 34002089
Nat Commun. 2021 Apr 9;12(1):2117
pubmed: 33837204
Nature. 2020 Dec;588(7839):682-687
pubmed: 33045718
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615
pubmed: 33301246
Biosaf Health. 2020 Dec;2(4):226-231
pubmed: 32864605
J Med Virol. 2021 Apr;93(4):2301-2306
pubmed: 33236799
J Med Virol. 2022 Jan;94(1):35-38
pubmed: 34516026
Nat Commun. 2020 Jul 6;11(1):3436
pubmed: 32632160
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Dec;20(12):1390-1400
pubmed: 32979318
Nat Med. 2021 Nov;27(11):2002-2011
pubmed: 34594036
J Virol Methods. 2021 Jun;292:114122
pubmed: 33705832
J Clin Med. 2021 May 14;10(10):
pubmed: 34069088
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Aug 13;70(32):1081-1083
pubmed: 34383732
J Gen Virol. 2021 Oct;102(10):
pubmed: 34623233
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Aug 27;58(12):2121-2130
pubmed: 32853163
Nat Commun. 2021 Jul 29;12(1):4617
pubmed: 34326317
N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 7;385(15):1393-1400
pubmed: 34525275
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Nov;9(11):e1517-e1527
pubmed: 34678196
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Dec;9(1):680-686
pubmed: 32207377
Lancet. 2021 Oct 9;398(10308):1377-1380
pubmed: 34534516
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 20;384(20):1959-1961
pubmed: 33755375
Cell. 2020 Aug 20;182(4):828-842.e16
pubmed: 32645326
Cell. 2020 Nov 12;183(4):1024-1042.e21
pubmed: 32991844