Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of 6% Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) sOlution versus an Electrolyte solutioN In patients undergoing eleCtive abdominal Surgery: study protocol for the PHOENICS study.
Blood loss
Colloids
Double-blinded
HES
Hydroxyethyl starch
Multi-center
Multinational
Non-inferiority trial
Randomized controlled trial
Safety
Surgery
Volume therapy
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Feb 2022
22 Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
21
09
2021
accepted:
27
01
2022
entrez:
23
2
2022
pubmed:
24
2
2022
medline:
25
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions are used for volume therapy to treat hypovolemia due to acute blood loss and to maintain hemodynamic stability. This study was requested by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to provide more evidence on the long-term safety and efficacy of HES solutions in the perioperative setting. PHOENICS is a randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational phase IV (IIIb) study with two parallel groups to investigate non-inferiority regarding the safety of a 6% HES 130 solution (Volulyte 6%, Fresenius Kabi, Germany) compared with a crystalloid solution (Ionolyte, Fresenius Kabi, Germany) for infusion in patients with acute blood loss during elective abdominal surgery. A total of 2280 eligible patients (male and female patients willing to participate, with expected blood loss ≥ 500 ml, aged > 40 and ≤ 85 years, and ASA Physical status II-III) are randomly assigned to receive either HES or crystalloid solution for the treatment of hypovolemia due to surgery-induced acute blood loss in hospitals in up to 11 European countries. The dosing of investigational products (IP) is individualized to patients' volume needs and guided by a volume algorithm. Patients are treated with IP for maximally 24 h or until the maximum daily dose of 30 ml/kg body weight is reached. The primary endpoint is the treatment group mean difference in the change from the pre-operative baseline value in cystatin-C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), to the eGFR value calculated from the highest cystatin-C level measured during post-operative days 1-3. Further safety and efficacy parameters include, e.g., combined mortality/major post-operative complications until day 90, renal function, coagulation, inflammation, hemodynamic variables, hospital length of stay, major post-operative complications, and 28-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality. The study will provide important information on the long-term safety and efficacy of HES 130/0.4 when administered according to the approved European product information. The results will be relevant for volume therapy of surgical patients. EudraCT 2016-002162-30 . ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03278548.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions are used for volume therapy to treat hypovolemia due to acute blood loss and to maintain hemodynamic stability. This study was requested by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to provide more evidence on the long-term safety and efficacy of HES solutions in the perioperative setting.
METHODS
METHODS
PHOENICS is a randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-center, multinational phase IV (IIIb) study with two parallel groups to investigate non-inferiority regarding the safety of a 6% HES 130 solution (Volulyte 6%, Fresenius Kabi, Germany) compared with a crystalloid solution (Ionolyte, Fresenius Kabi, Germany) for infusion in patients with acute blood loss during elective abdominal surgery. A total of 2280 eligible patients (male and female patients willing to participate, with expected blood loss ≥ 500 ml, aged > 40 and ≤ 85 years, and ASA Physical status II-III) are randomly assigned to receive either HES or crystalloid solution for the treatment of hypovolemia due to surgery-induced acute blood loss in hospitals in up to 11 European countries. The dosing of investigational products (IP) is individualized to patients' volume needs and guided by a volume algorithm. Patients are treated with IP for maximally 24 h or until the maximum daily dose of 30 ml/kg body weight is reached. The primary endpoint is the treatment group mean difference in the change from the pre-operative baseline value in cystatin-C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), to the eGFR value calculated from the highest cystatin-C level measured during post-operative days 1-3. Further safety and efficacy parameters include, e.g., combined mortality/major post-operative complications until day 90, renal function, coagulation, inflammation, hemodynamic variables, hospital length of stay, major post-operative complications, and 28-day, 90-day, and 1-year mortality.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
The study will provide important information on the long-term safety and efficacy of HES 130/0.4 when administered according to the approved European product information. The results will be relevant for volume therapy of surgical patients.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
EudraCT 2016-002162-30 . ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03278548.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35193648
doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06058-6
pii: 10.1186/s13063-022-06058-6
pmc: PMC8862305
doi:
Substances chimiques
Electrolytes
0
Hydroxyethyl Starch Derivatives
0
Plasma Substitutes
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03278548']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
168Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jan 10;358(2):125-39
pubmed: 18184958
BMJ. 2008 Oct 02;337:a1469
pubmed: 18832415
Anesthesiology. 2019 May;130(5):728-744
pubmed: 30882476
Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2009 Jul-Sep;24(3):305-11
pubmed: 20011875
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 5;367(1):20-9
pubmed: 22762315
Crit Care. 2004 Oct;8(5):373-81
pubmed: 15469601
Am J Kidney Dis. 2007 Aug;50(2):219-28
pubmed: 17660023
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013 Jun;30(6):270-382
pubmed: 23656742
Anaesthesia. 2010 Oct;65(10):1022-30
pubmed: 20731639
Kidney Int. 2009 Aug;76(4):422-7
pubmed: 19436332
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Jul;33(7):488-521
pubmed: 27043493
Ann Surg. 2005 Sep;242(3):326-41; discussion 341-3
pubmed: 16135919
Anesthesiology. 2018 Jan;128(1):55-66
pubmed: 29068831
Anesthesiology. 2013 Feb;118(2):387-94
pubmed: 23340352
Anesth Analg. 2013 Jan;116(1):35-48
pubmed: 23115254
Crit Care. 2013 Dec 10;17(6):R288
pubmed: 24326085
Crit Care. 2006;10(3):R81
pubmed: 16749940
JAMA. 2014 Jun 4;311(21):2181-90
pubmed: 24842135
Br J Anaesth. 2005 Jul;95(1):20-32
pubmed: 15531622
Crit Care. 2005 Aug;9(4):390-6
pubmed: 16137389
Anesthesiology. 2007 Dec;107(6):892-902
pubmed: 18043057
JAMA. 2020 Jan 21;323(3):225-236
pubmed: 31961418
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2012 Jul;47(7-8):482-8; quiz 489
pubmed: 22918652
Br J Anaesth. 2014 Feb;112(2):281-9
pubmed: 24056586
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009 Apr;22(2):155-62
pubmed: 19307890
Lancet. 2012 Sep 22;380(9847):1059-65
pubmed: 22998715
Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb;39(2):259-65
pubmed: 20975548
Anesth Analg. 2011 Jun;112(6):1392-402
pubmed: 20966436
Crit Care. 2008;12(3):R74
pubmed: 18533029
Perioper Med (Lond). 2012 Jul 04;1:6
pubmed: 24764522
J Intensive Care Med. 2014 Jul-Aug;29(4):213-7
pubmed: 23753235
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2014 Nov-Dec;46(5):336-41
pubmed: 25432553
N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 15;367(20):1901-11
pubmed: 23075127
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Jul;5(7):1198-204
pubmed: 20430939
Crit Care. 2004 Aug;8(4):R204-12
pubmed: 15312219
N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 12;367(2):124-34
pubmed: 22738085
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Dec;203(6):865-77
pubmed: 17116555
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Apr;42(4):521-530
pubmed: 26602784