Explicit vs. implicit spatial processing in arrow vs. eye-gaze spatial congruency effects.

Arrows Attentional orienting Gaze Implicit processing Reversed congruency effect Social attention Spatial interference task

Journal

Psychological research
ISSN: 1430-2772
Titre abrégé: Psychol Res
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0435062

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Historique:
received: 14 10 2021
accepted: 31 01 2022
pubmed: 23 2 2022
medline: 27 1 2023
entrez: 22 2 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Arrows and gaze stimuli lead to opposite spatial congruency effects. While standard congruency effects are observed for arrows (faster responses for congruent conditions), responses are faster when eye-gaze stimuli are presented on the opposite side of the gazed-at location (incongruent trials), leading to a reversed congruency effect (RCE). Here, we explored the effects of implicit vs. explicit processing of arrows and eye-gaze direction. Participants were required to identify the direction (explicit task) or the colour (implicit task) of left or right looking/pointing gaze or arrows, presented to either the left or right of the fixation point. When participants responded to the direction of stimuli, standard congruency effects for arrows and RCE for eye-gaze stimuli were observed. However, when participants responded to the colour of stimuli, no congruency effects were observed. These results suggest that it is necessary to explicitly pay attention to the direction of eye-gaze and arrows for the congruency effect to occur. The same pattern of data was observed when participants responded either manually or verbally, demonstrating that manual motor components are not responsible for the results observed. These findings are not consistent with some hypotheses previously proposed to explain the RCE observed with eye-gaze stimuli and, therefore, call for an alternative plausible hypothesis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35192045
doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01659-x
pii: 10.1007/s00426-022-01659-x
pmc: PMC9873763
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

242-259

Subventions

Organisme : Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte
ID : FPU16/05056
Organisme : Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España
ID : PSI2017-88136-P
Organisme : Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España
ID : PSI2017-84926-P
Organisme : Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España
ID : IJCI-2014-21113

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Eur J Neurosci. 2018 Mar;47(6):497-514
pubmed: 28922520
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Jan;73(1):80-90
pubmed: 31331242
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Oct 1;45(13):3024-37
pubmed: 17644145
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 Mar;9(2):131-43
pubmed: 26173251
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 May;143(1):7-13
pubmed: 23500109
Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:693-716
pubmed: 18771388
Conscious Cogn. 2012 Dec;21(4):1703-10
pubmed: 23117220
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Aug;18(4):796-809
pubmed: 29736681
J Neurosci. 2015 Sep 30;35(39):13287-99
pubmed: 26424878
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Oct;27(5):833-855
pubmed: 32291650
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Jan 19;371(1686):20150080
pubmed: 26644598
Psychol Sci. 2002 Sep;13(5):460-4
pubmed: 12219814
Neuroimage. 2006 Oct 15;33(1):406-13
pubmed: 16949306
Psychol Bull. 1991 Mar;109(2):163-203
pubmed: 2034749
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 1;124(Pt A):118-126
pubmed: 26343316
Br J Psychol. 2022 Aug;113(3):718-738
pubmed: 34997569
Emotion. 2011 Dec;11(6):1456-61
pubmed: 21604875
Child Dev. 2007 May-Jun;78(3):938-54
pubmed: 17517014
Emotion. 2005 Mar;5(1):3-11
pubmed: 15755215
Biol Psychol. 2016 Dec;121(Pt A):84-90
pubmed: 27756579
Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 08;8:1954
pubmed: 29167652
Sci Rep. 2014 Jan 24;4:3858
pubmed: 24457351
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Jul;208:103116
pubmed: 32585433
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 19;10:1786
pubmed: 31481908
Psychol Rev. 1990 Apr;97(2):253-70
pubmed: 2186425
J Gen Psychol. 2015;142(2):106-17
pubmed: 25832740
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Jun;40(3):929-937
pubmed: 24377486
Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(9):2423-30
pubmed: 18402988
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 May 25;:
pubmed: 29799619
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 14;11:95
pubmed: 32116911
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jul;81(5):1236-1252
pubmed: 30737756
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Oct;183(1):87-94
pubmed: 17624520
Neuropsychologia. 2009 Jan;47(2):370-81
pubmed: 18926835
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jul 9;99(14):9602-5
pubmed: 12082186
Conscious Cogn. 2016 Feb;40:131-40
pubmed: 26821242
J Vis. 2015 Feb 20;15(2):
pubmed: 25761338
Front Neurosci. 2019 May 24;13:517
pubmed: 31178686
Cognition. 2015 Oct;143:108-14
pubmed: 26133642
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Sep;145(9):1102-6
pubmed: 27559616
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2022 Aug;48(8):824-841
pubmed: 35666922
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000 Aug;24(6):581-604
pubmed: 10940436
J Autism Dev Disord. 2005 Jun;35(3):267-77
pubmed: 16119468
Cognition. 2011 May;119(2):307-11
pubmed: 21316650
Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):3-25
pubmed: 7367577
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Mar;13(3):127-34
pubmed: 19217822
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Apr;38(2):326-35
pubmed: 21688940
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(8):1586-98
pubmed: 22530703
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2013 Jul;143(3):317-21
pubmed: 23732953
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Jun;47(6):765-773
pubmed: 33856854
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Feb;43(2):237-249
pubmed: 27359225
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Jun;129:146-152
pubmed: 30935837
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Dec;25(6):2254-2259
pubmed: 29546665
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):58-76
pubmed: 28685272
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Jun;10(2):423-9
pubmed: 12921419
Vision Res. 2011 Sep 15;51(18):2048-56
pubmed: 21840332
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 07;9:93
pubmed: 29467703
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Mar;1156:118-40
pubmed: 19338506
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Nov;47(11):1561-1573
pubmed: 34843360
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Oct;141(2):270-5
pubmed: 22742661
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 28;9:1587
pubmed: 30210410
Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:259-89
pubmed: 17002553
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Mar;40:35-51
pubmed: 24462751
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2009 Jun;33(6):843-63
pubmed: 19428496

Auteurs

Cristina Narganes-Pineda (C)

Department of Experimental Psychology, Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja, s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain. cnarganes@ugr.es.

Ana B Chica (AB)

Department of Experimental Psychology, Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja, s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain.

Juan Lupiáñez (J)

Department of Experimental Psychology, Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja, s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain.

Andrea Marotta (A)

Department of Experimental Psychology, Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja, s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH