Experiences of crisis care among service users with complex emotional needs or a diagnosis of 'personality disorder', and other stakeholders: systematic review and meta-synthesis of the qualitative literature.
Borderline personality disorder
crisis intervention
personality disorders
qualitative research
self-harm
Journal
BJPsych open
ISSN: 2056-4724
Titre abrégé: BJPsych Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101667931
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Feb 2022
24 Feb 2022
Historique:
entrez:
24
2
2022
pubmed:
25
2
2022
medline:
25
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Mental health crises are common in people with complex emotional needs (our preferred working term for people diagnosed with a 'personality disorder'), yet this population is often dissatisfied with the crisis care they receive. Exploring their experiences and views on what could be improved, and those of carers and healthcare staff, is key to developing better services. We aimed to synthesise the relevant qualitative literature. Five databases were searched. Eligible studies included service users with a diagnosis of personality disorder and their carers or relevant staff, focused on crisis responses and used a qualitative design. Data were analysed with thematic synthesis. Eleven studies were included, most focusing on emergency departments. Four meta-themes emerged: (a) acceptance and rejection when presenting to crisis care: limited options and lack of involvement of carers; (b) interpersonal processes: importance of the therapeutic relationship and establishing a framework for treatment; (c) managing recovery from a crisis: clear recovery plan and negotiating collaboration; and (d) equipping and supporting staff: training and emotional support. Our findings suggest that emergency departments have major limitations as settings to provide crisis care for people with complex emotional needs, but there is a lack of research exploring alternatives. The quality of the therapeutic relationship was central to how care was experienced, with collaborative and optimistic staff highly valued. Staff reported feeling poorly supported in responding to the needs of this population. Research looking at experiences of a range of care options and how to improve these is needed.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Mental health crises are common in people with complex emotional needs (our preferred working term for people diagnosed with a 'personality disorder'), yet this population is often dissatisfied with the crisis care they receive. Exploring their experiences and views on what could be improved, and those of carers and healthcare staff, is key to developing better services.
AIMS
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to synthesise the relevant qualitative literature.
METHOD
METHODS
Five databases were searched. Eligible studies included service users with a diagnosis of personality disorder and their carers or relevant staff, focused on crisis responses and used a qualitative design. Data were analysed with thematic synthesis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Eleven studies were included, most focusing on emergency departments. Four meta-themes emerged: (a) acceptance and rejection when presenting to crisis care: limited options and lack of involvement of carers; (b) interpersonal processes: importance of the therapeutic relationship and establishing a framework for treatment; (c) managing recovery from a crisis: clear recovery plan and negotiating collaboration; and (d) equipping and supporting staff: training and emotional support.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest that emergency departments have major limitations as settings to provide crisis care for people with complex emotional needs, but there is a lack of research exploring alternatives. The quality of the therapeutic relationship was central to how care was experienced, with collaborative and optimistic staff highly valued. Staff reported feeling poorly supported in responding to the needs of this population. Research looking at experiences of a range of care options and how to improve these is needed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35197131
doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.1
pii: S2056472422000011
pmc: PMC8935933
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
e53Références
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2010 Aug;53:s41-5
pubmed: 20679279
Community Ment Health J. 2013 Dec;49(6):643-8
pubmed: 23054157
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2014 Oct;23(5):442-50
pubmed: 24890615
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 29;16(4):e0248316
pubmed: 33914750
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Apr;28(2):208-236
pubmed: 32367638
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Aug 29;15:208
pubmed: 26319602
Qual Health Res. 2010 Dec;20(12):1736-43
pubmed: 20671302
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD009353
pubmed: 22696385
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;56(1):25-37
pubmed: 32857218
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 15;17(1):220
pubmed: 28619050
CJEM. 2008 Jul;10(4):339-46
pubmed: 18652726
J Ment Health. 2014 Oct;23(5):251-5
pubmed: 25222368
Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336-41
pubmed: 20171303
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2019 Jul 26;6:12
pubmed: 31372226
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Jun;28(3):757-765
pubmed: 30779279
Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2013 Jul-Sep;35(3):259-69
pubmed: 23899950
BJPsych Bull. 2017 Oct;41(5):247-253
pubmed: 29018548
Res Nurs Health. 1997 Aug;20(4):365-71
pubmed: 9256882
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2011 Jan;57(1):18-20
pubmed: 21252352
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Oct;29(5):962-971
pubmed: 32406168
Br J Psychiatry. 2013 May;202(5):357-64
pubmed: 23637110
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2003 Aug;10(4):393-401
pubmed: 12887630
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Jul 10;8:45
pubmed: 18616818
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Feb 1;68(2):167-172
pubmed: 27691382
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Sep;22(7):510-21
pubmed: 26122817
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2020 Sep 7;7:21
pubmed: 32944249
Psychiatr Serv. 2014 Jun 1;65(6):802-7
pubmed: 24585205
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 17;17(1):254
pubmed: 28716022