Long-term outcomes after ascending aortic replacement and aortic root replacement for type A aortic dissection.
Aortic dissection
Aortic root replacement
Ascending aortic replacement
Bentall procedure
Supracoronary
Type A aortic dissection
Journal
Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery
ISSN: 1569-9285
Titre abrégé: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101158399
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 02 2022
21 02 2022
Historique:
received:
15
05
2021
revised:
11
08
2021
accepted:
26
09
2021
entrez:
21
2
2022
pubmed:
22
2
2022
medline:
8
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We investigated whether the selective use of supracoronary ascending aorta replacement achieves late outcomes comparable to those of aortic root replacement for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD). Patients who underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection from 2005 to 2018 at the Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, were included in this analysis. Late mortality was evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier method and proximal aortic reoperation, i.e. operation on the aortic root or aortic valve, with the competing risk method. Out of 309 patients, 216 underwent supracoronary ascending aortic replacement and 93 had aortic root replacement. At 10 years, mortality was 33.8% after aortic root replacement and 35.2% after ascending aortic replacement (P = 0.806, adjusted hazard ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval, 0.77-2.02), and the cumulative incidence of proximal aortic reoperation was 6.0% in the aortic root replacement group and 6.2% in the ascending aortic replacement group (P = 0.65; adjusted subdistributional hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.15-1.89). Among 71 propensity score matched pairs, 10-year survival was 34.4% after aortic root replacement and 36.2% after ascending aortic replacement surgery (P = 0.70). Cumulative incidence of proximal aortic reoperation was 7.0% after aortic root replacement and 13.0% after ascending aortic replacement surgery (P = 0.22). Among 102 patients with complete imaging data [mean follow-up, 4.7 (3.2) years], the estimated growth rate of the aortic root diameter was 0.22 mm/year, that of its area 7.19 mm2/year and that of its perimeter 0.43 mm/year. When stringent selection criteria were used to determine the extent of proximal aortic reconstruction, aortic root replacement and ascending aortic replacement for type A aortic dissection achieved comparable clinical outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35188959
pii: 6433092
doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab324
pmc: PMC8860427
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
453-461Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.
Références
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Jul;110(1):136-143
pubmed: 31783019
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Apr;101(4):1464-9
pubmed: 26627176
J Card Surg. 2018 Jan;33(1):7-18
pubmed: 29314257
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019 Nov 1;29(5):766-775
pubmed: 31365078
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Feb;159(2):392-399.e1
pubmed: 30928219
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Aug;84(2):479-86; discussion 486-7
pubmed: 17643619
Ann Thorac Surg. 1999 Jun;67(6):2006-9; discussion 2014-9
pubmed: 10391359
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Oct 1;58(4):700-706
pubmed: 32492120
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Apr;41(4):734-44; discussion 744-5
pubmed: 22378855
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Feb;161(2):483-493.e1
pubmed: 31839222
J Thorac Imaging. 2020 Nov 1;35(6):399-406
pubmed: 32251236
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Dec;84(6):1955-64; discussion 1955-64
pubmed: 18036916
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Sep;51(9):747-54
pubmed: 9731923
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Dec;98(6):2078-84
pubmed: 25282163
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Mar 1;24(3):450-459
pubmed: 28040765
Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Mar;73(3):707-13
pubmed: 11899170
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Aug;50(2):232-9
pubmed: 26916934
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 4;14(1):e0210022
pubmed: 30608954
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Sep;156(3):939-948
pubmed: 29753501