Measuring Muscle Activity in the Trunk, Pelvis, and Lower Limb Which Are Used to Maintain Standing Posture in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity, With Focus on Muscles that Contract in the Compensatory Status.

adult spinal deformity compensatory mechanisms muscle activity spino-pelvic parameters standing posture surface electromyography

Journal

Global spine journal
ISSN: 2192-5682
Titre abrégé: Global Spine J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101596156

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Historique:
medline: 23 2 2022
pubmed: 23 2 2022
entrez: 22 2 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Prospective single-center study. This study aimed to investigate the muscle activity of the trunk, pelvis, and lower limb, which are used to maintain a standing posture in elderly patients with spinal deformities. We also elucidated the mechanism of compensation against spinal deformity in terms of muscle activity. Any patient scheduled to undergo surgery for adult spinal deformity was included. Surface electromyography and radiography were performed preoperatively. The following four representative alignments were defined as compensations: 1. pelvic retroversion, 2. reduction in thoracic kyphosis, 3. hyperextension of the lumbosacral junction, and 4. knee flexion. Individual muscle activity was compared with and without compensation. The patients were stratified into three groups according to the severity of spinal compensation, and differences in muscle activity were compared. This study included 76 patients (7 men and 69 women, average age 69.4 years). Our results revealed that pelvic retroversion and knee flexion were compensations that required trunk muscle activity. In contrast, reduction of thoracic kyphosis and hyperextension of the lumbosacral junction did not require much trunk muscle activity. There was a significant difference in the muscle activity of the pelvis and lower limbs according to the severity of the deformity. In terms of muscle activity, compensation for regional alignment changes in the adjacent spine is economical. However, extra-spinal compensations, such as pelvic retroversion and knee flexion, are non-economical. According to compensation recruitment, the muscle activity of the pelvis and lower limbs increased with the severity of the spinal deformity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35192405
doi: 10.1177/21925682221079257
pmc: PMC10538328
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2245-2254

Références

J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Jan;59:106-111
pubmed: 30409531
Spine J. 2019 Jul;19(7):1202-1209
pubmed: 30769092
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Aug;25(6):E167-73
pubmed: 22614265
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 1;34(17):E599-606
pubmed: 19644319
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 May 1;40(9):642-9
pubmed: 25705962
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Mar 1;25(5):575-86
pubmed: 10749634
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Mar 15;30(6):682-8
pubmed: 15770185
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 May 1;42(9):653-661
pubmed: 27974739
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Nov 30;22(Suppl 2):999
pubmed: 34847906
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Mar 15;26(6):E114-21
pubmed: 11246393
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 May 15;42(10):733-739
pubmed: 27617839
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 1;34(17):1873-8
pubmed: 19644340
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Oct 1;40(19):1487-94
pubmed: 26208229
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Aug;83(8):1169-81
pubmed: 11507125
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 11;11(2):e0149076
pubmed: 26866911
Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Aug;30(7):E968-E973
pubmed: 28746131
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Mar;24(3):436-46
pubmed: 26565764
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 May 15;42(10):E584-E591
pubmed: 27669043
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Aug 1;35(17):E836-42
pubmed: 20628333
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 20;37(12):1077-82
pubmed: 22045006
World J Orthop. 2015 Oct 18;6(9):727-37
pubmed: 26495250
Spine Deform. 2019 Jan;7(1):125-131
pubmed: 30587305
Eur Spine J. 2013 Nov;22 Suppl 6:S834-41
pubmed: 24052406
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Mar;48(3):452-8
pubmed: 23208313
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Feb 1;33(3):318-25
pubmed: 18303466
Osteoporos Int. 2012 Mar;23(3):1029-34
pubmed: 21455761
Bone Joint J. 2020 Oct;102-B(10):1359-1367
pubmed: 32993332
Eur Spine J. 2011 Sep;20 Suppl 5:626-33
pubmed: 21796393
Spine J. 2016 Apr;16(4):451-8
pubmed: 26165478
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Oct 1;96(19):1631-40
pubmed: 25274788
Osteoporos Int. 2007 Oct;18(10):1397-403
pubmed: 17460805
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Nov;28(11):3153-3160
pubmed: 28785980
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2020 Dec;55:102482
pubmed: 33147543

Auteurs

Yu Yamato (Y)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Division of Geriatric Musculoskeletal Health, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.

Osamu Nojima (O)

Department of Rehabilitation, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.

Tomohiro Banno (T)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.

Tomohiko Hasegawa (T)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.

Go Yoshida (G)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.

Shin Oe (S)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Division of Geriatric Musculoskeletal Health, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.

Hideyuki Arima (H)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.

Yuki Mihara (Y)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.

Tetsuyuki Nagafusa (T)

Department of Rehabilitation, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.

Katsuya Yamauchi (K)

Department of Rehabilitation, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.

Yukihiro Matsuyama (Y)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.

Classifications MeSH