HandyRef-K: Comparison of the Latest Handheld Auto Refracto-keratometer with Retinomax and Plusoptix in Patients Younger than Three Years of Age.

Amblyopia HandyRef Plusoptix Retinomax refractometer retinoscopy

Journal

Beyoglu eye journal
ISSN: 2587-0394
Titre abrégé: Beyoglu Eye J
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101777848

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 27 08 2018
accepted: 28 12 2018
entrez: 21 2 2022
pubmed: 26 2 2019
medline: 26 2 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The purpose of the study was to compare the refractive error measurements of pediatric patients performed with a Plusoptix A09 photorefractor (PO; Plusoptix AG, Nuremberg, Germany), a Retinomax K-plus 3 (RTX; Right Group, Tokyo, Japan), and the new handheld auto refracto-keratometer, the Nidek HandyRef-K (HDY; Nidek SA, Créteil, France), and to evaluate the intermethods agreement. A total of 194 eyes of 194 children were included in the study. All of the children underwent refraction measurement with the PO before cycloplegia and 2 autorefractors were used after cycloplegia: the RTX and the HDY. The mean age of the patients was 16.65±10.04 months (range: 3-34 months). There were no statistically significant differences between the spherical values (SV) or cylindrical axis values (CAV) measured with the PO (SV: 1.61±1.79 diopters [D]; CAV: 94.25±72.47 D), the RTX (SV: 1.91±2.06 D; CAV: 94.3±73.44 D), and the HDY (SV: 1.89±2.04 D; CAV: 93.55±73.71 D) (p>0.05).There was a statistically significant difference in the cylindrical values (CV) assessed with the RTX (CV: -0.97±0.75 D) and the HDY (CV: -1.11±0.76 D) (p=0.003) and the HDY and the PO (CV: -0.92±0.68 D)(p=0.002), while there was no statistically significant difference between the values determined with the RTX and the PO (p>0.05). Statistically significant differences were demonstrated for spherical equivalent values (SEV) obtained with the RTX (SEV: 1.43±1.97 D) and the PO (SEV: 1.15±1.74 D) (p=0.02), and the HDY (SEV: 1.34±1.95 D) and the PO (p=0.03), but no significant difference was found between the RTX and the HDY values (p>0.05). No significant difference was found between the SEV measured by the RTX and the HDY, but the PO was significantly less hyperopic than the RTX and the HDY. The CV measured by HDY was higher than that of other devices. These devices can be used for screening in crowded pediatric ophthalmology clinics and may be an easier way of measuring refractive errors in children younger than 3 years of age, but high SEV and CV results should serve as an alert to physicians. It should also be kept in mind that cycloplegic retinoscopy is still the gold standard and these alternative methods can only be used for screening. The prescription of eyeglasses should not be made without cycloplegic retinoscopy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35187429
doi: 10.14744/bej.2018.20591
pii: BEJ-4-32
pmc: PMC8842038
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

32-37

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2019 by Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Références

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005 Jul;243(7):637-45
pubmed: 15650858
Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Jan;96(1):83-6
pubmed: 21515564
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Dec 28;52(13):9658-64
pubmed: 22125281
Int J Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb 18;8(1):128-31
pubmed: 25709922
J AAPOS. 2014 Aug;18(4):327-31
pubmed: 25173893
Br J Ophthalmol. 1997 Nov;81(11):941-8
pubmed: 9505815
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2015 Jan-Feb;52(1):37-42
pubmed: 25643369
Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Dec;82(12):1066-70
pubmed: 16357649
Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3:429-31
pubmed: 19684866
BMC Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun 01;16:72
pubmed: 27246869
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1998 Mar-Apr;35(2):107-9
pubmed: 9559510
Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Dec;136(6):1120-8
pubmed: 14644224
Korean J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jun;29(3):178-84
pubmed: 26028946
J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2012 Jan;7(1):3-9
pubmed: 22737380
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2009 Jul;29(4):422-6
pubmed: 19523087
J AAPOS. 2017 Aug;21(4):262.e1-262.e5
pubmed: 28716735
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Apr;41(5):1031-7
pubmed: 10752938
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2012 Nov-Dec;49(6):370-7
pubmed: 22938517

Auteurs

Zeynep Seymen (Z)

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences Istanbul Suleymaniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Esra Vural (E)

Department of Ophthalmology, Mardin State Hospital, Mardin, Turkey.

Erdem Eris (E)

University of Health Sciences Prof. Dr. N. Resat Belger Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Asli Vural (A)

Department of Ophthalmology, Bakırkoy Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Tulin Ogreden (T)

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences Istanbul Suleymaniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Onder Aslan (O)

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences Istanbul Suleymaniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Ali Riza Cenk Celebi (ARC)

Department of Ophthalmology, Acıbadem University Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Irfan Perente (I)

University of Health Sciences Prof. Dr. N. Resat Belger Beyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Classifications MeSH