Factors Influencing Team Performance: What Can Support Teams in High-Performance Sport Learn from Other Industries? A Systematic Scoping Review.
Leadership
Organisation
Team effectiveness
Team performance
Teamwork
Journal
Sports medicine - open
ISSN: 2199-1170
Titre abrégé: Sports Med Open
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101662568
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Feb 2022
22 Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
20
06
2021
accepted:
29
12
2021
entrez:
22
2
2022
pubmed:
23
2
2022
medline:
23
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The primary aim of our systematic scoping review was to explore the factors influencing team function and performance across various industries and discuss findings in the context of the high-performance sport support team setting. These outcomes may also be used to inform future research into high-performance teamwork in sport. A systematic scoping review of literature published in English since 2000 reporting team-based performance outcomes and included a performance metric that was 'team outcome based' was conducted using search of the Academic Search Ultimate, Medline, Business Source Ultimate, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Military database (ProQuest) using the terms: 'team', 'function' OR 'dysfunction', 'Perform*' OR 'outcome'. Application of the search strategy identified a total of 11,735 articles for title and abstract review. Seventy-three articles were selected for full-text assessment with the aim to extract data for either quantitative or qualitative analysis. Forty-six of the 73 articles met our inclusion criteria; 27 articles were excluded as they did not report a performance metric. Eleven studies explored leadership roles and styles on team performance, three studies associated performance feedback to team performance, and 12 studies explored the relationship between supportive behaviour and performance. Team orientation and adaptability as key figures of team performance outcomes were explored in 20 studies. Our findings identified 4 key variables that were associated with team function and performance across a variety of industries; (i) leadership styles, (ii) supportive team behaviour, (iii) communication, and (iv) performance feedback. High-performance teams wishing to improve performance should examine these factors within their team and its environment. It is widely acknowledged that the dynamics of team function is important for outcomes in high-performance sport, yet there is little evidence to provide guidance. This inequality between real-world need and the available evidence should be addressed in future research.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The primary aim of our systematic scoping review was to explore the factors influencing team function and performance across various industries and discuss findings in the context of the high-performance sport support team setting. These outcomes may also be used to inform future research into high-performance teamwork in sport.
METHODS
METHODS
A systematic scoping review of literature published in English since 2000 reporting team-based performance outcomes and included a performance metric that was 'team outcome based' was conducted using search of the Academic Search Ultimate, Medline, Business Source Ultimate, APA PsycInfo, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Military database (ProQuest) using the terms: 'team', 'function' OR 'dysfunction', 'Perform*' OR 'outcome'.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Application of the search strategy identified a total of 11,735 articles for title and abstract review. Seventy-three articles were selected for full-text assessment with the aim to extract data for either quantitative or qualitative analysis. Forty-six of the 73 articles met our inclusion criteria; 27 articles were excluded as they did not report a performance metric. Eleven studies explored leadership roles and styles on team performance, three studies associated performance feedback to team performance, and 12 studies explored the relationship between supportive behaviour and performance. Team orientation and adaptability as key figures of team performance outcomes were explored in 20 studies.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings identified 4 key variables that were associated with team function and performance across a variety of industries; (i) leadership styles, (ii) supportive team behaviour, (iii) communication, and (iv) performance feedback. High-performance teams wishing to improve performance should examine these factors within their team and its environment. It is widely acknowledged that the dynamics of team function is important for outcomes in high-performance sport, yet there is little evidence to provide guidance. This inequality between real-world need and the available evidence should be addressed in future research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35192078
doi: 10.1186/s40798-021-00406-7
pii: 10.1186/s40798-021-00406-7
pmc: PMC8864029
doi:
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
25Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(6):1396-405
pubmed: 17100493
Physiol Behav. 2014 May 10;130:170-5
pubmed: 24726389
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014 Mar;9(2):324-31
pubmed: 23881230
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:177-179
pubmed: 32229248
Sociol Health Illn. 2008 Apr;30(3):429-44
pubmed: 18194358
Fam Syst Health. 2015 Sep;33(3):222-30
pubmed: 25799255
Br J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;51(14):1054-1055
pubmed: 28330847
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2009 Jun;80(2):281-90
pubmed: 19650394
Br J Sports Med. 2018 Apr;52(8):527-531
pubmed: 29056596
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2008 Jul;21(3):309-24
pubmed: 18612856
J Sports Sci. 2013;31(13):1377-82
pubmed: 23978109
Hum Factors. 2012 Apr;54(2):277-95
pubmed: 22624293
J Hum Kinet. 2013 Dec 31;39:221-9
pubmed: 24511358
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Feb;72(4):513-20
pubmed: 21183266
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Jul;90(4):811-8
pubmed: 16060798
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;53(5):304-308
pubmed: 30104210
J Appl Psychol. 2006 Mar;91(2):311-29
pubmed: 16551186
Am Psychol. 2018 May-Jun;73(4):433-450
pubmed: 29792459
Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2018 Jul 1;28(4):316-331
pubmed: 29771168
Sports (Basel). 2017 Aug 18;5(3):
pubmed: 29910422
Br J Sports Med. 2018 May;52(10):626-627
pubmed: 28954792
Hum Factors. 2005 Spring;47(1):50-66
pubmed: 15960086
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016 Mar;26(3):348-58
pubmed: 25728170
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018 Jun 12;:1-15
pubmed: 29893598
J Appl Psychol. 2013 Mar;98(2):385-92
pubmed: 22963513
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 12;9(9):e028280
pubmed: 31515415
Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69
pubmed: 20854677
Br J Sports Med. 2014 Apr;48(7):523-31
pubmed: 24620040
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Dec;86(6):1285-93
pubmed: 11768069
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 13;12(1):e0169604
pubmed: 28085922
Harv Bus Rev. 1993 Mar-Apr;71(2):111-20
pubmed: 10124632
BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Mar 29;12:14
pubmed: 21443806
J Athl Train. 2018 Jul;53(7):703-708
pubmed: 30102070
Med Care Res Rev. 2006 Jun;63(3):263-300
pubmed: 16651394
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Dec;7(3):77-124
pubmed: 26158912
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Mar;50(5):257
pubmed: 27314137
Hum Factors. 2016 Jun;58(4):595-610
pubmed: 27113991