HoLEPs: A Comparative Study of Men With Massive Prostate Volumes ≥150 mL and <150 mL.


Journal

Urology
ISSN: 1527-9995
Titre abrégé: Urology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0366151

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2022
Historique:
received: 06 08 2021
revised: 01 12 2021
accepted: 06 12 2021
pubmed: 23 2 2022
medline: 22 6 2022
entrez: 22 2 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To assess outcomes following Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate (HoLEP) in men with prostate volumes ≥150cc and compare this to men with prostate volumes ≤150 cc. We analyzed our prospective database of consecutive patients undergoing HoLEP in a single tertiary public hospital between October 2016 and January 2019. We excluded patients with clinically significant prostate cancer or neurogenic bladders. Preoperative prostate volume was measured on MRI or ultrasonography. Perioperative variables and functional outcomes were recorded. Of 304 HoLEPs performed, we included 97 patients with prostate volume of ≥150 cc and 186 patients with prostate volume <150 cc. Comparing both cohorts (≥150 cc vs <150 cc): mean age was 71.5 vs 68.3 years, prostate volume 195 cc vs 93 cc, preoperative Qmax 9.6mL/s vs 10mL/s, American Urology Association Symptom Score (IPSS) 21 points vs 20.5 points; mean PSA 13.2µg/L vs 8.8µg/L; laser duration 86 vs 59 minutes; morcellation duration 29 vs 14 minutes; enucleated weight was 124 g vs 60 g. One patient (1%) from the ≥150 cc cohort required a surgical procedure for stress urinary incontinence, and none from the <150 cc cohort, but this did not achieve statistical significance (P = .12). There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative Qmax (32.3 vs 26.4 mL/s; P = .12), IPSS (5.9 points vs 7.3points; P = .23), mean PSA (3.9 µg/L vs 2.2 µg/L; P = .60), stricture incidence (1% vs 2.7%; P = .63), or significant stress urinary incontinence (4.1% vs 0.5%; P = .08). Our large series demonstrates that HoLEP is safe and effective in patients with massive prostates (≥150 cc), with similar outcomes compared to patients with prostates <150 cc.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35192862
pii: S0090-4295(22)00148-0
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.12.038
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Prostate-Specific Antigen EC 3.4.21.77
Holmium W1XX32SQN1

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

197-203

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Li June Tay (LJ)

Department of Urology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: taylj85@gmail.com.

Meghana Kulkarni (M)

Department of Urology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Akinlolu Oluwole-Ojo (A)

King's College London School of Medicine, United Kingdom.

Leigh James Spurling (LJ)

East Surrey Hospital, United Kingdom.

Oussama El-Hage (O)

Department of Urology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Ella DiBenedetto (E)

Department of Urology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Marios Hadjipavlou (M)

Department of Urology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Rick Popert (R)

Department of Urology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Ben Challacombe (B)

Department of Urology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH