Comparison of ALitretinoin with PUVA as the first-line treatment in patients with severe chronic HAnd eczema (ALPHA): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
dermatology
eczema
occupational dermatology
photodermatology
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Feb 2022
23 Feb 2022
Historique:
entrez:
24
2
2022
pubmed:
25
2
2022
medline:
21
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Hand eczema (HE) is one of the most common skin disorders and an important cause for morbidity and occupational disability. The 1-year prevalence of HE is estimated to be up to 10% and it is estimated that 5%-7% of those develop severe chronic HE. However, current clinical evidence is not compelling enough to guide clinical practice. In a survey among 194 UK dermatologists the most frequent first choice approaches were psoralen combined with ultraviolet A (UVA) treatment (PUVA), oral steroids and alitretinoin (AL). When asked which strategy was most efficient for long-term outcome 20% of clinicians indicated they did not know; 43% of clinicians reported AL and 30% reported PUVA. ALPHA is a multicentre, open, prospective, two-arm parallel group, randomised controlled trial comparing PUVA and AL with a planned sample size re-estimation. Between 500 and 780 participants will be randomised on a 1:1 basis. The physician's global assessment (PGA) will direct treatment after randomisation, non-responders will be treated according to usual clinical practice; providing valuable pilot data on second line therapeutic approaches to inform future trials.Assessments will be conducted up to 52 weeks post randomisation. The primary outcome measure is the Hand Eczema Severity Index at 12 weeks. Secondary outcome measures include modified Total Lesion Symptom Score, PGA, time to relapse, patient reported outcome measures and DNA extraction and assessment of genetic variants. A substudy on molecular inflammatory mediators will provide information on subgroup specific treatment responses. Photographs will be taken and HE severity assessed by a central review panel. Ethics approval was obtained from Leeds West Research Ethics Committee (14/YH/1259).Trial results will be disseminated at relevant clinical conferences and societies, published in peer-reviewed journals and through relevant patient groups. ISRCTN80206075.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35197358
pii: bmjopen-2021-060029
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060029
pmc: PMC8867308
doi:
Substances chimiques
Alitretinoin
1UA8E65KDZ
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e060029Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None: MW, CG, SB, ILS, AV-P, LS, AB, PH, FC, CF, JN, CR, AB, CHS, JTL, MG and ST is a Health economist expert on the NIHR PGfAR, the H2020 mental health in the workplace (2019), the H2020 Innovation in health technology appraisal (2018) and the Belgian FNRS. commission of doctoral FRIA scholarship.
Références
Contact Dermatitis. 2008 Nov;59(5):257-60
pubmed: 18976374
J Invest Dermatol. 2006 Oct;126(10):2234-41
pubmed: 16741508
Br J Dermatol. 2013 Feb;168(2):233-4
pubmed: 23362965
Value Health. 2018 Aug;21(8):1010-1018
pubmed: 30098665
Contact Dermatitis. 2013 May;68(5):273-6
pubmed: 23343419
Br J Dermatol. 2008 Nov;159(5):997-1035
pubmed: 18795920
Exp Dermatol. 2013 May;22(5):364-6
pubmed: 23614747
Br J Dermatol. 2009 Feb;160(2):353-8
pubmed: 19016702
Acta Derm Venereol. 2018 Jan 12;98(1):50-58
pubmed: 28853491
Contact Dermatitis. 2007 Oct;57(4):203-10
pubmed: 17868211
N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 8;367(19):1829-37
pubmed: 23134383
Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208
pubmed: 10109801
Br J Dermatol. 2008 Apr;158(4):808-17
pubmed: 18294310
JAMA. 2001 Apr 18;285(15):1987-91
pubmed: 11308435
Br J Dermatol. 2005 May;152(5):975-80
pubmed: 15888155
Arch Dermatol. 2012 Nov;148(11):1251-5
pubmed: 23165828
Br J Dermatol. 2010 Jul;163(1):115-20
pubmed: 20426775
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2009 Oct;34(7):761-9
pubmed: 19747339
Qual Life Res. 2020 Sep;29(9):2529-2539
pubmed: 32297132
Contact Dermatitis. 2009 Jul;61(1):39-45
pubmed: 19659963
Br J Dermatol. 2005 Jan;152(1):93-8
pubmed: 15656807
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2017 Mar;42(2):185-188
pubmed: 27910127
Qual Life Res. 2017 Nov;26(11):3025-3034
pubmed: 28601958
J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997 May;36(5 Pt 1):733-7
pubmed: 9146535
Br J Dermatol. 2005 Feb;152(2):296-301
pubmed: 15727642
Br J Dermatol. 2012 Dec;167(6):1197-8
pubmed: 23181836
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Jul;77(1):130-135
pubmed: 28190621
Contact Dermatitis. 2020 Sep;83(3):196-205
pubmed: 32333380
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2009 May;7 Suppl 3:S1-16
pubmed: 19522920
J Invest Dermatol. 2002 Apr;118(4):719-23
pubmed: 11918722
JAMA. 2017 Dec 19;318(23):2337-2343
pubmed: 29260229
Br J Dermatol. 2009 Oct;161(4):801-7
pubmed: 19538184
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14 Suppl 1:39-46
pubmed: 20507802
Br J Dermatol. 2016 Jan;174(1):24-55
pubmed: 26790656
Br J Dermatol. 2005 Feb;152(2):302-7
pubmed: 15727643
Arch Dermatol Res. 2009 Sep;301(8):561-71
pubmed: 19326133
Contact Dermatitis. 2013 Aug;69(2):99-106
pubmed: 23869729
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Mar;54(3):448-57
pubmed: 16488296