Comparison of a Novel Anatomic Technique and the Docking Technique for Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction.


Journal

The American journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 1552-3365
Titre abrégé: Am J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7609541

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 22 2 2022
medline: 6 4 2022
entrez: 21 2 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Current reconstruction techniques do not re-create the distal ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) insertion. Reconstructing the distal extension of the anterior band ulnar footprint may increase elbow stability and resistance against valgus stress after UCL reconstruction (UCLR). The purpose was to test a new technique for UCLR, a modification of the docking technique, aimed at re-creating the distal ulnar footprint anatomy of the anterior band. We hypothesize that this novel "anatomic" technique will provide greater resistance to valgus stress after UCLR when compared with the docking technique. Descriptive laboratory study. Eighteen unpaired cadaveric arms were dissected to capsuloligamentous elbow structures and potted. With use of a servohydraulic load frame, 5 Nċm of valgus stress was placed on the UCL-intact elbows at 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of flexion. UCLR was performed on each elbow, randomized to either the docking technique or the anatomic technique. After UCLR, the elbow was again tested at 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of flexion. Ulnohumeral joint gapping was calculated using a 3-dimensional motion capture system applied to markers attached to the ulna and humerus. Differences in gapping among the intact state and docking and anatomic techniques were compared using a 2-way analysis of variance with significance set to There was no significant difference in gapping between the anatomic and docking technique groups regardless of elbow flexion angle. All reconstructed groups showed increased gapping relative to intact, but all increases were below the clinically relevant level of 1 mm. Ulnohumeral joint gapping and resistance to valgus stress were similar between the anatomic technique and the docking technique for UCLR. This study provides evidence that the anatomic technique is a viable alternative UCLR method as compared with the docking technique in a cadaveric model.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Current reconstruction techniques do not re-create the distal ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) insertion. Reconstructing the distal extension of the anterior band ulnar footprint may increase elbow stability and resistance against valgus stress after UCL reconstruction (UCLR).
PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS
The purpose was to test a new technique for UCLR, a modification of the docking technique, aimed at re-creating the distal ulnar footprint anatomy of the anterior band. We hypothesize that this novel "anatomic" technique will provide greater resistance to valgus stress after UCLR when compared with the docking technique.
STUDY DESIGN
Descriptive laboratory study.
METHODS
Eighteen unpaired cadaveric arms were dissected to capsuloligamentous elbow structures and potted. With use of a servohydraulic load frame, 5 Nċm of valgus stress was placed on the UCL-intact elbows at 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of flexion. UCLR was performed on each elbow, randomized to either the docking technique or the anatomic technique. After UCLR, the elbow was again tested at 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of flexion. Ulnohumeral joint gapping was calculated using a 3-dimensional motion capture system applied to markers attached to the ulna and humerus. Differences in gapping among the intact state and docking and anatomic techniques were compared using a 2-way analysis of variance with significance set to
RESULTS
There was no significant difference in gapping between the anatomic and docking technique groups regardless of elbow flexion angle. All reconstructed groups showed increased gapping relative to intact, but all increases were below the clinically relevant level of 1 mm.
CONCLUSION
Ulnohumeral joint gapping and resistance to valgus stress were similar between the anatomic technique and the docking technique for UCLR.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
This study provides evidence that the anatomic technique is a viable alternative UCLR method as compared with the docking technique in a cadaveric model.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35188812
doi: 10.1177/03635465221076149
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1061-1065

Auteurs

Kathleen N Meyers (KN)

Department of Biomechanics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.

Kellie K Middleton (KK)

Sports Medicine, Northside Hospital Orthopedic Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Michael C Fu (MC)

Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.

Joshua S Dines (JS)

Sports Medicine Institute, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH