The JNU-IFM dataset for segmenting pubic symphysis-fetal head.
Angle of progression
Fetal head
Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound
Pubic symphysis
Journal
Data in brief
ISSN: 2352-3409
Titre abrégé: Data Brief
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101654995
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
27
10
2021
revised:
21
01
2022
accepted:
27
01
2022
entrez:
24
2
2022
pubmed:
25
2
2022
medline:
25
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The use of transperineal ultrasound techniques for the assessment of fetal head descent and progression is an adjunct to clinical examination. Automatic identification of parameters based on ultrasound images will greatly reduce the subjectivity and non-repeatability of the clinician's judgment. However, the lack of a pubic symphysis-fetal head dataset hinders the development of algorithms. Here, we present an intrapartum transperineal ultrasound dataset of the Intelligent Fetal Monitoring Lab of Jinan University (named the JNU-IFM dataset), in which intrapartum transperineal ultrasound videos of 78 were recorded from 51 patients. These data were obtained with the Youkey D8 wireless 2D ultrasound probe with its corresponding supporting software by Wuhan Youkey Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China. In these videos, 6224 high-quality images with four categories were selected to form the JNU- IFM dataset. These images were labelled using the Pair software and then validated by two experienced radiologists. We hope that this data set can be used in the segmentation of the pubic symphysis-fetal head.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35198683
doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2022.107904
pii: S2352-3409(22)00116-0
pmc: PMC8842023
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.14371652']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
107904Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
BJOG. 2011 Jan;118(1):62-9
pubmed: 21083864
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Feb;35(2):216-22
pubmed: 20069668
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jun;41(6):710-1
pubmed: 23280777
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;39(3):310-5
pubmed: 21630362
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2014 Nov;57(6):427-35
pubmed: 25469329
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Dec;50(6):766-775
pubmed: 28233418
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;33(3):313-9
pubmed: 19248000
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;33(3):320-5
pubmed: 19248004
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2017;41(4):293-299
pubmed: 27592216
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;41(4):419-24
pubmed: 23124698
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr;27(4):387-91
pubmed: 16565994
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;33(3):331-6
pubmed: 19202576