A Semi-quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire Has Relative Validity to Identify Groups of NOVA Food Classification System Among Mexican Adults.

24 h dietary recall NOVA food classification system adult population food frequency questionnaire relative validity

Journal

Frontiers in nutrition
ISSN: 2296-861X
Titre abrégé: Front Nutr
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101642264

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 06 07 2021
accepted: 05 01 2022
entrez: 21 2 2022
pubmed: 22 2 2022
medline: 22 2 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Ultra-processed foods are recognized as indicators of an unhealthy diet in epidemiological studies. In addition to ultra-processed foods, the NOVA food classification system identifies three other groups with less processing. Unprocessed foods that, together with minimally processed foods (MPF), make NOVA group 1, NOVA group 2 is processed culinary ingredients, and NOVA group 3 is processed foods. To assess the relative validity of the semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (SFFQ) to estimate the energy intake for each group NOVA classification system by comparing it with two 24 h-dietary-recall (24DRs) Mexican adults. We analyzed dietary information from 226 adults included <60 and ≥60 years with complete SFFQ and two 24DRs from the National Health and Nutrition Survey 2012. We reported mean differences, Spearman correlation coefficients, intra-class correlations coefficients, Bland-Altman plots, and weighted kappa between measures. The percentage energy intake from unprocessed and minimally processed foods group, Spearman correlation coefficients was 0.54 in adults <60 years and 0.42 in adults ≥60 years, while ultra-processed foods group was 0.67 and 0.48, respectively. The intra-class correlation coefficients in the unprocessed and minimally processed foods group was 0.51 in adults <60 years and 0.46 in adults ≥60 years, and for the ultra-processed foods group were 0.71 and 0.50, respectively. Bland-Altman plots indicated reasonably consistent agreement for unprocessed and minimally processed foods group and ultra-processed foods group in adults <60 years and adults in the ≥60 age group. Weighted kappa was 0.45 in the ultra-processed foods group to adults <60 years and was 0.36-≥60 years. The SFFQ had acceptable validity to rank the percentage of energy intake from unprocessed and minimally processed foods group and ultra-processed foods group in Mexican adults, both in adults under 60 years and who were 60 years old or older.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Ultra-processed foods are recognized as indicators of an unhealthy diet in epidemiological studies. In addition to ultra-processed foods, the NOVA food classification system identifies three other groups with less processing. Unprocessed foods that, together with minimally processed foods (MPF), make NOVA group 1, NOVA group 2 is processed culinary ingredients, and NOVA group 3 is processed foods.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To assess the relative validity of the semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (SFFQ) to estimate the energy intake for each group NOVA classification system by comparing it with two 24 h-dietary-recall (24DRs) Mexican adults.
METHODS METHODS
We analyzed dietary information from 226 adults included <60 and ≥60 years with complete SFFQ and two 24DRs from the National Health and Nutrition Survey 2012. We reported mean differences, Spearman correlation coefficients, intra-class correlations coefficients, Bland-Altman plots, and weighted kappa between measures.
RESULTS RESULTS
The percentage energy intake from unprocessed and minimally processed foods group, Spearman correlation coefficients was 0.54 in adults <60 years and 0.42 in adults ≥60 years, while ultra-processed foods group was 0.67 and 0.48, respectively. The intra-class correlation coefficients in the unprocessed and minimally processed foods group was 0.51 in adults <60 years and 0.46 in adults ≥60 years, and for the ultra-processed foods group were 0.71 and 0.50, respectively. Bland-Altman plots indicated reasonably consistent agreement for unprocessed and minimally processed foods group and ultra-processed foods group in adults <60 years and adults in the ≥60 age group. Weighted kappa was 0.45 in the ultra-processed foods group to adults <60 years and was 0.36-≥60 years.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The SFFQ had acceptable validity to rank the percentage of energy intake from unprocessed and minimally processed foods group and ultra-processed foods group in Mexican adults, both in adults under 60 years and who were 60 years old or older.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35187027
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.737432
pmc: PMC8850985
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

737432

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Oviedo-Solís, Monterrubio-Flores, Rodríguez-Ramírez, Cediel, Denova-Gutiérrez and Barquera.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Salud Publica Mex. 2016 Nov-Dec;58(6):617-628
pubmed: 28225938
Cell Metab. 2019 Jul 2;30(1):67-77.e3
pubmed: 31105044
Nutr Hosp. 2018 Feb 16;35(2):408-415
pubmed: 29756976
Appetite. 2017 Jan 1;108:512-520
pubmed: 27825941
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Nov 9;:
pubmed: 34763139
Nutrients. 2018 May 09;10(5):
pubmed: 29747447
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Nov;119(11):1852-1865
pubmed: 31262695
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
pubmed: 843571
Obes Rev. 2021 Mar;22(3):e13146
pubmed: 33167080
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2002 May;56 Suppl 2:S25-32
pubmed: 12082515
Public Health Nutr. 2019 Apr;22(5):936-941
pubmed: 30744710
Salud Publica Mex. 2009;51 Suppl 4:S645-56
pubmed: 20464241
Salud Publica Mex. 2009;51 Suppl 4:S523-9
pubmed: 20464228
Salud Publica Mex. 1998 Mar-Apr;40(2):133-40
pubmed: 9617194
Nutrients. 2020 Jun 30;12(7):
pubmed: 32630022
Public Health Nutr. 2011 Jan;14(1):5-13
pubmed: 21211100
J Nutr. 2016 Sep;146(9):1856S-65S
pubmed: 27511932
Salud Publica Mex. 2016 Nov-Dec;58(6):608-616
pubmed: 28225937
Public Health Nutr. 2013 Dec;16(12):2240-8
pubmed: 23171687
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Jan;21(1):125-133
pubmed: 28625223
Salud Publica Mex. 2017 May-Jun;59(3):285-298
pubmed: 28902316
Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49:38
pubmed: 26176747
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2020 Sep;71(6):678-692
pubmed: 32053758
Salud Publica Mex. 2020 Sep-Oct;62(5):521-531
pubmed: 33027862
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009 Feb;63 Suppl 1:S69-74
pubmed: 19190649
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2015 Feb;28(1):37-46
pubmed: 24527882
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009 Feb;63 Suppl 1:S33-7
pubmed: 19190641
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Jan;21(1):94-102
pubmed: 28714425
Salud Publica Mex. 2013;55 Suppl 2:S332-40
pubmed: 24626712
Rev Saude Publica. 2015;49:45
pubmed: 26270019
Salud Publica Mex. 2016 Nov-Dec;58(6):629-638
pubmed: 28225939
J Am Diet Assoc. 2005 May;105(5):775-89
pubmed: 15883556
Popul Health Metr. 2017 Feb 14;15(1):6
pubmed: 28193285
Nutrients. 2019 Jun 07;11(6):
pubmed: 31181631
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Jan;21(1):27-37
pubmed: 28703085
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Aug;24(11):3399-3418
pubmed: 32772982
Salud Publica Mex. 2016 Nov-Dec;58(6):602-605
pubmed: 28225935

Auteurs

Cecilia Isabel Oviedo-Solís (CI)

Center for Nutrition and Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.

Eric A Monterrubio-Flores (EA)

Center for Nutrition and Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.

Sonia Rodríguez-Ramírez (S)

Center for Nutrition and Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.

Gustavo Cediel (G)

School of Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.

Edgar Denova-Gutiérrez (E)

Center for Nutrition and Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.

Simón Barquera (S)

Center for Nutrition and Health Research, National Institute of Public Health, Cuernavaca, Mexico.

Classifications MeSH