Retzius-sparing technique independently predicts early recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.


Journal

Journal of robotic surgery
ISSN: 1863-2491
Titre abrégé: J Robot Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101300401

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Historique:
received: 13 08 2021
accepted: 06 02 2022
pubmed: 23 2 2022
medline: 29 10 2022
entrez: 22 2 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is the conventional surgical treatment option for localised prostate cancer. We investigated factors which may be associated with recovery of early urinary continence (EUC), including the use of the Retzius-sparing technique (RS-RARP). From March 2018 to December 2018, 501 consecutive patients underwent RARP at our high-volume institution. Four hundred and thirty-one patients had complete follow-up data and were included in our analyses. EUC was defined as zero pad use and social urinary continence (SUC) was defined as ≤ 1 pad/24-h period at 3 months following surgery. Patient demographics and clinical factors such as age, body mass index (BMI), neurovascular bundle (NVB) sparing, RS-RARP operative technique and operating surgeon (consultant, trainee) were recorded. Median age was 64.0 years (IQR 57.0-69.0 years) with a median BMI of 27.0 (IQR 25.0-29.9). RS-RARP accounted for 59 of the 431 (13.7%) patients. 196 (45.5%), 142 (32.9%) and 86 (20.0%) received a bilateral, unilateral and nil NVB sparing, respectively. EUC was achieved by 241 patients (55.9%) and SUC was achieved in 339 (78.7%) patients. Multivariable logistic regression analysis suggests younger age (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, p = 0.014) and RS-RARP technique (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.15-4.16, p = 0.017) were independently associated with EUC at 3 months even after adjusting for BMI, external membranous urethral length and NVB sparing. Our results suggest that RS-RARP technique is independently predictive of EUC even after accounting for confounding factors. These findings should be further validated in a prospective or randomised trial.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35192106
doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01383-z
pii: 10.1007/s11701-022-01383-z
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1419-1426

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Références

Culp MBB, Soerjomataram I, Efstathiou JA, Bray F, Jemal A (2020) Recent global patterns in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates. Eur Urol 77(1):38–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.005
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.005 pubmed: 31493960
Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA et al (2016) 10-year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 375(15):1415–1424. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1606220
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606220 pubmed: 27626136
Falagario U, Veccia A, Weprin S et al (2020) Robotic-assisted surgery for the treatment of urologic cancers: recent advances. Expert Rev Med Devices 2020(17434440):1762487. https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2020.1762487
doi: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1762487
Ficarra V, Sooriakumaran P, Novara G et al (2012) Systematic review of methods for reporting combined outcomes after radical prostatectomy and proposal of a novel system: The survival, continence, and potency (SCP) classification. Eur Urol 61(3):541–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.11.042
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.11.042 pubmed: 22153926
Sridhar AN, Abozaid M, Rajan P et al (2017) Surgical techniques to optimize early urinary continence recovery post robot assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-017-0717-4
doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0717-4 pubmed: 28942572 pmcid: 5514172
Weldon VE, Tavel FR, Neuwirth H (1997) Continence, potency and morbidity after radical perineal prostatectomy. J Urol 158(4):1470–1475. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64245-9
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64245-9 pubmed: 9302145
Eden C (2020) Retzius-sparing robotic radical prostatectomy. Asian J Androl 22(2):149–151. https://doi.org/10.4103/aja.aja_82_19
doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_82_19 pubmed: 31424028
Dalela D, Jeong W, Prasad MA et al (2017) A pragmatic randomized controlled trial examining the impact of the Retzius-sparing approach on early urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 72(5):677–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.029
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.029 pubmed: 28483330
Umari P, Eden C, Cahill D, Rizzo M, Eden D, Sooriakumaran P (2020) Retzius-Sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a comparative prospective study of nearly 500 patients. J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000001435
doi: 10.1097/ju.0000000000001435 pubmed: 33086025
Galfano A, Ascione A, Grimaldi S, Petralia G, Strada E, Bocciardi AM (2010) A new anatomic approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a feasibility study for completely intrafascial surgery. Eur Urol 58(3):457–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.008
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.008 pubmed: 20566236
Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):405–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045 pubmed: 22749852
Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):418–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.046
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.046 pubmed: 22749850
Coughlin GD, Yaxley JW, Chambers SK et al (2018) Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol 19(8):1051–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30357-7
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30357-7 pubmed: 30017351
Li X, Zhang H, Jia Z et al (2020) Urinary continence outcomes of 4 years of follow-up and predictors of early and late urinary continence in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BMC Urol. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-00601-w
doi: 10.1186/s12894-020-00601-w pubmed: 33287818 pmcid: 7720614
Patel VR, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Rocco B (2009) Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes. Eur Urol 56(3):472–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.007
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.007 pubmed: 19560260
Hakimi AA, Faleck DM, Agalliu I, Rozenblit AM, Chernyak V, Ghavamian R (2011) Preoperative and intraoperative measurements of urethral length as predictors of continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 25(6):1025–1030. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2010.0692
doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0692 pubmed: 21568755
Li Y, Li W, Lu W et al (2020) Association of preoperative urethral parameters on magnetic resonance imaging and immediate recovery of continence following Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Transl Androl Urol 9(2):501–509. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2019.12.17
doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.17 pubmed: 32420156 pmcid: 7215013
Galfano A, Di Trapani D, Sozzi F et al (2013) Beyond the learning curve of the Retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with ≥1 year of follow-up. Eur Urol 64(6):974–980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.046
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.046 pubmed: 23856036
Lim SK, Kim KH, Shin TY et al (2014) Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Combining the best of retropubic and perineal approaches. BJU Int 114(2):236–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12705
doi: 10.1111/bju.12705 pubmed: 24612011
Sayyid RK, Simpson WG, Lu C, Terris MK, Klaassen Z, Madi R (2017) Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a safe surgical technique with superior continence outcomes. J Endourol 31(12):1244–1250. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0490
doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0490 pubmed: 28859492
Eden CG, Moschonas D, Soares R (2018) Urinary continence four weeks following Retzius-sparing robotic radical prostatectomy: the UK experience. J Clin Urol 11(1):15–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/2051415817706635
doi: 10.1177/2051415817706635
Asimakopoulos AD, Topazio L, De Angelis M et al (2019) Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective randomized comparison on immediate continence rates. Surg Endosc 33(7):2187–2196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6499-z
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6499-z pubmed: 30426256
Galfano A, Secco S, Dell’Oglio P et al (2020) Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: early learning curve experience in three continents. BJU Int. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15196
doi: 10.1111/bju.15196 pubmed: 32745367 pmcid: 7322984
Phukan C, Mclean A, Nambiar A et al (2019) Retzius sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy vs. conventional robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02798-4
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02798-4 pubmed: 31089802
Menon M, Dalela D, Jamil M et al (2018) Functional recovery, oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an evidence-based analysis comparing the Retzius sparing and standard approaches. J Urol 199(5):1210–1217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.115
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.115 pubmed: 29225060
Eastham J, Tokuda Y, Scardino P (2009) Trends in radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol 16(2):151–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02178.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02178.x pubmed: 19183234
Tan WS, Krimphove MJ, Cole AP et al (2019) Variation in positive surgical margin status after radical prostatectomy for pT2 prostate cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer 17(5):e1060–e1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2019.06.008
doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.06.008 pubmed: 31303561
Nyarangi-Dix JN, Görtz M, Gradinarov G et al (2019) Retzius-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: functional and early oncologic results in aggressive and locally advanced prostate cancer. BMC Urol 19(1):113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0550-9
doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0550-9 pubmed: 31718600 pmcid: 6852736

Auteurs

Hassan Kadhim (H)

Department of Urology, Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, UK.

Kar Mun Ang (KM)

Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woolwich, UK.

Wei Shen Tan (WS)

Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, 3rd floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK. wei.tan@ucl.ac.uk.
Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK. wei.tan@ucl.ac.uk.
Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK. wei.tan@ucl.ac.uk.

Arjun Nathan (A)

Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, 3rd floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK.
Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
Department of Urology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.

Nicola Pavan (N)

Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.

Giorgio Mazzon (G)

Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.

Omar Al-Kadhi (O)

Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.

Gu Di (G)

Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.

Eoin Dinneen (E)

Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, 3rd floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK.
Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.

Tim Briggs (T)

Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.

Anand Kelkar (A)

Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.

Prabhakar Rajan (P)

Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
Cancer Research UK Barts Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Senthil Nathan (S)

Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, 3rd floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK.
Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.

John D Kelly (JD)

Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, 3rd floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK.
Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.

Prasanna Sooriakumaran (P)

Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, 3rd floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK.
Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.
Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Ashwin Sridhar (A)

Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, 3rd floor Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London, W1W 7TS, UK.
Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH